C
Cider
Guest
Yes, why do you keep condoning the violent acts of Martin? It’s a sin, unlike self defense which is supported by the CCC.To condone violence is a sin! And that’s what I see happening on this thread.
Yes, why do you keep condoning the violent acts of Martin? It’s a sin, unlike self defense which is supported by the CCC.To condone violence is a sin! And that’s what I see happening on this thread.
why do you insist on this slander?To condone violence is a sin! And that’s what I see happening on this thread.
Some prefer to point out the mote in your eye.Yes, why do you keep condoning the violent acts of Martin? It’s a sin, unlike self defense which is supported by the CCC.
Oh come April it’s kind of funny. It’s like when your kid keeps saying the same thing over and over again just to get attention.why do you insist on this slander?
Would you dare call it a Catholic virtue?why do you insist on this slander?
LOL I’ve actually had to open each post individually for the entertainment factor. My ignore list was already populated with the offenders.Everybody update your ignore list. That makes it easier to sieve through relevant posts.![]()
I imagine there was a deposition. That’s called basic legal procedure.Hmmm, In my opinion most of the comments about Ms Jeantel in this thread seems to show the complete disconnection to the cultural life of Miss Jeantel. It was shameful the way the defense lawyer badgered her and now we have discovered the defense interviewed her and knew her well before she came before the court.
Actually, we sometimes have a Christian duty to do violence. Not all violence is sin…not all inaction is commendable…sometimes it’s a sin to NOT act.I stand by my claim:To condone violence is a sin! And that’s what I see happening on this thread.
Oh come April it’s kind of funny. It’s like when your kid keeps saying the same thing over and over again just to get attention.
are we there yet?
are we there yet?
ARE WE THERE YET?![]()
how did the defense badger herHmmm, In my opinion most of the comments about Ms Jeantel in this thread seems to show the complete disconnection to the cultural life of Miss Jeantel. It was shameful the way the defense lawyer badgered her and now we have discovered the defense interviewed her and knew her well before she came before the court.
Most on my ignore list have been banned.LOL I’ve actually had to open each post individually for the entertainment factor. My ignore list was already populated with the offenders.
I probably only find it funny because my kids are adults so I haven’t had to deal with it IRL recently. So this thread is like flash back time to the same old antics. Ahh the memories.
Actually…concealed carry brings the crime rate down.And again, it’s Florida state law that’s really to blame in that it placed a concealed weapon into the hands of an amateur law enforcement personnel. We’re headed towards a society of gunslinging vigilantes.
Oh man, you are so going on BS’s sinful list now.Actually, we sometimes have a Christian duty to do violence. Not all violence is sin…not all inaction is commendable…sometimes it’s a sin to NOT act.
What facts are there that TM was the aggressor? The fact that TM had NO defensive wounds and GZ had plenty…the testimony given by GZ himself…and the testimony given by Rachel Jeantel stating that TM threw the first punch.I don’t have the answer any more than you do. What I have is an alternative scenario to GZ’s perspective. What facts are there that TM was the aggressor?
True. And Miss Jeantel showed a complete disconnection to the cultural life of court behavior. There is something missing in our government and educational programs that this generational disconnect is being perpetuated.Hmmm, In my opinion most of the comments about Ms Jeantel in this thread seems to show the complete disconnection to the cultural life of Miss Jeantel.
How dare you muddy up the fantasy time with cold hard facts.Actually…concealed carry brings the crime rate down.
Exactly.In fact, I think that case can be made, Zimmerman was found not guilty but his conduct is very much in question.