Exactly.The Pope called the little statues pachamama. The definition of a pachamama is a goddess.
Even without the ceremony, the Pope making this acknowledgement tells us what it is.
Exactly.The Pope called the little statues pachamama. The definition of a pachamama is a goddess.
Of course not. We kneel and pray to what it represents.If you ever were to kneel before a statue of Jesus, Mary(as a bride and groom sometimes do), etc, would you be kneeling because that statue is a god or goddess?
Which member of the Trinity do you hypothesize the statue to represent?
Well, no, but I do intend to be praying to whom they represent. Which if the statue were and idol still seems it would convey intent-to-pray.If you ever were to kneel before a statue of Jesus, Mary(as a bride and groom sometimes do), etc, would you be kneeling because that statue is a god or goddess?
Where have I admitted worship was going on?Aside from the fact that you admit worship is going on, you are also creating confusion as I have no idea what you are talking about.
Ok, so even thou they are kneeling before, they are NOT worshipping it. Thank you!!!Of course not. We kneel and pray to what it represents.
Which brings back one of my questions…
You should respond to what was written instead of what you wish was written.Ok, so even thou they are kneeling before, they are NOT worshipping it. Thank you!!!
Was written in response to the question:We kneel and pray to what it represents.
If you ever were to kneel before a statue of Jesus, Mary(as a bride and groom sometimes do), etc, would you be kneeling because that statue is a god or goddess?
You should respond to what was written instead of what you wish was written.
It’s not hard to understand.Of course not. We kneel and pray to what it represents.
And this would include saints. But “pray to” is not actually correct. What the Church normally uses instead is the phrase “intercession of the saints” which is asking the saints for their intercession.We kneel and pray to what it represents.
You did say ….You should respond to what was written instead of what you wish was written.
Your celebratory exclamation could become a source of embarrassment.
Of course not.
No one has claimed the statues to be god or a deity at all.It does not matter what it represents, saints etc. The fact of the matter is, the statue is NOT a god or goddess. Plain and simple. Am I right or am I wrong?
The answer is no, of course not.If you ever were to kneel before a statue of Jesus, Mary(as a bride and groom sometimes do), etc, would you be kneeling because that statue is a god or goddess?
Is that so?One cannot escape the logic without calling into question the credibility of our Pope.
I am not going to do that.
Doesn’t matter.Pope Francis specifically said it was done not with an idolatrous intent. So do you accept that or not?
No. It simply means it is not pertinent one way or the other.If it doesn’t matter to you, then it’s just cherry picking…
Trying to straw man again?“I’m not going to question the credibility of our Pope with things I agree with. But when its something I don’t like or I disagree with “It doesn’t matter””.
“In other words” is the red flag that should let you know you are using a straw man fallacy.In other words you don’t believe him that it wasn’t done with an idolatrous intent.