I believe we’re looking at a 10 year estimate and don’t give me **** about it, I never said it would magically pay off the deficit. Ryan’s plan doesn’t balance anything until 2050 or something and that is an even rosier estimate.
We won!! The campaign is over!! We get to call the shots!!
I remember your speaking of wanting to buy a handgun.Good thing us peeps who cling to our guns and religion are the more likely to vote.
No, can’t afford it. I got pepper spray.I remember your speaking of wanting to buy a handgun.
Looks like you have, Christine!
ComputerGeek25;9661990:
No they can’t. In most states, and certainly mine, if an insurance company wrongfully refuses to pay, they can be sued for “vexatious refusal to pay” and can be hit with severe punitive damages. Normally, all it really takes is a complaint to the Dept of Insurance and they’ll cave.That depends on the nature of the law.
Insurance companies cannot deny you for any reason they want.
Oh yes, they have their ways. Kinda like tax loopholes
I know a lawyer who does those things, and he knows.
And under Obamacare, it’s no different at all except that 17 million more people will be on Medicaid, which is a lot harder to challenge than private insurers.
And it isn’t my “opinion” that Obama didn’t want Obamacare. It’s just a fact. He wanted single payer and said so, and got it through the Democrat House. The Dems in the Senate wouldn’t pass it even though they had a supermajority. Reid and Pelosi then came up with “Obamacare” which was neither the status quo nor what Obama proposed, but a totally different thing. As I’m sure you know, most congressmen (and probably Obama) didn’t know what was in it until after it passed. It was not made available to individual congressmen in advance so they could read it. You may recall Pelosi’s comment that “we have to pass it in order to know what’s in it”.
Not a single Repub voted in favor of it. Not a single Dem who had actually read it voted for it, which probably none did, with the possible exception (though doubtful) of Reid and the members of his committee.
Try a gun store that sells used guns. You can usually find some bargains.No, can’t afford it. I got pepper spray.
? what are you talking about?
I understand your point given that anything worthwhile costs from $400 up and it’s something you really don’t want to invest it.No, can’t afford it. I got pepper spray.
Thanks!Try a gun store that sells used guns. You can usually find some bargains.
Really? Because the United States Congress Joint Committee on Taxation says it will only raise $46.7 billion over the next 10 years. That’s the biggest estimate out there, many are must smaller.
How can you support a class-envy tax hike which coves 0.7% of INCREASES to the defecit, and then claim “how can republicans, with a straight face, lecture about spending?” with a clear conscience??
What do they say, “Hotter than a $2 pistol”? That would be a bargain.Try a gun store that sells used guns. You can usually find some bargains.
Because 1908 people responded to the OP. Is this a trick question?
Of possible interest, I see where FNMA and FHLMC are having trouble paying the interest on their “bailout” funds from the government. They are, instead, being obliged to pay all their profit to the government and reduce their portfolio very substantially.
It may not even do that. There are estimates that it will actually be a revenue loser. When Obama was confronted with that, he said it was still okay because it would be more “fair”.
Actually the bulk of the bush tax cuts went to the poor and middle class. it lowered the minimum tax rate from 15% to 10%, it gave an additional 1,000 child credit for low income couples and gave increased education credits to middle and lower income people.If you do away with all the Bush tax cuts it results in a huge tax increase on the poor and middle class. You are correct that eliminating them only on the so called Rich will not produce a significant amount of revenue
When bankers get involved with the government, nothing good can happen.
Fixed