Do you still focus attention on the lexical meaning of the words regarding the meeting of the Pope with Kyril?
I think that the Vatican diplomacy of Ukraine lost because of the meeting of the Pontiff with Patriarch Kyril, and lost because of “Cuba Declaration”.
That’s right: Pope Francis is against a military solution to the conflict, and UGCC supported the military conflict, supported the war.
Intellectuals of UCU initially did not support the rocking of the boat by radical, they did not support the division of people/regions on “friends and enemies” ,because of this, the radicals , who together with Yanukovych were preparing a war, chased UCU, but when it all came together so that Maidan could not win peacefully and after annexation has occurred, The UGCC supported the military solution to the conflict, that is, supported the war.
The UGCC could not take the side of peaceful solution to the conflict, as the Kiev Patriarchate and the Autocephalous Church had a Patriotic position as well.
We are supported by Western world, USA, we had the consolidation of society, increased national pride, strengthened national identity.
This is a very serious processes. Ukrainians make the history.
If Pope Francis does not understand the situation, in this instance, in our context of situation, then pacifism is fatal.
If Pope Francis is right, and a Christian ought to be above patriotism, and ought to give up the regions at the expense of national integrity, then right in this situation it is very difficult to apply this for - Ukrainian soldier and a Ukrainian patriot.