P
ProVobis
Guest
In fairness to Vatican II, they did make the wafer larger and stressed the importance of receiving hosts which were consecrated at that same Mass. These were not bad things. But when this “priesthood of the laity” was implied by the “spirit of Vatican II” the liturgy tended to get “banalized and desacralized.” Thus the reason why people begged for a return to the pre-Vatican II Mass and/or the rules associated with it. According to Cardinal Arinze, anyway.But this emphasis on temporal strictness is not everything and that was the problem with pre-vat II. It was more about how things were done, not why.
Everything was very enclosed.
Lots of people use Pre-Vat II, - I’m not saying you meant it like this - to excuse a lack of commitment to true Gospel values after a certain time. In fact Vatican II was a gift to the Church and a great blessing, and it wasn’t Vat II that in itself brought about a so-called lack of reverence, it was two background truths that these contrived misconceptions were manufactured to mask: