The reason it may seem that the only people who talk about it are of the opinion that it hasn’t been done may be because those that oppose the Church’s position on this are vocal, but they really are a very, very small minority. All those who are both in authority and in the best position to know have repeatedly said the consecration has been done.In my experience, the only people who ever talk about or mention Fatima are of the opinion that the consecration hasn’t been done, so the impression I formed was that this was the general view.
With so many things this minority isn’t so happy about, I’m not surprised they’re unstatisfied with what the Church already did.The reason it may seem that the only people who talk about it are of the opinion that it hasn’t been done may be because those that oppose the Church’s position on this are vocal, but they really are a very, very small minority. All those who are both in authority and in the best position to know have repeatedly said the consecration has been done.
Thank you Vames for these. I enjoyed seeing them very much. Especiallly the one of her seemingly in the ceiling.
Sorry to add on/clarify hereThank you Vames for these. I enjoyed seeing them very much. Especiallly the one of her seemingly in the ceiling.
In reflecting on this devotion to the Theotokos that the Russian Orthodox have it would seem like they have already consecrated themselves to her. So to answer my own question in as far as I can with what knowledge I have it would seem that they were in union with the Pope already when he consecrated Russia to her.
P.S. on a side note to my last post about the errors of Russia, I believe the Catholic Church sees it as there were errors on bothe sides that cause the split between the Eastern and Western Churches. From what I remember of the book of my fathers this was what it was trying to explain also. Not sure if that helps clarify anything but I hope and pray it does.
Indeed, there are a lot of miraculous icons of the Theotokos with a long tradition of protecting Russian cities and provinces from wars, diseases, famine, natural catastrophes. Here’s Our Lady of Vladimir, the Lady who saves Russia. Another is Our Lady of Kazan (note the connection with JPII and Fatima). And Our Lady of Theodore is the patron icon of the Romanov dynasty, who ruled Russia until 1917.Thank you Vames for these. I enjoyed seeing them very much. Especiallly the one of her seemingly in the ceiling.
In reflecting on this devotion to the Theotokos that the Russian Orthodox have it would seem like they have already consecrated themselves to her. So to answer my own question in as far as I can with what knowledge I have it would seem that they were in union with the Pope already when he consecrated Russia to her.
en.radiovaticana.va/news/2013/04/15/pope:_calumny_destroys_the_work_of_god_in_people/en1-682926This age of “such great spiritual turmoil” reminded the Pope of an ancient Russian icon that depicts Our Lady covering the people of God with her mantle: “We pray to Our Lady to protect us, and in times of spiritual turbulence the safest place is under the mantle of Our Lady. She is the mother who takes care of the Church. And in this time of martyrs, she is the protagonist, the protagonist of protection: She is the Mother. (…) Let us state with faith: Mother, the Church is under your protection: Care for the Church.”
It is my understanding that just because of the fact that they are not in full communion with the Catholic Church then they do not fully accept the Guidance or Leadership of the Catholic Church in some capacity. The Pope being the head of the Catholic Church’s Guidance and Leadership tells me they do not fully accept him and his guidance and leadership.Just to add a question to keep the discussion going concerning the errors of Russia that Our Lady of Fatima warned of, does the Russian Orthodox Church deny the primacy of the successor of Peter among the bishops of the world?
Yes, from what I understand it would be. The way I see it is the Church is the Mystical Body of Christ. The Pope is the voice of Christ. To break away from him would be breaking or severing ourselves from Christ. It is to our own detriment and peril and loss that the more we are not united with the Pope’s Guidance and Leadership regarding issues of Faith and Morals. to include Dogmas, the more we tear apart the Mystical Body of Christ. The one thing that I see really tearing the Mystical Body of Christ apart is that because it is my understanding that it is the Pope in union with the Bishops is how the Holy Spirit guides us into the fullness of Truth. The more Bishops not in union with the Pope the harder it is for the Holy Spirit to guide us. I am reminded of what I heard Archbishop Cyril say. The Bishop’s are the walls of the New Jerusalem. They are the voice of Christ. If we are with them then we are with Christ. If we are against them we are against Christ. When I reflect on his words I can not help but wonder how strong those walls will be or how loud the voice of Christ will be when the Bishops of Christ’s Mystical Body are fully united.Would it be dangerous as a Catholic to break union with the pope? What would be the consequences?
That was beautiful. I hope that what you wrote here can be shared with other people.I can only share with you how I understand it so far…
It is my understanding that just because of the fact that they are not in full communion with the Catholic Church then they do not fully accept the Guidance or Leadership of the Catholic Church in some capacity. The Pope being the head of the Catholic Church’s Guidance and Leadership tells me they do not fully accept him and his guidance and leadership.
Yes, from what I understand it would be. The way I see it is the Church is the Mystical Body of Christ. The Pope is the voice of Christ. To break away from him would be breaking or severing ourselves from Christ. It is to our own detriment and peril and loss that the more we are not united with the Pope’s Guidance and Leadership regarding issues of Faith and Morals. to include Dogmas, the more we tear apart the Mystical Body of Christ. The one thing that I see really tearing the Mystical Body of Christ apart is that because it is my understanding that it is the Pope in union with the Bishops is how the Holy Spirit guides us into the fullness of Truth. The more Bishops not in union with the Pope the harder it is for the Holy Spirit to guide us. I am reminded of what I heard Archbishop Cyril say. The Bishop’s are the walls of the New Jerusalem. They are the voice of Christ. If we are with them then we are with Christ. If we are against them we are against Christ. When I reflect on his words I can not help but wonder how strong those walls will be or how loud the voice of Christ will be when the Bishops of Christ’s Mystical Body are fully united.
.
I hope and pray this makes sense. Please understand this is just how I see and understand things right now and if I do not understand things correctly I hope and pray some one can offer more insight, clarity and guidance to this. I myself would like to understand it better.