Don’t think there is a perfect conscience.
Not sure what i would do in the scenario question. I think what we think we would do by just imagining it and when actually faced with such or similar situation are very different.
I agree. I think the scenario experiments have a lot of bugs in them. What I do think is significant, though, is that when people are forced between the two lousy choices, with everything else the same, there is a huge difference between the number of people who would hit a button causing a death and pushing an overweight person causing a death. People were very repulsed with the pushing part, it was a gut reaction against the pushing.
I would switch the train track and scream like crazy. It would be easier to get one person to jump than 5. And here’s another twist: would you jump in front of the train if
you were the heavy person? Would you push the heavy person if you went with him?
People are going to have different responses. This is not “relativism”, it is the reality that we all have different experiences and, therefore, consciences.
Bringing this back to the topic, though, the conscience is a gift from God, and I think is central to the notion of “original sin” if OS is defined as our “unworthiness”. (note: what I prefer is to say that “original sin” consists of all the drives we have that cause problems and we naturally come to resent, but that is not what I am addressing in this post.)
Can our conscience relate to a god who creates someone, and in his omniscience knows that his creation will choose to separate himself and live in misery forever?
On the other hand, does our conscience give us misery? Does it punish us in such a way, pouring guilt on us when we misbehave or disobey? Yes. Does our conscience make us feel good when we jump through all of its hoops? Absolutely. That is why, to me, the story of the tree of knowledge does not reflect God’s actions or behavior, but instead reflects the actions and behavior of the conscience He gave us.
And since grannymh and others didn’t come up with an answer, I will provide my own opinion as to why Adam ate the fruit:
Here goes. Please, anyone, feel free to comment.
Adam wanted power, he wanted status, and he had, like us, curiosity. He wanted to dominate. These are drives given to all of the higher mammals by our Creator. But there was something else involved.
Adam, all of us, want freedom. We want our autonomy.
So, as much as our consciences are vital and helpful, to some degree we resent our own consciences. Like I mentioned before, our consciences contain a rulebook. Rules always inhibit our freedom. Rules give us security, but the price is less freedom. God (as our conscience) gives Adam a rule. Adam, wanting freedom, breaks it. The conscience condemns him.
Is our conscience, God? This is where the answer is yes, and no. When we are children and young adults, our conscience is the first inner voice that we hear. As we become more self-aware, though, we also deepen our relationship with God. (Forgiveness and love play a huge role in this.) We can find that God is much deeper than our conscience. God loves us even when our conscience does not.
So, I look at the genius of the creation story is that the story reflects our own relationship with our conscience, and that the story also explains that our conscience came from God, just as every other aspect of ourselves. It would be really easy to think that the self-condemning aspect of our consciences (guilt) comes from an evil power, the devil. It does not. Our conscience is given to us by a beneficent Creator.
I am not pushing this as “fact” or the “way the our CCC should read”. I am saying that
today, this is how I can make sense out of the story of Adam, Eve and the tree of knowledge.