T
TheRealJuliane
Guest
Why bother? She should just stop dating him now.Trinity333, you still need to ask him if he views pornography.
The answer is likely yes.
Why bother? She should just stop dating him now.Trinity333, you still need to ask him if he views pornography.
…telling me that women should feel ok being uncovered if men are allowed to wear only shorts in public.
You dress fine for the time. Certainly not like a nun. But jeans, a t-shirt, and high heels combined would have been considered sultry many decades ago. Then again… that’s a ways away from the beaches of Miami or the Brazilian bikini. Then again… a mestizo priest from Chile that lived for some years in Rio de Janeiro before moving to the U.S. told me that the bare skin of women exposed on the beaches of Rio are normal (by implications not sinful) to the Brazilians of Rio. He said the Chileans are more akin to Americans.What should I do? I dress mainstream but attractive… a jeans, tee, and high heels kind of gal. I am not a prude, I just have the facts of Church teaching, and he does not… and he is very much butting heads with me over this! How can I handle him so that I don’t lose him completely over this issue? I adore him otherwise.
Well… that may be like searching for a needle in a haystack in 2012 America.What should you do?
Get a new boyfriend. This one does not have virtue and holiness on his mind.
You use the term “slippery”, a very telling character flaw.
Honestly, I’d stop dating him. He sounds manipulative, dishonest and he seems like he views women as trophy’s.He purposely answers me in a very slippery way, which was entirely new to me… saying he doesnt lust much anymore, so it wouldn’t be a problem to see me like that… saying that he does not believe men are more visually wired than women… telling me that women should feel ok being uncovered if men are allowed to wear only shorts in public… saying that, even after a couple is married, the husband will want other men to be jealous of his wife (basically, that he would be proud if his future wife made other men jealous of his trophy)
What should I do? I dress mainstream but attractive… a jeans, tee, and high heels kind of gal. I am not a prude, I just have the facts of Church teaching, and he does not… and he is very much butting heads with me over this! How can I handle him so that I don’t lose him completely over this issue? I adore him otherwise.
A guy’s perspective here: if you’d “lose” him over being unwilling to do anything you were uncomfortable with, especially for moral reasons, then not only did you not have him to start with, but he is not mature enough for anyone to have in any meaningful way. Men don’t pressure women to do things like this. People who do are not men.What should I do? … How can I handle him so that I don’t lose him completely over this issue? I adore him otherwise.
Remember that matrimony is a holy sacrament. What do the 7 sacraments all have in common?..They are all designed to help us become better Catholics and move us closer to God. If you start to feel, at any point while dating him, that this man is not only failing to push you to become a better Catholic but is actually driving a wedge between you and God, then I think you have to consider that this relationship is not coming from God and you are likely not being called to marriage with him.He purposely answers me in a very slippery way, which was entirely new to me… saying he doesnt lust much anymore, so it wouldn’t be a problem to see me like that… saying that he does not believe men are more visually wired than women… telling me that women should feel ok being uncovered if men are allowed to wear only shorts in public… saying that, even after a couple is married, the husband will want other men to be jealous of his wife (basically, that he would be proud if his future wife made other men jealous of his trophy)
I disagree with those people telling the OP she should walk away. I say she should run away.Any man who tells you that men are not very much visually stimulated is lying to you.
A husband should want other men to lust after his wife? How evil is that?
I think that you are being tested. Don’t be fooled.
Yes, largely he is fooling himself and thinks you should be equally foolish or more.I believe it is more ignorance on his part than malicious… I feel he truly cares about me as a person very deeply. We are so extremely alike in so many ways… we are both conservative, pro-life, republican, very opinionated and so far these things have made our bond very strong. Its just this one issue…
The questions for yourself.I am dating a guy (he isn’t technically my bf but we have discussed the possibility of a relationship) who is extremely wonderful and so much like me, except for this exception: he seems to think it’s fine to be physically aroused so llong as one does not follow up with physical action.
It launched us into a heated debate, our first ever. (Btw, we are both mid-20’s)
I explained that the Church tells people to dress in a way that does not tempt the opposite sex to thoughts of fornication (or for married people, adultery) because you are responsible not just for your own sin, but also the sin of the person who lusts for you.
He purposely answers me in a very slippery way, which was entirely new to me… saying he doesnt lust much anymore, so it wouldn’t be a problem to see me like that… saying that he does not believe men are more visually wired than women… telling me that women should feel ok being uncovered if men are allowed to wear only shorts in public… saying that, even after a couple is married, the husband will want other men to be jealous of his wife (basically, that he would be proud if his future wife made other men jealous of his trophy)
What should I do? I dress mainstream but attractive… a jeans, tee, and high heels kind of gal. I am not a prude, I just have the facts of Church teaching, and he does not… and he is very much butting heads with me over this! How can I handle him so that I don’t lose him completely over this issue? I adore him otherwise.
Those are useless questions. This man is asking her to do something that goes against what she wants for herself. That is wrong, and shows that he is not concerned about her, but merely wants her to display her body parts to the world and other men so HE can show off his “trophy.” She doesn’t need to make any changes except DROPPING this jerk like a hot potato.The questions for yourself.
What is your personal religious morality about the clothings, the garments, in general?
What is your style of dresses? What is your style of long dresses? What is your style of short dresses?
What is your style of trousers? What is your style of long trousers? What is your style of short trousers?
What is your style of skirts? What is your style of long skirts? What is your style of short skirts?
What is your style of swimsuits? What is your style of one piece swimsuits? What is your style of two-piece swimsuits, (the bikini)?
It is up to you. That is your personal choice. Your own rule. Your personal will, not from his will. The moderation is the rule: not prudish, not puritan, not puritanist, not angelical, not victorian, not victorianist, not rigourous, not moralist, not liberal, not relativist, not porn…etc.
It is in function of temperature, of place, of activity…etc.
You decide.
Perhaps “normal” - but she doesn’t have to settle for someone who not only has low standards, but lowers her standards.Well… that may be like searching for a needle in a haystack in 2012 America.
He sounds like a normal young male to me. I’d be more concerned if he acted like a boy scout (goody two shoes), liked sipping soda out of the same can with her with two different straws, and preferred to spend much of their free time playing with little boys no biological relation to his.
I completely agree. I don’t think there is anything wrong with dressing to please your husband. Including looking ‘sexy’ in private - but this guy is a boyfriend asking the OP to look sexy in public firstly to show her of and I suspect from his remark about arousel for his own titilation.Those are useless questions. This man is asking her to do something that goes against what she wants for herself. That is wrong, and shows that he is not concerned about her, but merely wants her to display her body parts to the world and other men so HE can show off his “trophy.” She doesn’t need to make any changes except DROPPING this jerk like a hot potato.
Also, the clothing is only one element - he also is trying to break down her chastity by saying it’s OK to become aroused if nothing comes of it. But what do you bet that if she allowed him to “fool around,” he’d start saying that being aroused with no release is physically dangerous to his health??? So lame, and so corrupting.
By my message, I wanted only to say that she needs to know herself very deeply, in order to take her personal decision (to stop this dating or to keep doing this dating). For that, she has to ask yourself questions about different fields of the fashion of garments and the corollaries. After responding via her conscience, **she decides alone, without pressure. **Those are useless questions. This man is asking her to do something that goes against what she wants for herself. That is wrong, and shows that he is not concerned about her, but merely wants her to display her body parts to the world and other men so HE can show off his “trophy.” She doesn’t need to make any changes except DROPPING this jerk like a hot potato.
Also, the clothing is only one element - he also is trying to break down her chastity by saying it’s OK to become aroused if nothing comes of it. But what do you bet that if she allowed him to “fool around,” he’d start saying that being aroused with no release is physically dangerous to his health??? So lame, and so corrupting.
By my message, I wanted only to say that she needs to know herself very deeply, in order to take her personal decision (to stop this dating or to keep doing this dating). For that, she has to ask herself questions about different fields of the fashion of garments and the corollaries. After responding via her conscience, **she decides alone, without pressure. **
This " future potential boy friend "??? **has no right to pressure on her. He has to respect her personality, her essence, her human dignity, her feminity. **He has to avoid wrong mentalities of the world in one side( liberal, porn,…etc) and the other side (puritan, very strict), …etc: that is his duty. He has no right to control her.
He’s lying.I am dating a guy (he isn’t technically my bf but we have discussed the possibility of a relationship) who is extremely wonderful and so much like me, except for this exception: he seems to think it’s fine to be physically aroused so long as one does not follow up with physical action.
I agree. You are very young, and have your whole life ahead of you. I would love to spare you the pain and heartache that I have endured over the past 20 years as a result of marrying and having children with a man who, I finally now realize, is not really capable of true love, and left me a week before my youngest daughter’s 1st birthday. I’m not saying that the man you are with is this way, but a big RED FLAG went up immediately for me when I read what you wrote.I think you will find it is not “just this one issue”. It is an issue that permeates his worldview. In addition to this being a moral issue, it is also an issue of respect. He does not respect you as you are, he desires to change you to be something you are not comfortable with. Moreover, he seems unwilling to take “no” for an answer and respect your boundaries but continues to cajole and attempt to wear you down.
None of those traits are ones you should be desiring in a husband.
So, answer some questions: How does he lead you to be more holy? How is he leading as the spiritual head of your relationship? How is he responding to your attempts to help him be more holy? Does he attend Mass regularly? Does he have a prayer and devotional life outside of Mass? Does he practice stewardship of time, talent, and treasure?