Once Saved, Always Saved

  • Thread starter Thread starter gracegray
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No offense but its been my experience that most protestants either cant or wont answer questions.
It looks to me like you have an opportunity to answer the question. It’s not difficult to answer this from a Protestant point of view. Brian quoted scripture and at least in my mind, that is an answer.

Did I maybe misunderstand your statement here?

If you have other questions, I will answer you. I don’t argue with Catholics as I don’t find it productive, but I will give you an answer.
 
It looks to me like you have an opportunity to answer the question. It’s not difficult to answer this from a Protestant point of view. Brian quoted scripture and at least in my mind, that is an answer.

Did I maybe misunderstand your statement here?

If you have other questions, I will answer you. I don’t argue with Catholics as I don’t find it productive, but I will give you an answer.
The question, however, is what the Catholic teaching on this matter is. I don’t think this particular quote nor your series of quotes in post #17 address the question at hand. I may be wrong but it looks like you and Brian may be more inclined to discuss the **non-Catholic **teaching which would be a subject for another thread.
 
It looks to me like you have an opportunity to answer the question. It’s not difficult to answer this from a Protestant point of view. Brian quoted scripture and at least in my mind, that is an answer.

Did I maybe misunderstand your statement here?

If you have other questions, I will answer you. I don’t argue with Catholics as I don’t find it productive, but I will give you an answer.
The problem is the questions dont address the issue of OSAS. They represent what my experience with protestants has most often been like…they dont answer questions they just preach.

So like you I dont argue with protestants since I already have a preacher
 
I can accept that you don’t think this is a OSAS issue. But nothing could be further from the truth. Scripture teaches over and over (as I have shown) that we can’t lose our salvation, provided however, our call upon the Lord was sincere in the first place.
 
jude 1:24 (new american standard bible)
24(a)now to him who is able to keep you from stumbling, and to (b)make you stand in the presence of his glory blameless with (c)great joy, osas

hebrews 12:2 (new american standard bible)
2fixing our eyes on jesus, the (a)author and perfecter of faith, who for the joy set before him (b)endured the cross, (c)despising the shame, and has (d)sat down at the right hand of the throne of god. osas

hebrews 7:25 (new american standard bible)
25therefore he is able also to (a)save forever those who (b)draw near to god through him, since he always lives to (c)make intercession for them. osas

john 10:28-29 (new american standard bible)
28and i give (a)eternal life to them, and they will never perish; and (b)**no one will snatch them out of my hand. ** 29"[a]my father, who has given them to me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of the father’s hand. osas

john 5:24 (new american standard bible)
24"truly, truly, i** say to you, he who hears my word, and (a)believes him who sent me, has eternal life, and (b)does not come into judgment, but has (c)passed out of death into life. osas**

ephesians 1:13-14 (new american standard bible)
13in him, you also, after listening to (a)the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation**–having also believed, you were (b)sealed in him with (c)the holy spirit of promise, 14who is (d)given as a pledge of (e)our inheritance, with a view to the (f)redemption of (g)god’s own possession, (h)to the praise of his glory.** osas

philippians 1:6 (new american standard bible)
6for i am confident of this very thing, that he who began a good work in you will perfect it until (a)the day of christ jesus.
osas
 
I can accept that you don’t think this is a OSAS issue. But nothing could be further from the truth. Scripture teaches over and over (as I have shown) that we can’t lose our salvation, provided however, our call upon the Lord was sincere in the first place.
The issue is OSAS what I said was the question put forth have nothing to do with OSAS. If Paul was so certain of his salvation he would not have to work it out with fear and trembling. There is nothing to fear or tremble over if there is nothing to lose.

I know I know you will tell me “context” or that Paul meant something different then fear and trembling. Am I warm? The fact remains Paul would have no reason to pen the words fear and trembling if he was certain he couldnt lose his salvation. And I do appreciate how you hedge your bets by saying if one loses their salvation they were never sincere in the first place.

OSAS says we are miserable creatures unworthy of saving but we are saved by Gods grace but even though we are saved we continue to sin (since you cant say we stop being sinners) it just doesnt count but people who continue to sin once saved were never really saved in the first place. Its classic textbook circular reasoning
 
Jude 1:24 (New American Standard Bible)
24(A)Now to Him who is able to keep you from stumbling, and to (B)make you stand in the presence of His glory blameless with (C)great joy,

Hebrews 12:2 (New American Standard Bible)
2fixing our eyes on Jesus, the (A)author and perfecter of faith, who for the joy set before Him (B)endured the cross, (C)despising the shame, and has (D)sat down at the right hand of the throne of God.

Hebrews 7:25 (New American Standard Bible)
25Therefore He is able also to (A)save forever those who (B)draw near to God through Him, since He always lives to (C)make intercession for them.

John 10:28-29 (New American Standard Bible)
28and I give (A)eternal life to them, and they will never perish; and (B)no one will snatch them out of My hand. 29"[a]My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father’s hand.

John 5:24 (New American Standard Bible)
24"Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and (A)believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and (B)does not come into judgment, but has (C)passed out of death into life.

Ephesians 1:13-14 (New American Standard Bible)
13In Him, you also, after listening to (A)the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation–having also believed, you were (B)sealed in Him with (C)the Holy Spirit of promise, 14who is (D)given as a pledge of (E)our inheritance, with a view to the (F)redemption of (G)God’s own possession, (H)to the praise of His glory.

Philippians 1:6 (New American Standard Bible)
6For I am confident of this very thing, that He who began a good work in you will perfect it until (A)the day of Christ Jesus.
These are all wonderful and all rightly claim that when we believe we are saved. Nothing here though says we cant fall away and lose that certainty if we fail or cease to believe.
 
I can accept that you don’t think this is a OSAS issue. But nothing could be further from the truth. Scripture teaches over and over (as I have shown) that we can’t lose our salvation, provided however, our call upon the Lord was sincere in the first place.
Then explain:

Matthew 7: 21:
21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.

Or Romans 11:17-22

17 If some of the branches have been broken off, and you, though a wild olive shoot, have been grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing sap from the olive root, 18 do not consider yourself to be superior to those other branches. If you do, consider this: You do not support the root, but the root supports you. 19 You will say then, “Branches were broken off so that I could be grafted in.” 20 Granted. But they were broken off because of unbelief, and you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but tremble. 21 For if God did not spare the natural branches, he will not spare you either.

22 Consider therefore the kindness and sternness of God: sternness to those who fell, but kindness to you,** provided that you continue in his kindness. Otherwise, you also will be cut off. **

Being cut off…equates to being removed from God, hence losing your salvation.

Or Hebrews 10:

26 If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, 27 but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God.

29 How much more severely do you think someone deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God underfoot, who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant that sanctified them, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace?

36 You need to persevere so that when you have done the will of God, you will receive what he has promised.

Perseverance is required.
 
Then explain:

Matthew 7: 21:
21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.

Or Romans 11:17-22

17 If some of the branches have been broken off, and you, though a wild olive shoot, have been grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing sap from the olive root, 18 do not consider yourself to be superior to those other branches. If you do, consider this: You do not support the root, but the root supports you. 19 You will say then, “Branches were broken off so that I could be grafted in.” 20 Granted. But they were broken off because of unbelief, and you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but tremble. 21 For if God did not spare the natural branches, he will not spare you either.

22 Consider therefore the kindness and sternness of God: sternness to those who fell, but kindness to you,** provided that you continue in his kindness. Otherwise, you also will be cut off. **

Being cut off…equates to being removed from God, hence losing your salvation.
I can’t believe what I’m seeing here. Do you understand that the word “fear” doesn’t have anything to be with being afraid of God. Far from it. It’s about awe when we consider our place within the Master’s universe and the respect for authority we owe God. To say nothing of the fact that Paul is talking about slaves in this passage and not a believers path of finding the Lord.

Romans 11 is a chapter about what? Do you even know? Quoting scripture within the context has always been important, is it not? Picking and choosing scripture can get people into real problems that can lead to spiritual darkness and it’s a dishonest way to handle the Holy Scriptures.

What would you say if I were to quote Luke 22 to try to prove that Peter wasn’t thought of more highly than the other diciples to prove that Peter did not found the church. You be calling me a heretic and saying that I was using scripture out of context. So tell me, how is using scripture outside of its context helpful?
 
I can’t believe what I’m seeing here. Do you understand that the word “fear” doesn’t have anything to be with being afraid of God. Far from it. It’s about awe when we consider our place within the Master’s universe and the respect for authority we owe God.

Romans 11 is a chapter about what? Do you even know? Quoting scripture within the context has always been important, is it not? Picking and choosing scripture can get people into real problems that can lead to spiritual darkness and it’s a dishonest way to handle the Holy Scriptures.

What would you say if I were to quote Luke 22 to try to prove that Peter wasn’t thought of more highly than the other diciples to prove that Peter did not found the church. You be calling me a heretic and saying that I was using scripture out of context. So tell me, how is using scripture outside of its context helpful?
Pardon me, but where does Romans 11 talk about slaves?
To say nothing of the fact that Paul is talking about slaves in this passage and not a believers path of finding the Lord.
I suggest you read all of Romans 11. You will see that it talks of the “saved” or chosen people and the gentiles, who will or can be grafted or “saved” into the vine. And what I qouted you makes no distinction that both the “saved” and gentiles can be cut off from the vine, or lose your salvation if one do not persevere, and continue sinning.

Look at verse 21: For if God did not spare the natural branches, he will not spare you either.

The “natural branches” equals those who consider themselves the “saved” or the chosen ones…and those unnatural branches will not be spared.

And this harmonizes very well with Hebrews 10.

So, please show me where I took it out of context?
 
OSAS started from Calvinism. Although Calvinists disown it.
A person can show no fruit in his or her Christian life because of the **‘event’ **of salvation when they got their lifeboat out of Hell and their ticket to Heaven. This ‘event’ is sealed and the Christian is “Once saved always saved”. What happens? I lose my fear of God. Why must I live a holy life? Why get upset over sin? The ‘event’ made me right. It creates a spiritual laziness. A presumption.
It creates a dilemma that must be explained. The Christian who “Falls away”.
In order to explain a “Christian” who falls into sin or has no spiritual fruit, they come up with another phrase: “never saved in the first place”. (NSITFP)
The ‘event’ really didn’t happen and must be replaced with a genuine ‘event’.
It is the ‘event’ that is at the heart of it all.
The foundation for many who accept OSAS is a fear of falling away. If salvation is a ‘one time “crisis” “event”’ that is in the past tense, and I believe I can never fall away because God said so (or putting words into God’s mouth) than I can never be convinced otherwise. To think otherwise is to doubt God.
Once I 'know 'I’m as ‘sure for Heaven as Jesus’, (actually heard a preacher say that once) I sit on my laurels and pretty much do nothing. Good works? Why? I’m heading for Heaven. It stifles any good done on this earth the end has already been decided.
IF HOWEVER, my entire foundation of salvation is incorrect, (a process, not a one-time event), than what the believer in OSAS is shaken. The whole house of cards comes crashing down.
 
Oh boy, here we go again! The “once saved always saved” folks will dig in their heels and quote scripture. The catholics among us will dig in their heels and quote scripture. What’s the point? No one is gonna bring the other side to their belief. Let’s just agree that we are all brothers and sisters in the Lord and leave the answer to this great question to God on judgement day. I have no doubt that He will enlighten us totally!
 
I didn’t say Romans 11 was about slaves. I asked you what the context of Romans 11 is since that is what you quoted.

The ‘slaves’ question is referring to Paul who is speaking about working out their own way in Ephesians 6.

I could have been more clear on what exact scripture I was asking about. My bad on that.

Let’s go on to Philippians 2 which is where I think you are probably heading. Do you see anything in that chapter that says you can lose your salvation? Here is the entire verse:

So then, my beloved, just as you have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but how much more in my absence, work out your salvation with fear and trembling;*** for it is God who is at work in you, both to will and to work for His good pleasure.,***

Anything there about having lost a relationship with Christ? We respond to Christ with fear and trembling. God is the one who does the work. Yes?
 
For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” Gen. 3:5 (KJV).
Malcolm Smith (a charismatic Episcopal priest) used to call the words of this verse, “ye shall be as gods”, ‘The Lie’.
The idea being that wanting to be ‘like God’ is the foundation of Original Sin. And what could be more ‘being like a god’, than having the knowledge of who goes to Heaven and who goes to Hell.
The ‘doctrine’ of ‘once saved, always saved’ (OSAS), otherwise known as ‘eternal security’ is an enticing philosophy that attracts people into a web that is hard to get out of.
This doctrine has a dark side. If I can ‘be sure’ who is going to Heaven (those who repeated a sinners prayer), than I can also be sure who is going to Hell (those who have not). This ‘knowledge’ of who is destined for Hell not only plays into the ‘Lie’ (using Malcolm Smith’s language), it also plays into a destructive psychological pattern.
There is a strange and sick satisfaction people have in ‘knowing’ their enemies are ‘burning in Hell’. It gives them a feeling of ‘justice’.
When some of the writings of Mother Teresa was made public, it revealed she had gone through (as St. John of the Cross did) a ‘dark night of the soul’.
Fundamentalists had a gleeful feeding frenzy. I remember one fundamentalist almost giddy with excitement: “See! This proves it! Mother Teresa is in Hell!!”.
It is extremely important to fundamentalists that Mother Teresa be in Hell. If Mother Teresa is not burning in Hell, that would make their belief/doctrine false; hence she must be burning in Hell.
A recent survey found 60% of “born-again Christians” say people were going to hell because they didn’t have the “right beliefs.” Whose beliefs are right is dependent upon the person you are talking to. Catholics are told (many times with glee) that it is ‘certain’ they are going to Hell.
It reflects a lack of compassion, hope, and love. It feeds into a person’s unforgiveness and bitterness toward another. In dehumanizing them with the curse of “They’re going to Hell,” it relieves them of any responsibility.
The Pharisees of Jesus day had a saying (from ancient Jewish writings): “There is joy in Heaven when a sinner drops into Hell.” Jesus turned that around and said: “There is joy in heaven when a sinner repents.”
The Pharisees believed in a kind of ‘OSAS’. Obviously Jesus did not.
“ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.”
The Lie.
 
OSAS started from Calvinism. Although Calvinists disown it.
A person can show no fruit in his or her Christian life because of the **‘event’ **of salvation when they got their lifeboat out of Hell and their ticket to Heaven. This ‘event’ is sealed and the Christian is “Once saved always saved”. What happens? I lose my fear of God. Why must I live a holy life? Why get upset over sin? The ‘event’ made me right. It creates a spiritual laziness. A presumption.
It creates a dilemma that must be explained. The Christian who “Falls away”.
In order to explain a “Christian” who falls into sin or has no spiritual fruit, they come up with another phrase: “never saved in the first place”. (NSITFP)
The ‘event’ really didn’t happen and must be replaced with a genuine ‘event’.
It is the ‘event’ that is at the heart of it all.
The foundation for many who accept OSAS is a fear of falling away. If salvation is a ‘one time “crisis” “event”’ that is in the past tense, and I believe I can never fall away because God said so (or putting words into God’s mouth) than I can never be convinced otherwise. To think otherwise is to doubt God.
Once I 'know 'I’m as ‘sure for Heaven as Jesus’, (actually heard a preacher say that once) I sit on my laurels and pretty much do nothing. Good works? Why? I’m heading for Heaven. It stifles any good done on this earth the end has already been decided.
IF HOWEVER, my entire foundation of salvation is incorrect, (a process, not a one-time event), than what the believer in OSAS is shaken. The whole house of cards comes crashing down.
Wow… I don’t think so. I’m a Calvinst and although we wouldn’t frame the argument as 'once saved, always saved, we believe that God will keep us as that’s what scripture says. We refer to it as “perseverence of the Saints”. Romans is exquisitely clear on this. We don’t however believe that salvation is necessarily a one time event. We believe it is sealed there if they are truly honest. But people who do not seek to live a Godly life couldn’t have been sincere about the Lord in the first place, so we’d call that a moment of weakness and not a truly life-changing event. People who truly accept the Lord WANT to do the right thing even though we are often emcumbered with sin.
 
Wow… I don’t think so. I’m a Calvinst and although we wouldn’t frame the argument as 'once saved, always saved, we believe that God will keep us as that’s what scripture says. We refer to it as “perseverence of the Saints”. Romans is exquisitely clear on this. We don’t however believe that salvation is necessarily a one time event. We believe** it is sealed there if they are truly honest**. But people who do not seek to live a Godly life couldn’t have been sincere about the Lord in the first place, so we’d call that a moment of weakness and not a truly life-changing event. People who truly accept the Lord WANT to do the right thing even though we are often emcumbered with sin.
You just repeated every point of the post, thus proving my point.
 
Non-denominational Protestant here. I’ve been open to listening to the Catholic point of view, reading, listening to Catholic Answers Live for about four years now. I feel I am on the verge of conversion, but I seem to have one thing that I’d really like to have cleared up before going forward.

Here’s my question. I’ve heard a couple of references to the fact that Protestants believe that once saved, always saved and that that is contradictory to Catholic belief. Protestants believe that our sins are covered; Catholics believe, as I understand it, that nothing unholy or sinful will be able to stand in God’s presence, that we must continually work towards holiness.

Could someone give me a bare bones bullet list of what Catholics believe on this issue? I am asking for something this simple because I seem to get lost in my research, wading through tons of apologetics against seemingly centuries old arguments, none of which I am familiar with. A simple bullet list of what is truth would give me something to hold on to and refer back to as I study this issue.

With much gratitude!
This is why Paul spoke in the book of Romans about the “obedience of faith” (Rom. 1:5, 16:26). It is not enough that one call Jesus Lord, for, as he said, “Not every one who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven” (Matt. 7:21; cf. Matt. 10:33, 18:35). If we are disobedient, God will “take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city” (Rev 22:19).

Just because you may choose to no longer hold fast to what was freely given to you does not mean that you were ever capable of earning what was given to you in the first place. The same is true of earthly sonship—it cannot be earned. But if you were adopted, you would be free to run away as a prodigal son and lose your inheritance.

What’s the history behind the teaching that you could lose your salvation?

The first person to espouse the idea of “once saved, always saved” was John Calvin in the mid-sixteenth century. Even Martin Luther didn’t subscribe to the theory. Prior to Calvin, the unanimous consent of the early Christians was that a person is capable of losing his salvation by committing mortal sin, as John spoke about in 1 John 5:16–17.

In the first century, the Didache, commonly known as the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles, said “Watch for your life’s sake. Let not your lamps be quenched, nor your loins unloosed; but be ready, for you know not the hour in which our Lord comes. But you shall assemble together often, seeking the things which are befitting to your souls: for the whole time of your faith will not profit you, if you be not made complete in the last time” (Didache 16 [A.D. 70]).

In the second century, Irenaeus wrote, “To Christ Jesus, our Lord, and God, and Savior, and King, according to the will of the invisible Father, ‘every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth, and that every tongue should confess’ [Phil. 2:10–11] to him, and that he should execute just judgment towards all. . . . The ungodly and unrighteous and wicked and profane among men [shall go] into everlasting fire; but [he] may, in the exercise of his grace, confer immortality on the righteous, and holy, and those who have kept his commandments, and have persevered in his love, some from the beginning [of their Christian course], and others from [the date of] their penance, and may surround them with everlasting glory” (Against Heresies 1:10:1 [A.D. 189]).

Such consistent testimony could be given from the dawn of Christianity until today, and no suggestion of “once saved, always saved” can be found on the lips of any Christian before Calvin.
 
This is why Paul spoke in the book of Romans about the “obedience of faith” (Rom. 1:5, 16:26). It is not enough that one call Jesus Lord, for, as he said, “Not every one who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven” (Matt. 7:21; cf. Matt. 10:33, 18:35). If we are disobedient, God will “take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city” (Rev 22:19).
From my perspective it’s just an attempt to shirk any personal responsibility and to make it all “100% God’s problem and job” to get one to heaven. So it becomes: “Just believe in Jesus AND believe in the doctrinal theory that one can’t ever be estranged from Jesus by mere sin or anything one can do.”
Personal responsibility. A foreign word in our day and age.
This is where the majority of evangelicals are at. Once I 'know 'I’m as ‘sure for Heaven as Jesus’, I sit on my laurels and pretty much do nothing. Good works? Why? I’m heading for Heaven. It stifles any good done on this earth the end has already been decided.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top