As far as a younger Pope is concerned… I guess that’s just a preference.
If Americans want a ‘liberal’ Pope, I guess the Church is already as liberal as it can be.
As Catholics, we have two “Pillars of Faith;” as it were. We have the Sacred Scriptures, and we have the Sacred Tradition. Since a pope SHALL NOT go against God’s Word (Scripture) or God’s Tradition. That leaves very little wiggle room.
With homosexuality, we only need look at Romans 1:24-27. A clear condemnation of that behavior. Any Christian should see that the inerrant Word of God forbids this. How can the Pope change this? He does not have the authority to do so. There is also nothing in our Sacred Tradition that could be even loosely interpreted as condoning this devience. To condone it would be heresy. Anyone who would still condone homosexual behavior clearly does not believe that the Sacred Scriptures are the inspired Word of God.
Women Priests cannot happen, either. Jesus commissioned 12 Apostles (who were all men) in Matthew 10:1-4. Although Jesus had many disciples who were women, it is clear throughout the Gospel that Jesus only shared His authority with the Apostles (Scriptural Law). The Apostles, in turn, followed Jesus’s example and continued to only ordain men (Tradition). Again, the Pope is powerless to change this in any way. Women have many roles in the Church; parish councils, education, Eucharistic Ministers, Religious Life (Nuns), and a multitude of other ways to participate in the Church.
I honestly think that the number one reason people clammor for a ‘blessing’ of homosexuality, and the ordination of women, is because the Church has said that they can’t have it. They want to bend God’s law to their own will. They think the Pope can change God’s rules. Hardly. The Pope is a teacher, and a caretaker. He is not, nor has he ever been, God.
The Catholics who want these things do not know their Faith.