E
Elizabeth502
Guest
No. That does not flow logically. Your assumption (not the Roman Church’s) is that equality is predicated on function, which it is not. A differentiation in function is not a differentiation in status.If someone said that women and men are equal but that they should not perform the same functions, such as women should not be allowed to drive or to vote, and men should not be allowed to do housecleaning or changing baby diapers, then how would someone respond to that?
Equality in the reliigous/spiritual realm is not related to function, but to the universally available spiritual generosity of God, by which all, equally, have the opportunity to attain holiness. (And further, that men and women, young and old, rich and poor, lay and clergy, are universally and without exception called to holiness.) Both the sons and the daughters of God are equally valued, we are taught. And that is where we should be deriving our identity and internalizing that identity. Our identity does not derive from our functions, nor does our value derive from our (differentiated) functions.
And if that were not true, then by definition clergy would have a higher spiritual status in God’s eyes simply due to function. Yet they don’t. Anyone who would claim that would be opposing Catholic theology. (This seems the appropriate week to insert Therese of Lisieux’s spirituality of “littleness.”) My gentle, tender, selfless Italian gardener has zero positions in the Church, yet, with the simplicity and humility of St. Francis himself, the man is surely entering heaven about 40 years before any individual man or woman I currently know, including those in the clergy or religious life.