Polls finds stark Catholic racial divide on Trump v. Clinton

  • Thread starter Thread starter ComplineSanFran
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Karen107 said:
I don’t think that will be a worry as African Americans are still a minority in the US. More of a problem are that Ohio is a swing state and he lost that state.
Click to expand...
Umm it’s a little bit of a problem that you guys are essentially saying “Man, if only there were fewer black people and more white people.”
 
Deep_Roots said:
Umm it’s a little bit of a problem that you guys are essentially saying “Man, if only there were fewer black people and more white people.”
Click to expand...
Deep Roots, I didn’t say that and please don’t take me out of context.
 
Karen107 said:
Deep Roots, I didn’t say that and please don’t take me out of context.
Click to expand...
Okay then. At the very least Trump supporters (and I apologize if I misjudged you as one) are at the very least LAMENTING his support among minorities, while simultaneously saying something like “there aren’t enough white voters to overcome” that.

Not, on one hand that’s a statement of fact.
On the other hand it’s a simply lament that there aren’t enough white voters to outweigh minority voters.
 
Deep_Roots said:
Okay then. At the very least Trump supporters (and I apologize if I misjudged you as one) are at the very least LAMENTING his support among minorities, while simultaneously saying something like “there aren’t enough white voters to overcome” that.

Not, on one hand that’s a statement of fact.
On the other hand it’s a simply lament that there aren’t enough white voters to outweigh minority voters.
Click to expand...
What?:confused:

I am a Trump supporter. I don’t lament minority support, I welcome it. I’m sure HRC is lamenting minority support of Trump, though.😉
 
Deep_Roots said:
I’m sorry. I mean lamenting the lack of support among minorities.
Click to expand...
Ahh, ok. Thanks for the clarification.

Although I read that his support among Hispanics is ahead of McCain and Romney, and just behind JWB’s. FWIW
 
Karen107 said:
Sir my father was a WWII Vet, a doctor who came up the beaches of Normandy with the American Soldiers and also went into Japan post Hiroshima to help… Now, if he differentiated who he helped based on race, including those he cared for stateside in the wartorn areas of Chicago, than he wouldn’t be Christian now would he? And I hope that gives you some indication as to how many elections I voted in, and how it matters not to me whether I have to move over to accommodate those who just want a shot at a better life in the United States…Not sounding too conservative right winged am I?..

Now Sir, if you are so against bringing in more into this nation, how could you say you are pro-life? Don’t all lives matter, not just the unborn? I am pro-life in all aspects of life, that’s the legacy I received from my dad. I choose to serve God over man and many of our politicians today don’t. This isn’t survival of the fittest, it’s about doing what morally right. Therefore as long as politics is polarizing everyone into a far left or far right position…, I stay in the middle which I believe is where I should be as a Christian which makes voting very difficult for me… I will vote, but since there aren’t a lot of good presidential candidates, I hope who I vote for besides the President will make a difference. Certainly the climate being created by both parties is terrible…
Click to expand...
First off thank you for saying " sir" in your response. It affords me the respect I’m due. I’ve had people disagree with “dude” and though I use that word often, it’s so off putting in a disagreement.
I would try a gender appropriate response but these days that could start a riot!
Now, I’m so confused by you. You rail against trump and lump being nice to people as “pro life” yet you say you have voted in elections? I find that odd. There has not been a single pro life candidate by your definition in the history of the world.
Now, one candidate says, “killing babies is something I support” and the other says “we should protect our country and let other counties protect theirs all the while legally bringing in people who can survive here and work to a common good”

Ok maybe you disagree but those are not equivalent “pro life” things. Tell you what, you can vote all you want for laws to help illegal immigrants but we have to have a safe border. There is no safety in this country for all you describe. Not in a world of terror, guns, and drugs.
A wall is pro life because it protects our life.

I’m glad you father was fortunate enough to be born in America so he could be on the right side of history. But shame for your use of Godwin’s law and invoking hitler and trump. That is an emotional rhetoric being used by the never trump crowd or the closet Hillary supporters.

You still will not give a single candidates name.
Who have you voted for in good conscience.

Why is your rhetoric of trump not matched by a disdain for a far more less moral and anti life candidate.

What did you think of trumps short list of judicial pics?

The next president will probably pic 3 supremes. I do thank Ginsburg for reminding if that, even if it was in a way that a supreme should not stoop to.
 
Hoosier_Daddy said:
First off thank you for saying " sir" in your response. It affords me the respect I’m due. I’ve had people disagree with “dude” and though I use that word often, it’s so off putting in a disagreement.
I would try a gender appropriate response but these days that could start a riot!
Now, I’m so confused by you. You rail against trump and lump being nice to people as “pro life” yet you say you have voted in elections? I find that odd. There has not been a single pro life candidate by your definition in the history of the world.
Now, one candidate says, “killing babies is something I support” and the other says “we should protect our country and let other counties protect theirs all the while legally bringing in people who can survive here and work to a common good”

Ok maybe you disagree but those are not equivalent “pro life” things. Tell you what, you can vote all you want for laws to help illegal immigrants but we have to have a safe border. There is no safety in this country for all you describe. Not in a world of terror, guns, and drugs.
A wall is pro life because it protects our life.

I’m glad you father was fortunate enough to be born in America so he could be on the right side of history. But shame for your use of Godwin’s law and invoking hitler and trump. That is an emotional rhetoric being used by the never trump crowd or the closet Hillary supporters.

You still will not give a single candidates name.
Who have you voted for in good conscience.

Why is your rhetoric of trump not matched by a disdain for a far more less moral and anti life candidate.

What did you think of trumps short list of judicial pics?

The next president will probably pic 3 supremes. I do thank Ginsburg for reminding if that, even if it was in a way that a supreme should not stoop to.
Click to expand...
I’m just curious concerning where Hitler and Trump were invoked in this post?
 
Karen107 said:
Actually Obama changed his mind on a lot of things after the election. It happens just as you say. I don’t trust Trump for a second. Historically he’s got a ruthless history of being a businessman, he’s got the makings of a Hitler and I’m not falling for it…
Click to expand...
Post 78
 
Hoosier_Daddy said:
I reposted it. It’s part of the ongoing conversation.
Click to expand...
You betcha! lol

The point being that people supported Hitler who sold them a bill of goods until he was in power and in complete control of the situation. He’s right the people who follow him are very loyal…

… even to the point of selling their souls. Honestly I don’t know how americans can be falling for this guy, except theres probably that many people who are just like him… 😦
 
meltzerboy said:
However, Hitler did a bit more than that.
Click to expand...
Like building walls? Like the Berlin Wall? or the wall Trump wants to build between the US and Mexico? Leader of the free world has access to things that only a responsible person should have access to, not one who shows himself like Trump shows himself…
 
Karen107 said:
Like building walls? Like the Berlin Wall? Leader of the free world has access to things that only a responsible person should have access to, not one who shows himself like Trump shows himself…
Click to expand...
Hitler did not build the Berlin Wall. The Soviet and East German communists built it in 1961. It was supposed to prevent fascist ideals from West Germany from entering the Eastern Bloc. The Berlin Wall was effectively punishment for losing World War II.
 
Karen107 said:
Like building walls? Like the Berlin Wall? or the wall between the US and Mexico? Leader of the free world has access to things that only a responsible person should have access to, not one who shows himself like Trump shows himself…
Click to expand...
I’m no Trump supporter but Trump cannot and should not be compared to Hitler.
 
anon67074017 said:
Hitler did not build the Berlin Wall. The Soviet and East German communists built it in 1961. It was supposed to prevent fascist ideals from West Germany from entering the Eastern Bloc. The Berlin Wall was effectively punishment for losing World War II.
Click to expand...
Well thank goodness you knew that… but… punishment for WWII and Hitler had nothing to do with it?
 
meltzerboy said:
I’m no Trump supporter but Trump cannot and should not be compared to Hitler.
Click to expand...
I beg to differ… this is the leader of the free world who would be the head of state, Commander in Chief, and all that, and he’s already spoken out how he feels about people who are not US citizens… He’s gone back and forth on his abortion stance… I could go on and on about how he’s treated people who have worked for him. As I said before hes in it to win it… those who stand in his way just better look out…He’ll just stand up and say “you’re fired!” I would say it’s almost comical if I weren’t talking about the Presidency.
 
Karen107 said:
I beg to differ… this is the leader of the free world who would be the head of state, Commander in Chief, and all that, and he’s already spoken out how he feels about people who are not US citizens… He’s gone back and forth on his abortion stance… I could go on and on about how he’s treated people who have worked for him. As I said before hes in it to win it… those who stand in his way just better look out…
Click to expand...
Which presidential candidate is not “in it to win it”? Certainly Hillary Clinton is, as well as Trump. (I wasn’t too sure about GWB, however, with regard to whether he really wanted to be President.)

Hitler was responsible for murdering millions of people and devastating whole countries. He was an evil person. How can you compare him to Trump?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top