Pope Declares-Non Catholics Do Not Possess the Full Truth

  • Thread starter Thread starter traditionalgal
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
i had the franciscians for grades 1 thru 8. grades 9-12, the jesuits. and college the jesuits. 8 + 4+ 4 = 16
So you went to Catholic schools.

Does this mean that you actually took Catechism classes? Or does it mean that you just did your ABCs in a room with a crucifix on the wall? Because it doesn’t seem as though you know very much about Catholicism.

(I attended a Marxist school, but I don’t know very much about Marxism because I didn’t take very many of the philosophy classes, and of the few I took, I don’t remember very much of the content - I was a lot more interested in Christianity, at the time.)
 
Originally Posted by guanophore
If you believe these verses apply to Roman Catholics, believers, why are you here?
Originally posted by believers
I’m planting seeds.
Be careful then of the fertilizer you choose.

Seriously --I mean really – there is a difference between dialoging with someone who disagrees with your beliefs, and attempting to present your own belief in a way which will ‘plant a seed’ which leads the person to search his/her beliefs in a spirit of genuine obedience to God and hunger to be guided into deeper knowledge of truth. …

and attempting to shove opinions down others’ throatswhich you know are not held by the majority on a forum, by incessant mocking, total disregard and blind obstinancy and refusal to listen to that majority’s own beliefs.

So long as people are courteous (or if they fail, and I fail myself sometimes) are sincerely apologetic and wish to try again, I will always listen. But please take the time to explore WHY I believe as I do instead of telling me I am wrong, not listening to my references and my sources and my words, not bothering to do anything other than churn out increasingly angry variations on “You are wrong, not because I can point out any fault with what you say, but because I came here convinced you were wrong, will not even consider that you could be right and could be wrong, will not even correct myself when I am proven to be wrong in one thing but will ignore it and attack something else in my pre-programmed Boettner list”–well, when you can stop using the telemarketer ‘spiel’ and cast aside all your biases and judgment from the start and honestly, sincerely, and prayerfully approach a Catholic or a forum like this with the idea of “What if?” “What if everything I’ve been told about Catholics is mistaken?” “What if I looked at some of these books?” “What if I considered that this passage of Scripture really says what Catholics say it does?”–then maybe you might start to treat us Catholics as people instead of whatever label your ‘church’ gives us, and to start questioning your OWN ‘gospel truth’ instead of constantly demanding that WE question OURS.

The fullness of faith does not have to content itself with ‘parts’. But those with only ‘part’ should be striving to find ‘the whole’–shouldn’t they?
 
I went to Mount Alvernia for grammer school. Catholic Memerial, for high school. Notre Dame for college. As far as the pope goes, lets look at the history of the popes. lets start with Pope John 8Th. Was a woman, interesting? They found out when she was having a baby. Or the other popes that sold out the church for money. The married popes? What about the Pope Pius XII?

They are human just like us. Some good some bad. i would say in the last 150 years, Only one pope, that had the mind and heart of jesus. John Paul 2.

That is my take.
Then you better go back to those institutions and ask for your money back, your history education is pitiful, to say the least.

Pope ‘Joan’ is a myth. It has no more reality than Paul Bunyan.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Joan
 
i have done quite a bit of study, of our church. did you know that most of our rictuals come from babalon? Why is it we celibrate jesus birth on dec 25th?. if you read ther gosples closely, you would find he was born in the fall, around the feast of the tabernacles. one of many errors our chuch teaches. As as far as replying, i can see you are a catholic that leaves your brain at the churches door. i do not, i want to find the truth.
 
i have done quite a bit of study, of our church. did you know that most of our rictuals come from babalon? Why is it we celibrate jesus birth on dec 25th?. if you read ther gosples closely, you would find he was born in the fall, around the feast of the tabernacles. one of many errors our chuch teaches. As as far as replying, i can see you are a catholic that leaves your brain at the churches door. i do not, i want to find the truth.
I’m with Brendan. Get your money back.
 
So true. Peter was married. The pope is just as human as we are, only one perfect person that ever lived. jesus, that is why i have problems with my church. the biggest question i have regarding our church is if we are the whore in revelation. it seems to be a very good chance.
There is no proof that St. John was referring to The Church when he wrote of The Whore of Babylon. Since Revelations is Apocalyptic literature(along the lines of Daniel), it is loaded with symbolism. Given the events that were occuring at that time, more than likely St. John was referring to Rome.
 
So true. Peter was married. The pope is just as human as we are, only one perfect person that ever lived. jesus, that is why i have problems with my church. the biggest question i have regarding our church is if we are the whore in revelation. it seems to be a very good chance.
Yes, the current pope is like you and me, only he entered Seminary at age 12 (68 years ago), and has taught college and ran the office of the Doctrine of the Faith. There were many other Popes like this, as well as scoundrels. Again, you need to cite bad doctrine. 2000 years of good doctrine would show the Popes to be correct. If you think there is a contradiction, and some people see many, you have a responsibility to ask, even if you, in the end, need an infallible translator to understand…
 
i have done quite a bit of study, of our church. did you know that most of our rictuals come from babalon?
Yea, right, obviously from the same erronous source that you got the Pope “Joan” thing from :rolleyes:
**Why is it we celibrate jesus birth on dec 25th?. **if you read ther gosples closely, you would find he was born in the fall, around the feast of the tabernacles. one of many errors our chuch teaches.
The Church recognizes that we don’t know the specific date. Dec 25 is celebrated because that was the effective Solstice under the Julian calendar at the time the Feast of the Nativity was promulgated. It symbolizes Christ bringing Light to the World.

By the same token, the Feast of the Nativity of St. John the Baptist is celebrated on June 21, in rememberence of his statement " As He increases, so must I decrease"
As as far as replying, i can see you are a catholic that leaves your brain at the churches door
.

You didn’t seem to bring yours to history class :cool:

(And you seemed to have missed grammar class as well. “I” is capitalized when used as a personal pronoun).
i do not, i want to find the truth.
Good, then read some real history on the subject.
 
There is no proof that St. John was referring to The Church when he wrote of The Whore of Babylon. Since Revelations is Apocalyptic literature(along the lines of Daniel), it is loaded with symbolism. Given the events that were occuring at that time, more than likely St. John was referring to Rome.
To clarify, he was referring to Pagan Rome, as led by Caesar Nero.

Not to the headquarters of the Catholic Church.
 
Please, Laz. Anyone can come to these forums and CLAIM to be a ‘good Catholic with 16 years education’.

The proof is in the pudding.

Quickly now: Name the 7 spiritual and the 7 corporal works of mercy.
The fruits of the Holy Spirit.
What is the consecration?
When was the rosary introduced?
What is the significance of Sept 29?
How did St. Patrick explain the Trinity?
What was your confirmation project?
Give me your act of contrition.
What was Vatican I?
What is the significance of 1854?
What is an archbishop?
 
i feel bad for you. just brain washed. jesus would want us to find the truth, not follow what we are told. You are more concerned with the law, you sound like james. read paul more closely. works are dead. faith and trust is what jesus is looking for. not following every little law.
 
i have done quite a bit of study, of our church. did you know that most of our rictuals come from babalon? Why is it we celibrate jesus birth on dec 25th?. if you read ther gosples closely, you would find he was born in the fall, around the feast of the tabernacles. one of many errors our chuch teaches. As as far as replying, i can see you are a catholic that leaves your brain at the churches door. i do not, i want to find the truth.
No- didnt know that most of our rituals came from babylon-could you show me where I can find this? Also the Church does not assert that Jesus was born on December 25-that is merely he date it has been traditionally celebrated on.

In your book does actually beleiving what the Church teaches equate with “leaving the brain at the Chruch door”
 
i have done quite a bit of study, of our church. did you know that most of our rictuals come from babalon? Why is it we celibrate jesus birth on dec 25th?. if you read ther gosples closely, you would find he was born in the fall, around the feast of the tabernacles. one of many errors our chuch teaches. As as far as replying, i can see you are a catholic that leaves your brain at the churches door. i do not, i want to find the truth.
But, what were you studying?
 
i feel bad for you. just brain washed. jesus would want us to find the truth, not follow what we are told. You are more concerned with the law, you sound like james. read paul more closely. works are dead. faith and trust is what jesus is looking for. not following every little law.
Between this and the Whore reference, there is no way you’re going to convince me that your are a Catholic, or even went to those schools you claim you attended. . You sound more like someone who’s bought into that Jack Chick nonsense.:rolleyes:
 
i feel bad for you. just brain washed. jesus would want us to find the truth, not follow what we are told. You are more concerned with the law, you sound like james. read paul more closely. works are dead. faith and trust is what jesus is looking for. not following every little law.
I am curious-on you 16 years of Catholic Education did you have a course on Sock Puppets? Did you study the Creatures that were turned to stone in Tolkiens “Hobbit”.
 
You poor kid (and that is what I believe you are). May God help you; you don’t realize that you are the one being brainwashed into thinking that ‘rebellion’ is freedom by listening to the words of mere men, who have absolutely no guarantee of the Holy Spirit, and all of whose teachings can be shown, time and again, to be the SAME OLD HERESIES the Church has triumphed over since the time of Christ. You are so quick to look, not for ‘love’ and for “God”, but for hate, dissention, judgment, criticism, name-calling, and exalting yourself to the skies for being 'too smart to fall for something old when all this anger and ‘secret knowledge’ and ‘we have the new truth’ seems so much better.

Itching ears, indeed.
 
first of all. I do not believe in praying the rosary. i can pray to jesus directly. second, when mary stuck her nose in jesus ministry, he told her he was here to do his fathers works, not here for her.

Tantum ergo: you are funny.

Let me ask you a few questions?

Who put together the first writings that make up our bible?

what are the 3 oldest Codex’s?

Why is acts chapter 29 left out of our bible? The alexandrian has it included. you are talking to no dummie.
 
first of all. I do not believe in praying the rosary. i can pray to jesus directly. second, when mary stuck her nose in jesus ministry, he told her he was here to do his fathers works, not here for her.
You sound exactly like a 16 year old Fundamental Baptist, here.
Who put together the first writings that make up our bible?
St. Athanasius, in 367 AD.

I have never heard of your other two claims before; I’ll leave them for more experienced apologists to deal with.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top