'Open up the conversation' on gay priests

  • Thread starter Thread starter fix
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Homosexuality is a dissorder…if I were a Bishop I would not ordain any openly homosexual man.
 
4 marks:
Its time to strike an orthodox balance between the pious pre-Vatican II traditionalists who would like nothing better than to bring back altar rails, cassocks, and the Latin Mass for the sake of an attachment to idealistic nostalgia, and the highly vocal and activist “Ivy league educated” progressives who want to impose an Episcopalian model upon us all.
Hear, hear! Orthodoxy is orthodoxy. It isn’t “traditionalism” nor is it “progressivism.”

I get a pain from both those groups - the ones who think the Church went south after VatII and the ones who think that VatII gave us free license.
 
40.png
rwoehmke:
It seems that their are many who would assume that homosexuality is a freely chosen life position. While the Vatican calls it a disorder, it seems to me that it has recognized that it is not a freely chosen disorder. Behavior is more or less freely chosen, but the condition is IMO not. Among the many births each year a fair large number of babys are born who have physical characteristics of both sexes. They have found that surgically placing these children in one sex or the other soon after birth is a mistake because in not a few cases the medically chosen sex has turned out to be wrong. The practice now is to wait and see how the brtain is wired, male or female, and then intervening surgically. That situation would seem to me to indicate that there may very well be people whose physical characteristics are in contradiction to how their brain is wired. I have only known two people in my life, both apparently male, who were homosexual. One admits but does not advertise his homoseuality. The other, a priest, I didn’t know was homosexual until after he died of AIDS. While he was alive he was troubled but was a wonderful compassionate priest.
Whether a disorder is chosen or not, it is still a disorder. Being wonderful and compassionate are not the only prerequisites of being a priest.
 
40.png
Richardols:
That there is such a thing as a homosexual is commonly accepted, though, apparently not by you.
It is also commonly accepted that sin is no big deal. What is commonly accepted is not what is true. God made them male and female. God deemed homosexual actions and any sexual activity outside marriage to be sinful. God made us. That’s the way it is.
40.png
Richardols:
You are presuming that homosexuals are all mental cases. I don’t think that the medical and psychiatric professions much believe that, though you can, if you want.
I don’t assume that all homosexuals are “mental cases.” I believe that people that commit homosexual acts and see them as normal and not sinful have a mentally impaired condition.

The medical and psychiatric professions are heavily influenced by the culture at large which has accepted that there is a material/physical order (because it can be defined and measured) but refustes to believe that the moral order is real (because it cannot be emperically proven).

When my doctor recommends that my daughter use birth control, the doctor remains a professional but is truly wrong.
 
Hi Guys!

If we are to adopt a rule for Holy Orders that creates in homosexual temptations an insurmountable impediment to ordination, how much initiative should the seminary go through to discover if its applicants are subject to the disorder? Self-testimony of the applicant would not be enough as any homosexual who applies, knowing the rule, is unlikely to be truthful about his own condition and doesn’t that, in and of itself, create an even more disturbing situation?
 
40.png
Brad:
Being wonderful and compassionate are not the only prerequisites of being a priest.
Quite right, another is celibacy. But, isn’t it as easy for a priest who is homosexual to be as celibate as a priest who is heterosexual?
But tell me, if people are worried about boys being around homosexual priests why aren’t they worried about girls being around heterosexual priests?
 
40.png
Norwich:
But tell me, if people are worried about boys being around homosexual priests why aren’t they worried about girls being around heterosexual priests?
Little girls have not been a target of most sexual abuse in the church; it’s been mostly teenaged boys.

People do take care about priests being around teenaged girls. Any priest in his right mind takes care about being alone with any woman. I’m no spring chicken, but when I meet with my spiritual director (a priest) we leave the door open.
 
40.png
Norwich:
Quite right, another is celibacy. But, isn’t it as easy for a priest who is homosexual to be as celibate as a priest who is heterosexual?
But tell me, if people are worried about boys being around homosexual priests why aren’t they worried about girls being around heterosexual priests?
Because the percentage of abuse on girls within the church is less than that which occurs in schools, camps, or elsewhere in society. The level of improper homosexual acts largely exceeds that which is found in general society.

In addition, the homosexual subculture in the Church has worked to defend and protect predatory priests that make regular used of child pornography and engage in many other illegal and immoral acts, while persecuting those that do not engage in these acts but speak out against them.
 
40.png
Richardols:
This “conversation” is nonsense.

Consider a parish with a heterosexual pastor, who is chaste, and an associate who is homosexual and also chaste.

Neither needs say what his sexual orientation is as he is faithful to the chastity requirements of his calling. None need question either man about his chastity or orientation.

If each is faithful, the question or the discussion should never arise.
You either forget or deny that homosexuality is a mental health disorder; even a ‘chaste’ homosexual is still irrational and has no business as a Priest, or in any occupation requiring emotional stability and clarity of thought.
 
**2358 **The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God’s will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord’s Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition.
  • Catholic Catechism
 
40.png
Brad:
Because the percentage of abuse on girls within the church is less than that which occurs in schools, camps, or elsewhere in society. The level of improper homosexual acts largely exceeds that which is found in general society.

In addition, the homosexual subculture in the Church has worked to defend and protect predatory priests that make regular used of child pornography and engage in many other illegal and immoral acts, while persecuting those that do not engage in these acts but speak out against them.
That is correct. A ‘straight’ semanarian who speaks out against the presence of homosexuals in his semanary, usually runs the risk of a poor evaluation by a liberal supervisor who either promotes homosexuality, or is a homosexual himself.

Homosexuals lie to get ordained, then you have homosexuals hiring homosexuals and protecting each other as a group.

Homosexuality is a mental health disorder characterized by severe denial, priapic narcissism, suicidal ideation, obsessive/compulsive behaviour, sado/masochism, and a self-interest that above all else. A celibant homosexual Priest doesn’t prevent a misanthropic behavior pattern.
 
Kevin Walker:
You either forget or deny that homosexuality is a mental health disorder; even a ‘chaste’ homosexual is still irrational and has no business as a Priest, or in any occupation requiring emotional stability and clarity of thought.
A mental health disorder? Excuse me, Doctor, for questioning your extensive medical knowledge, but I understood that the medical profession, in particular psychiatrists, no longer consider it so, or at least evaluate it on a case by case basis.
 
40.png
mercygate:
Little girls have not been a target of most sexual abuse in the church; it’s been mostly teenaged boys.

People do take care about priests being around teenaged girls. Any priest in his right mind takes care about being alone with any woman. I’m no spring chicken, but when I meet with my spiritual director (a priest) we leave the door open.
Precisely: Dr. Billy Ghram (I spaced out the spelling!) never enters a hotel room unless one of his aides goes in and checks it first. It’s that kind of caution that’s called for if we want to avoid scandals. I think that altar servers should be trained by married couples (yes, I know that married men and sometimes women molest children, but both of them as a married couple?), supervised by them, etc. The only time a priest should ever be alone with a child is in the context of the confessional and then the parents should have taken the kid to church in the first place and be waiting outside. Kids need to be around priests, but in numbers greater than, say, five at a time. I’m never alone in my classroom with a child unless the doors are open to the other classrooms and then I talk to the child by the door.
 
“A new Vatican glossary of sexual terms says homosexuals are not normal and that countries that allow gay marriages are inhabited by people with ‘profoundly disordered minds.’”

“The Lexicon On Ambiguous and Colloquial Terms about Family Life and Ethical Questions” says "homosexuality stems from an ‘unresolved psychological conflict.’"

"It says those who want to give homosexuals the same legal rights as heterosexuals ‘deny a psychological problem which makes homosexuality against the social fabric.’ "


April 1st, 2003
 
Excuse me for not citing the particular mental health organizations who deny that homosexuality is a mental disorder. (No denying that homosexuals engaging in homosexual practices is a mortal sin, but I’m speaking of psychological disorder.)

The American Medical Association
The American Counseling Association
The American Psychiatric Association
The American Psychological Association
The American Academy of Pediatrics
 
40.png
Richardols:
Excuse me for not citing the particular mental health organizations who deny that homosexuality is a mental disorder. (No denying that homosexuals engaging in homosexual practices is a mortal sin, but I’m speaking of psychological disorder.)

The American Medical Association
The American Counseling Association
The American Psychiatric Association
The American Psychological Association
The American Academy of Pediatrics
They are reconsidering their position in light of the wide spread homosexual abuse scandal in the Catholic Church, and plans are to revise the DSM to reinclude homosexuality. Homosexuals can’t rape teenage boys and get away with it.
 
Kevin Walker:
You either forget or deny that homosexuality is a mental health disorder; even a ‘chaste’ homosexual is still irrational and has no business as a Priest, or in any occupation requiring emotional stability and clarity of thought.
Your prejudices are showing!!

Try reading the CCC occasionally.

[2357](javascript:openWindow(‘cr/2357.htm’)😉 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms through the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained. Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity,141 tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered."142 They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.

2358 The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. (my highlights) These persons are called to fulfill God’s will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord’s Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition. [2359](javascript:openWindow(‘cr/2359.htm’)😉 Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection.

Note how it describes the ACT of homosexuality as being “Intrinsically Disordered” meaning inherent, assential, belonging naturally, against the inclination which is described as “Objectively Disordered” whiuch means external to the mind, actually existing, real. According to the CCC a “Chaste” homosexual can:
*By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection. *
Do you know more than the Church I wonder, do tell?
 
40.png
Richardols:
Excuse me for not citing the particular mental health organizations who deny that homosexuality is a mental disorder. (No denying that homosexuals engaging in homosexual practices is a mortal sin, but I’m speaking of psychological disorder.)

The American Medical Association
The American Counseling Association
The American Psychiatric Association
The American Psychological Association
The American Academy of Pediatrics
Which begs the question: What is a psychological disorder and how do you differentiate it from someone who is objectively disordered as defined by Catholic doctrine?

and:

Is it possible that something that is not considered a psychological disorder is not considered that because of political reasons? Would that have a bearing on what is classified as objectively disordered as defined by Catholic doctrine?

and…

Can an orientation be considered ‘normal’ and at the same time be considered by Catholics objectively disordered?
 
40.png
Norwich:
Your prejudices are showing!!
Homosexualilty is not a race, religion, ethnic group or the third sex, so I am showing no predjudice whatsoever.

Please read the Homosexuality thread on Catholic Information Forums.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top