S
StudentMI
Guest
Yes that may be the source of the angst. Very perceptive thought.
Yes that may be the source of the angst. Very perceptive thought.
Clarification. Is that one of the theological virtues? It’s good to know truth. It’s even better to know Christ who is the truth.goout:
The pope has said some controversial things that need clarification. The world would not be having this discussion if it were not so.Pope Francis needs to be excused for something.
Christ always condemned the sin and said sin no more, why do we forget thisChrist did the same thing, without concern for what religious establishment thought of his fastidiousness to dogma (Christ is, of course, dogma incarnate).
It is bad when the discussion is used by some, even if it is the laity or non-believer, as church acceptance of immoral behaviorClarification. Is that one of the theological virtues? It’s good to know truth. It’s even better to know Christ who is the truth.
And in your eyes, is it good or bad that the world is having this discussion?
Because it’s not entirely accurate. “hacer” can mean “to do” (and you get that awkward English phrase when you translate it that way), but it also means “to make”, and that makes more sense/is more natural.I’m curious, where did you get this translation? Even in English, it’s syntactically awkward.
Yes, I provided my own translation in a post above. The phrases before and after do provide the necessary context. And, I’ve been visiting Argentina websites this morning describing the requirements for “justicia cerca vivimos juntos.” It’s plain enough when one reads an entry on the requirements (requisitos) “para ser una unión convivencial.” One of them plainly says “de igual or distinto sexo.” Convivencia, for Argentinos, does mean living together.Because it’s not entirely accurate.
The internet.How come the two previous Pope’s never seemed to have this problem?
You speak as if the Pope is pro-sin.goout:
Christ always condemned the sin and said sin no more, why do we forget thisChrist did the same thing, without concern for what religious establishment thought of his fastidiousness to dogma (Christ is, of course, dogma incarnate).
It is bad when the discussion is used by some, even if it is the laity or non-believer, as church acceptance of immoral behaviorClarification. Is that one of the theological virtues? It’s good to know truth. It’s even better to know Christ who is the truth.
And in your eyes, is it good or bad that the world is having this discussion?
I can see how you may think that but I don’t think it only makes sense in the context of civil unions. There should be legal protections from discrimination. I think that’s what Pope Francis was saying.And for anyone who doubts that he meant “civil union”, the next sentence can only make sense if he’s talking about civil unions:
“They have the right to be covered legally,” said Pope Francis. “I defended that.”
Then how do you explain convivencia civil? I don’t speak Spanish fluently, but I do know some, and aside from little tweaks I’d have made in my translation, I think the transitions I’ve seen here so far are accurate, and I don’t see how else you can read convivencia civil, especially if that’s how Argentineans use it. Do you speak Spanish?I can see how you may think that but I don’t think it only makes sense in the context of civil unions. There should be legal protections from discrimination. I think that’s what Pope Francis was saying.
I think it fair for everyone to ask themselves if they have followed this teaching.2478 To avoid rash judgment, everyone should be careful to interpret insofar as possible his neighbor’s thoughts, words, and deeds in a favorable way:
I don’t speak Spanish but unión convivencial is not the same as convivencia civil.It’s plain enough when one reads an entry on the requirements (requisitos) “para ser una unión convivencial.”
Neither do I but it isn’t the same as unión convivencial.Then how do you explain convivencia civil ? I don’t speak Spanish fluently
Yes, Christ went to meet sinners where they were, however He told them to “go and sin no more” He did not say “hey I’m gonna change the rules to make it OK for you guys to keep on sinning”.Christ did the same thing, without concern for what religious establishment thought of his fastidiousness to dogma (Christ is, of course, dogma incarnate).
Yes I think most have, but we can also use our good judgment to determine what one means and one doesn’t mean and when one continues to make scandalous statements over and over again we must eventually take him at his word instead of making excuses.I think it fair for everyone to ask themselves if they have followed this teaching.
Respecting a child’s dignity means affirming his or her need and natural right to have a mother and a father”.
In discussing the dignity and mission of the family, the Synod Fathers observed that, “as for proposals to place unions between homosexual persons on the same level as marriage, there are absolutely no grounds for considering homosexual unions to be in any way similar or even remotely analogous to God’s plan for marriage and family”.