One of the men who threw the Idols (Pachamama) in the Tiber speaks!

  • Thread starter Thread starter IanM
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you ever were to kneel before a statue of Jesus, Mary(as a bride and groom sometimes do), etc, would you be kneeling because that statue is a god or goddess?
Of course not. We kneel and pray to what it represents.
Which brings back one of my questions…
Which member of the Trinity do you hypothesize the statue to represent?
 
Perhaps you should look at these as well.




 
If you ever were to kneel before a statue of Jesus, Mary(as a bride and groom sometimes do), etc, would you be kneeling because that statue is a god or goddess?
Well, no, but I do intend to be praying to whom they represent. Which if the statue were and idol still seems it would convey intent-to-pray.
 
Aside from the fact that you admit worship is going on, you are also creating confusion as I have no idea what you are talking about.
Where have I admitted worship was going on?
 
Of course not. We kneel and pray to what it represents.
Which brings back one of my questions…
Ok, so even thou they are kneeling before, they are NOT worshipping it. Thank you!!!
 
… the native woman who presided over the service, and Fr. Roberto Rojas, the priest who was interviewed by Rome Reports
and who was the organizer of the exhibit in the Church of Santa Maria in Transpontina. Both of them referred to the figures
as “Our Lady of the Amazon.”

 
Ok, so even thou they are kneeling before, they are NOT worshipping it. Thank you!!!
You should respond to what was written instead of what you wish was written.

Your celebratory exclamation could become a source of embarrassment.
We kneel and pray to what it represents.
Was written in response to the question:
If you ever were to kneel before a statue of Jesus, Mary(as a bride and groom sometimes do), etc, would you be kneeling because that statue is a god or goddess?
 
You should respond to what was written instead of what you wish was written.
Of course not. We kneel and pray to what it represents.
It’s not hard to understand.
It does not matter what it represents, saints etc. The fact of the matter is, the statue is NOT a god or goddess. Plain and simple. Am I right or am I wrong?
Are Jews guilty of idol worship because they bow at the Western Wall.
 
We kneel and pray to what it represents.
And this would include saints. But “pray to” is not actually correct. What the Church normally uses instead is the phrase “intercession of the saints” which is asking the saints for their intercession.
 
Last edited:
You did ask if we knelt before statues because they were a god or goddess.
If you ever were to kneel before a statue of Jesus, Mary(as a bride and groom sometimes do), etc, would you be kneeling because that statue is a god or goddess?
The answer is no, of course not.
We do not pray to statues, we pray to what they represent.
 
I grow bored with all of this.

The Pope told us all that it was a pachamama statue.
Pachamama is a pagan deity.

Therefore they are pagan idols.

One cannot escape the logic without calling into question the credibility of our Pope.
I am not going to do that.
 
One cannot escape the logic without calling into question the credibility of our Pope.
I am not going to do that.
Is that so?
Pope Francis specifically said it was done not with an idolatrous intent. So do you accept that or not?
 
Pope Francis specifically said it was done not with an idolatrous intent. So do you accept that or not?
Doesn’t matter.
The intent is not what is being argued.

What is being argued is what it actually is and what was actually done with it.
It is a pagan idol.
It was brought into the Church.
And it was eventually tossed into the river.
 
There are two ways idolatry can be committed.

First, by worshiping a statue itself or any other creature as if it was a god or goddess.

Second, by using a statue or some other object to worship a creature that the statue represents.

If worship is not being given to the pachamama statue itself, but to the mother-earth goddess which the statue represents, then idolatry is still being committed because the earth is a creature. Worship of any creature is idolatry.
 
If it doesn’t matter to you, then it’s just cherry picking…
“I’m not going to question the credibility of our Pope with things I agree with. But when its something I don’t like or I disagree with “It doesn’t matter””.
In other words you don’t believe him that it wasn’t done with an idolatrous intent.
 
If it doesn’t matter to you, then it’s just cherry picking…
No. It simply means it is not pertinent one way or the other.
“I’m not going to question the credibility of our Pope with things I agree with. But when its something I don’t like or I disagree with “It doesn’t matter””.
Trying to straw man again?
I never said I disagree with anything he said.
I simply stated that it is irrelevant if there was intent or not.
Intent is irrelevant in deciding if this is a pagan idol, if they brought it into the Church, and if it should instead be in a river.
In other words you don’t believe him that it wasn’t done with an idolatrous intent.
“In other words” is the red flag that should let you know you are using a straw man fallacy.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top