Pope Bluntly Faults Church's Focus on Gays and Abortion

  • Thread starter Thread starter AdvanceAlways
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m curious. Does anybody really think that Pope Francis is saying that abortion is not morally wrong? That it isn’t as important as 'feeding the poor?" That it’s all about the woman’s ‘right to choose’? That somehow this teaching of the Church isn’t a ‘real teaching’ and Pope Francis is recognizing that? That the death of millions and millions of children is not ‘important’ and that trying to help women (and their children, and their fathers too) by helping the mother AND the child by choosing life (which is what thousands of pro-life people and places have been offering for decades) isn’t necessary because abortion isn’t really that wrong?
No, he’s not saying that, but he is right to say that the **pro-life political movement **is not as important as Gospel preaching.

What welcomes people to the Church, the former or the latter?

What changes people’s behavior, the former or the latter?
 
The unborn do not have rights under the Constitution, and they do not have the capacity to make choices, so their “choice” is irrelevant.

It can be argued that forcing women to suffer through unwanted pregnancy and raising children under poor, deprived conditions is morally evil.
God help you.

I notice you still don’t answer me. You don’t think that killing the unborn deprives them of life?

So Cali, if I happen to suffer a stroke and can’t speak (aphasia) or develop dementia and can’t make a ‘choice’ to the knowledge of the ‘state’, can my next of kin, or the State, go ahead and kill me even if I haven’t chosen to die?
 
No, he’s not saying that, but he is right to say that the **pro-life political movement **is not as important as Gospel preaching.

What welcomes people to the Church, the former or the latter?

What changes people’s behavior, the former or the latter?
Excuse me, but your calling pro life people a ‘political movement’ doesn’t make them solely a political entity, nor does the pro life message contradict gospel teaching.

How many aborted children are welcomed into the church?
 
Whoops, we’re in danger of going off track here.

If any more comments are made about abortion itself, I think a separate thread should be opened, so we can focus on this thread and what the media said Pope Francis said (as well as what he actually said). So, no more response from me off topic on this thread.
 
I’m curious. Does anybody really think that Pope Francis is saying that abortion is not morally wrong? That it isn’t as important as 'feeding the poor?" That it’s all about the woman’s ‘right to choose’? That somehow this teaching of the Church isn’t a ‘real teaching’ and Pope Francis is recognizing that? That the death of millions and millions of children is not ‘important’ and that trying to help women (and their children, and their fathers too) by helping the mother AND the child by choosing life (which is what thousands of pro-life people and places have been offering for decades) isn’t necessary because abortion isn’t really that wrong?
I don’t know what “anybody” thinks, but I think the Holy Father has a handle on it. He does, after all, have the attention of the Holy Spirit. He made it clear that he was a "son of the Church’. He also made it clear that being my way or the highway is not exactly a recipe for success. ( in his humble opinion)
 
God help you.

I notice you still don’t answer me. You don’t think that killing the unborn deprives them of life?

So Cali, if I happen to suffer a stroke and can’t speak (aphasia) or develop dementia and can’t make a ‘choice’ to the knowledge of the ‘state’, can my next of kin, or the State, go ahead and kill me even if I haven’t chosen to die?
Yes it’s off topic, but this is why euthanasia rights are recognized in many places as well. Is forcing people to suffer from painful, incurable medical conditions morally good?

There are times when depriving people of life is sanctioned.
 
I don’t know what “anybody” thinks, but I think the Holy Father has a handle on it. He does, after all, have the attention of the Holy Spirit. He made it clear that he was a "son of the Church’. He also made it clear that being my way or the highway is not exactly a recipe for success. ( in his humble opinion)
I think that Pope Francis is doing just fine, but then again, I’m going by what he actually said, in context, and not on what the ‘headline’ (which is the thread title) and that article said he said. Pope Francis, I’ve said before and will say again, is not saying or doing anything that Benedict or John Paul 2 didn’t say or do. He isn’t changing teachings or saying that homosexual behaviors (not people) aren’t intrinsically wrong, or that we don’t need to keep teaching truth. He isn’t saying that in order to welcome people into the Church we need to tell them that their actions are all good, even if they’re not, so that once we ‘hook’ them we can start to ‘teach them’. He’s saying that AS we speak the truth we need to do it in love, and that’s what the Church has taught all along.
 
Excuse me? I AM a woman. I raised three children and I’m raising an infant and toddler grandson right now because their MOTHER made her ‘choice’ to leave them with my son.

You are doing a wonderful thing.
 
Yes it’s off topic, but this is why euthanasia rights are recognized in many places as well. Is forcing people to suffer from painful, incurable medical conditions morally good?

There are times when depriving people of life is sanctioned.
open a thread and we’ll discuss it. . .because the Church (and I, its humble daughter) beg to disagree on euthanasia.
 
I think that Pope Francis is doing just fine, but then again, I’m going by what he actually said, in context, and not on what the ‘headline’ (which is the thread title) and that article said he said. Pope Francis, I’ve said before and will say again, is not saying or doing anything that Benedict or John Paul 2 didn’t say or do. He isn’t changing teachings or saying that homosexual behaviors (not people) aren’t intrinsically wrong, or that we don’t need to keep teaching truth. He isn’t saying that in order to welcome people into the Church we need to tell them that their actions are all good, even if they’re not, so that once we ‘hook’ them we can start to ‘teach them’. He’s saying that AS we speak the truth we need to do it in love, and that’s what the Church has taught all along.
I don’t understand the need to defend the previous popes. Just because Francis does things and says things that people like does not diminish the impact of John Paul and Benedict. What is going on here?
 
open a thread and we’ll discuss it. . .because the Church (and I, its humble daughter) beg to disagree on euthanasia.
You are right. I said the exact same thing in another thread and got accused of not having evidence to support my argument.
 
The Pope brought politics up, himself, when he said he was not a bureaucrat nor a right winger. He wanted to distance himself from politics. He also realized that being authoritarian was not his best move.
While he wants to be distanced from politics himself, he does not want us to be. In fact he recently called for the laity to be more involved in politics. Nowhere has he said that the Church should not take a position on moral issues that enter the political arena.

ncregister.com/daily-news/pope-calls-faithful-to-participate-actively-in-politics
 
That is why Catholics come to Evangelical churches and feel they are experiencing God and His love for the first time. At a Protestant church.
10. Finally, we have a pope that is recognizing this, and moving the Catholic church into a new direction. This change is necessary, otherwise the CC will be an irrelevant, remnant, dead church.

Will practicing Catholics please agree that Gospel preaching is more important than politics, which is what Francis is saying.
I agree that Gospel preaching is more important than politics, but the Eucharist is the source and summit of Christian life. So while Bible education, preaching, teaching, and fellowship are all good things that you can also find in the Catholic Church, you will never find God in the Eucharist at an Evangelical church.

Practicing Catholics need to encourage those who are wandering to come home and with warm welcome help them to find God. That is how we move forward.
 
Yes, the rights of women not to be victimized by the consequences of an unwanted pregnancy. The understanding that children are an economic, social, and career burden. The understanding that pregnancy affects the health of women. The understanding that it is evil to force women to bear children, and evil to let children be born under unwanted, poor conditions. The understanding that women are intelligent enough to make intelligent choices about their life and health. The understanding that men do not fully understand pregnancy, and that women cannot be pressured by a male-dominant society to have children against their will.

Yes, abortion is a human rights issue.

You should thank God that Francis will likely not judge women who have had abortions.
I think it is safe to say, from a political standpoint, Pope Francis would still support efforts to make abortion illegal. He recognizes that women should not have the “right” to kill their own child.
 
No, he’s not saying that, but he is right to say that the **pro-life political movement **is not as important as Gospel preaching.

What welcomes people to the Church, the former or the latter?

What changes people’s behavior, the former or the latter?
Sure, but we should do both - preach the Gospel and act politically. We have that ability. In fact, if we vote contrary to Church teaching, we aren’t living or preaching the Gospel.
 
Sure, but we should do both - preach the Gospel and act politically. We have that ability. In fact, if we vote contrary to Church teaching, we aren’t living or preaching the Gospel.
Explain why voting has any relationship with living/preaching the Gospel.
I agree that Gospel preaching is more important than politics, but the Eucharist is the source and summit of Christian life. So while Bible education, preaching, teaching, and fellowship are all good things that you can also find in the Catholic Church, you will never find God in the Eucharist at an Evangelical church.
Yes, but the CC can’t rest on its laurels and say they’re doing good enough since the Eucharist is there. Evangelicals don’t believe in Real Presence, but Evangelicals would say that God is definitely present in their churches through other means.
 
The concept of mercy as applied to God in a theological sense is an example of Church doctrine that is different from the moral teaching that as Christians we should be merciful in our interactions with others. They are not the same thing at all. Furthermore, the second is derived from the first and only makes sense in light of the Gospel message.

This is what Pope Francis means when he says, “The dogmatic and moral teachings of the church are not all equivalent.” – Primacy belongs to theological doctrines, such as “God is merciful”, rather than the moral teachings that are derived from them.

“The most important thing is the first proclamation: Jesus Christ has saved you.”

Obsessing over moral teaching and forgetting to preach the Gospel gets things backwards. Pope Francis sees this as counter-productive. **What I hear him saying is that we must first change hearts and minds by proclaiming the Gospel and THEN moral behavior will follow.

Of course, this is what liberal-minded Catholics have been saying all along. **😃
Not exactly! Of course that depends on how “liberal-minded” the person is. The “liberal-minded” Catholics around here are for abolishing some the moral aspects of the Faith. They have no interest whatsoever in an eventual adherence to moral teaching. They actually promote changing the teaching.

Evidently, things vary greatly according to where one lives.
I would agree. I would also add that politically liberal Catholics use the above bolder comments by bellasbane to justify support of laws (abortion, gay “marriage,” etc.) which I highly doubt the Holy Father would be in favor of.

It all depends on what your definition of “liberal Catholic” is. I have known liturgically traditionalist Catholics who are politically liberal. 🤷
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top