He is better, vastly so, than the current occupant in the White House. It will be a long time
Oh I wouldn’t save your message because you haven’t sated as others have “Romney will definitely win by a wide margin”. You don’t seem to be so forward about it.
liberal group third way found republicans increased by 20000 since 2008, democrats declined by 20000
republicans lost 180000 voters since 2008, democrats lost voters 350000 in pennsylvania
ohio has lost 500000 since 2008, most in cuyahoga county which is heavily democrat
combine that with the fact that even the oversampled polls are showing republican enthusiasm is much higher than democrat enthusiasm. Cbs/ny times who predicts a larger democrat turn out than in 2008 for fl and oh and pa, says republican enthusiasm is 20 points higher than democrats in pa, fl republcians have 4 point advantage, republicans have 10 point advantage in oh
excuse me if i do not take the polls at face value
In polls…it isn’t a “race,” where you increase your lead and race toward the finish line. There is one vote…in November. Where they poll today is irrelevant.
Problem…triblive.com/home/2641005-74/obama-percent-romney-poll-voters-pennsylvania-leads-lee-margin-points
Within the margin of error
The funny thing about the debates is NO MATTER how they play out, LIberals will say that Obama won them.
As will the MSM
I’m confidently predicting a commentator will get a “tingle up his leg.”
Hahaha
Not this liberal- but I am no ideologue. If Romney seems to have done better in a debate, I would certainly acknowledge this.
Poll details: Obama 47%, Romney 48%. Second, Romney 48%, Obama 47%. Poll is based on blend of 2004 and 2008 turn outtriblive.com/home/2641005-74/obama-percent-romney-poll-voters-pennsylvania-leads-lee-margin-points
Within the margin of error
You see. You are already setting yourself up to state what you already know you will state.
Odd. When I look it up, it says “realist”.
That’s not the point - what individuals on CAF will do or others. The point is the mainstream media which is in the tank for Obama will favor him after the debates. If Obama loses, they will still find something from Romney they can use to make it the narrative after the debate. Just like they do with the middeast - Obama backpeddles - “the attack was because of the video…no, it was premeditated…but let’s talk about the video some more…my foreign policy is a success because I’ve defeated Al qaeda…wait, the attack was likely from al quaeda…” He has been all over the map on this - a Republican president doing this would be roundly criticized for doing the same things, but the MSM protects their own.Not this liberal- but I am no ideologue. If Romney seems to have done better in a debate, I would certainly acknowledge this.
I don’t alter my perception or presentation of reality to further an agenda. Not saying you do either, but some here are and will continue to.
Of course the media will bolster Obama regardless of how he performs in the debates. Media bias is so pro-Obama it makes me nauseous. Romney must fight the Obama campaign, Democratic and liberal super-pacs AND the mainstream media. Tough battle.
I just thought I would reply to your sweeping generalization of what “Conservatives” would do with an equally sweeping generalization of “Liberals.”Not this liberal- but I am no ideologue. If Romney seems to have done better in a debate, I would certainly acknowledge this.
I don’t alter my perception or presentation of reality to further an agenda. Not saying you do either, but some here are and will continue to.
And Fox and the Conservatives will say Romney won…your point?
Stating that the MSM is in the tank for Obama and will likely feel a “tingle up their leg” isn’t being an ideologue. It is recognizing reality…that most of our “journalists” are left-wing ideologues…