Ms. Pelosi can call herself whatever she wants. She is a Catholic by Baptism. But she is not free to redefine the Catholic Church’s actual teachings, and if she does, Catholics ought to correct her.
That’s what I’ve been saying all along. Or at least inform others about where she may be wrong.
We have all heard of Pelosi. When she says something, it gets written up in national news media and on tv.
So, I correct her. Does the Washington Post put it on the same location? Ha! They didn’t even come to the press conference! Neither did anyone else

And I bet they wouldn’t show up at yours, either.
Pelosi, *because of her visibility, *should be *more *responsible about what she says about the Faith. Right now, she is giving pretty much everyone the idea that it doesn’t matter what you believe. What, then, would be the point in becoming Catholic? It doesn’t really matter… you can believe whatever you want, whether you are a Catholic or not.
The issue is that Pelosi is an American, but she is also Catholic. Since she puts the fact of her Catholicism, such as it is, out there, she has to be not only American but Catholic as well. If she didn’t go around proclaiming that she is Catholic all the time, no one would really care what she says, except in a political sense.
People like you are allowing her to have the best of both worlds. Wow, cool, she is a Catholic! that’s a good thing, she must be a good moral person. But, she is the type of Catholic that gets to believe and do whatever they want. Wow, cool, she supports women’s “rights” to pay someone to kill their unborn babies! So she appeals to two sets of people, she gets elected, and her husband’s business gets yet another big boost. How incredibly comfy.
But could Pelosi get elected if she didn’t speak out of both sides of her mouth? Could she get elected if she kept her faith, such as it is, private, instead of proclaiming it in the national media? Probably not.
And could she get elected if she held Catholic positions? If she stood up and said, my Faith “Compels” me to be against sodomitic attempts at marriage?
I don’t think so.
So you may think that someone who runs on being an anti-war person who then turns around and says my anti-war philosophy “compels” me to vote for this war is *perfectly ok, *but i bet a lot of voters would not. I sure hope the voters of California see through this double-dealer and replace her with someone honest.