Perfume Created For Pope Benedict XVI

  • Thread starter Thread starter karaleigh
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
K

karaleigh

Guest
Pope Benedict has his own perfume! The news article says he will be the only person to wear the scent. Think he’ll send out swatches and save us a trip to Rome for the holidays? Personally, I doubt it, but I must remember scripture about doubt. Matthew 14: 30-31, … Lord, save me!” 31. Immediately Jesus stretched out his hand and caught him, and said to him, “O you of little faith, why did you doubt?"

Perfume Created For Pope Benedict XVI

He’s smelln’ it. :getholy:
 
The man does have style. I seldom pay attention to such things but I do remember some fashion types gushing about his shoes, watch, etc.
 
Scandalous, truly… and the sickening comment sections…
 
I think it’s scandalous if it is as reported.

Jim
We must remember, Jesus had perfumed oil rubbed into His feet. The disciple questioned that behavior too. I’d best sit and wait to see if we get swatches sometime in the future.

It said of the ointment ‘The Anointing Oil of Bethlehem’ or Bethlehem Oil that when homosexuals smell the oil’s scent the homosexual sees an angel. Perhaps the Pope, when getting a whiff of the stuff, has proclaimed it unfit for the churches ‘less-then-holy’ masses.
🤷
 
We must remember, Jesus had perfumed oil rubbed into His feet. The disciple questioned that behavior too. I’d best sit and wait to see if we get swatches sometime in the future.

It said of the ointment ‘The Anointing Oil of Bethlehem’ or Bethlehem Oil that when homosexuals smell the oil’s scent the homosexual sees an angel. Perhaps the Pope, when getting a whiff of the stuff, has proclaimed it unfit for the churches ‘less-then-holy’ masses.
🤷
Jesus did not have perfume rubbed on his feet. A woman with her own perfumed oil, performed the act out of love. Jesus did not go out and have a perfume designed for the woman to use.

Jim
 
I remember some years ago when I first got my laptop computer and was surfing the 'Net, I saw something on the former ‘American Papist’ blog about ‘The Pope’s Cologne’.

Only that this has something to do with Blessed Pius IX…
 
Jesus did not have perfume rubbed on his feet. A woman with her own perfumed oil, performed the act out of love. Jesus did not go out and have a perfume designed for the woman to use.

Jim
The perfume is a good idea. It shows the world that Catholics need not be stoics. Jesus did not ask us to be stoic and refuse all pleasures and wonders of the natural, God created world. The perfume has a scent of nature, which is a wonderful thing to behold.

Now, of course a left wing Trotskyite rag like the Guardian or HuffPo will try to spin this into something negative. If the Holy Father is not blowing the budget on this, but probably getting it for free or from his allowance, I don’t see a problem.
 
I would hope that thus has been mis-reported. I agree with the posters who say this is scandalous. This is another example of tone-deaf PR on the part of the Vatican. If the pope wants to do something like this, I’m sure there is a vast array of existing products for him to choose from in the fine shops of Rome.
 
Cologne is not only used directly on the body for others to smell, but is used on things like sheets and linens, towels, furniture, in bathwater, etc. because the person themselves like the smell. Why does everyone assume that the pope buying cologne equals the pope trying to get scandalous attention by giving off an attractive smell? Would it be horrible if he had candles burning in his rooms of which he liked the smell? He’s pope, but that doesn’t mean he’s allowed no pleasure in anything.
 
Cologne is not only used directly on the body for others to smell, but is used on things like sheets and linens, towels, furniture, in bathwater, etc. because the person themselves like the smell. Why does everyone assume that the pope buying cologne equals the pope trying to get scandalous attention by giving off an attractive smell? Would it be horrible if he had candles burning in his rooms of which he liked the smell? He’s pope, but that doesn’t mean he’s allowed no pleasure in anything.
WHo cares what the Pope uses it for.

Does the average Catholic in his flock, have personal custom made perfurme made?

If you believe this is inexpensinve, think again,

Heck, I’d gladly send him a gift set of Old Spice, if it meant a parish in my old city were to remain open

Jim
 
Personally, I think this was poor judgement if the story as reported is true.
 
Personally, I think this was poor judgement if the story as reported is true.
EWTN’s “The World Over” with Arroyo reported on the report. Im guessing if they were unsure of it’s credibility they would have made that known. But based on how it was presented, they seem to think it’s a credible story.
 
He’s pope, but that doesn’t mean he’s allowed no pleasure in anything.
He is also a secular priest (ie he has taken no vow of poverty). He is allowed to make money, and even spend it.

He has written prolifically over the years. A great deal of it goes to charity, but he does see revenue from it as well.
 
WHo cares what the Pope uses it for.

Does the average Catholic in his flock, have personal custom made perfurme made?

If you believe this is inexpensinve, think again,

Heck, I’d gladly send him a gift set of Old Spice, if it meant a parish in my old city were to remain open

Jim
Did I say I thought it was inexpensive? My point is that him owning it leads to no other fact than he owns some custom-made cologne. It’s not a sin to own cologne, even if you’re a Pope.

As far as how expensive it is, no, I don’t know. Do you know? Really? Exactly how much it cost? Let me know. You don’t know how much it cost, if it was a gift (many times these kinds of things are, it’s free publicity for the maker), or if he actually paid for it (because last I checked the Pope was still allowed to have this own money).

I don’t know what the “average Catholic” has of anything, and I realize it’s important that he appear to be wise with his money. But I would want to know a little bit more about the situation before accusing the Pope of scandal. Especially when the info is coming from publications like the Huffington Post, because, you know, they’re so pro-Catholic. I’m thinking that maybe you could calm down and disregard the media spin. You’re reacting exactly how they want you to.
 
He is also a secular priest (ie he has taken no vow of poverty). He is allowed to make money, and even spend it.

He has written prolifically over the years. A great deal of it goes to charity, but he does see revenue from it as well.
Exactly. We actually have several diocesan priests in our diocese who entered the seminary later in life and had high paying careers prior to becoming a priest. One worked in finance and the other was a doctor (a specialist). If you consider that they were single and worked these jobs for ten years or more, you’d think they’d have money saved up. And they do. There’s nothing wrong with that.
 
I agree with some of the posters here; This bad PR at a time when Europe and many other parts of the world are living with “austerity” measures. It just gives easy bait to the haters. So I see it as a bad move from an image perspective, rather than a statement of the man’s underlying priorities or values. Most likely, like his shoes, this was a gift but even if it wasn’t, as long as he bought it with his own money, I don’t see it as an issue.
 
I think it just shows a lack of “poverty of spirit,” which Jesus lived.

Remember, the Pope isn’t just a priest, he’s the Vicar of Christ, here on earth.

Would Jesus have designer perfume made for himself?

I think not.

Jim
 
WHo cares what the Pope uses it for.

Does the average Catholic in his flock, have personal custom made perfurme made?

If you believe this is inexpensinve, think again,

Heck, I’d gladly send him a gift set of Old Spice, if it meant a parish in my old city were to remain open

Jim
Well the Pope lives at the Vatican. You know JimR, if we sold it we could feed a lot of poor with that money. I’m sure guys like Bill Gates would buy up much of that Vatican art. Lots of money could be made.

Maybe your parishioners should help pay for your parish, u know. And if they can’t afford one, travel to a nearby one.
 
I agree with some of the posters here; This bad PR at a time when Europe and many other parts of the world are living with “austerity” measures.
Austerity measures? Well the Pope just helped create work for some people by requesting this cologne. A newspaper sold more copies because of this story. This is all work.
It stimulated the economy.

The Church has preached against materialism and it is materialism and greed of governments, individuals and corporations - such as Goldman Sachs or Lehman Brothers which led to this mess.
It just gives easy bait to the haters. So I see it as a bad move from an image perspective, rather than a statement of the man’s underlying priorities or values. Most likely, like his shoes, this was a gift but even if it wasn’t, as long as he bought it with his own money, I don’t see it as an issue.
The man’s whole life is devoted to God. He uses a perfume and it shows he is human and not someone the common man cannot relate to. Come on… Again I support the Holy Father in this. Good for him. And as for the haters, haters will always hate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top