B
Basilios
Guest
I hope he consecrates Russia in the manner pleasing to Our Lady
So I hope, so may it be!
The term used by the Orthodox Church for those Eastern Churches in union with Rome is “uniate”. As it is considered a derogatory term, it is not used within the Catholic Church any longer when referring to them.The Russian Orthodox have already come out with statements hoping that Pope Francis will not support Eastern Catholics, particularly Ukrainian. I suspect he will openly support Eastern Catholics, which will not make the RO happy at all. In addition, they were on record prior to the conclave in hoping for a traditionalist to be elected Pontiff.
I strongly doubt that we will see any major improvements in Catholic-Russian Orthodox relations. Though for the record, I hope I am wrong and you are right.
for the consecration to be valid, it is said that the Bishops of the world must participate with the Holy Father in making a public profession regarding Russia. This has not yet occured, though various Popes have discussed the matter in an individual sense.
Let’s review an important fact here. When some affirm that the consecration was not done in the manner requested by Our Lady, we are not speaking of the words of Our Lady of Fatima, but of the words that Our Lady spoke in a subsequent private revelation to Sr. Lucia years later, specifically on June 13, 1929.I had always heard that Sister Lucia wrote a letter in which she said the consecration had been completed properly. Am I incorrect?
You please me very much by praying for the conversion of those countries. Ask this grace also of My Mother.
"Sweet Heart of Mary, be the salvation of Russia, Spain, Portugal, Europe and the whole world.
Ever since, quite a few consecrations had been done, but none - Sr. Lucia says - in the manner requested by Our Lady. Then on March 25, 1984 Pope John Paul II renewed the Consecration once more in St. Peter’s. In preparation to that event, Pope John Paul II wrote a letter to all bishops, clarifying that this consecration of 1984 was to renew both the consecration of the world and Russia. When he spoke, before repeating the act of consecration with the wording of 1982, he stated:“By Thy pure and Immaculate Conception, O Mary, obtain for me the conversion of Russia, Spain, Portugal, Europe and the whole world.”
Some have said that the wording of 1982 is not specifically mentioning Russia. This however is not keeping into consideration the fact that the Lord was pleased to include several other countries in the request to Our Lady. Thus, John Paul II, within the consecration of the whole world, added the following very clear statement:I will today entrust to her Immaculate Heart — in spiritual union with all the bishops of the world — all individuals and peoples
Christ knows (and so does Our Lady) which individuals and nations particularly need to be consecrated. It is a mere coincidence that when Sr. Lucia spoke of Spain and Portugal and Europe, Our Lord said that this was pleasing to Him. As far as we know, it is fairly possible that other nations by 1984 needed a special consecration.In a special way we entrust and consecrate to you those individuals and nations which particularly need to be entrusted and consecrated.
It is written that wisdom is justified by its works. The consecration took place on March 1984. Around that very same time, the constituent republics of the Soviet Union started legal moves towards potentially declaring sovereignty over their territories. On November 9, 1989 the Berlin Wall falls. On April 13 1991 the Catholic Church established in Moscow the Apostolic Administration of European Russia (later to become the first Metropolitan Archdiocese of Moscow). Finally, on Christmas, December 25, 1991, Gorbachev resigned as president of the Soviet Union, declaring the office extinct and dissolving the USSR.this same Supreme Pontiff, John Paul II wrote to all the bishops of the world asking them to unite with him. He sent for the statute of Our Lady of Fatima – the one from the little Chapel to be taken to Rome and on March 25, 1984 - publicly - with the bishops who wanted to unite with His Holiness, made the Consecration as Our Lady requested. They then asked me if it was made as Our Lady requested, and I said, “YES.” Now it was made.
+1It is wonderful news to hear of nostrum Papa consecrating his pontificate to Our Lady of Fatima. I pray that Our Lady grant him much grace during his years in the papacy, interceding for him, the cardinals, bishops, priests, nuns, and all religious.![]()
That’s right. Besides, Russia has its own big Marian feast, The Protecting Veil of the Theotokos, based on an apparition recognized by the Orthodox Church. If the Theotokos had asked the Russians to consecrate the West to her Protecting Veil, so as to prevent the Western nations “to spread their errors throughout the world”, and if the Russian Orthodox Church had decided to follow her request, I doubt any Western nation would be delighted.The term used by the Orthodox Church for those Eastern Churches in union with Rome is “uniate”. As it is considered a derogatory term, it is not used within the Catholic Church any longer when referring to them.
I believe the “errors” referred to are communism, atheism etc, not the Orthodox Church.That’s right. Besides, Russia has its own big Marian feast, The Protecting Veil of the Theotokos, based on an apparition recognized by the Orthodox Church. If the Theotokos had asked the Russians to consecrate the West to her Protecting Veil, so as to prevent the Western nations “to spread their errors throughout the world”, and if the Russian Orthodox Church had decided to follow her request, I doubt any Western nation would be delighted.
Yep. That’s why I avoided use of the term.The term used by the Orthodox Church for those Eastern Churches in union with Rome is “uniate”. As it is considered a derogatory term, it is not used within the Catholic Church any longer when referring to them.
Of course it wasn’t about the Orthodox Church.I believe the “errors” referred to are communism, atheism etc, not the Orthodox Church.
Nevermind, it sounded to me like you meant that the Orthodox Church was being included in the “errors” mentioned at Fatima and thus they wouldn’t like being consecrated. I see what you mean nowOf course it wasn’t about the Orthodox Church.
But the “errors” of the communist - atheist regime are history now; Vladimir Putin governs the country together with the Orthodox Church.
Hi Vames, I was wondering if I could bother you and if you would be so kind, with supplying a picture or icon of this image of the Theotokos. Please and thank youThat’s right. Besides, Russia has its own big Marian feast, The Protecting Veil of the Theotokos, based on an apparition recognized by the Orthodox Church. If the Theotokos had asked the Russians to consecrate the West to her Protecting Veil, so as to prevent the Western nations “to spread their errors throughout the world”, and if the Russian Orthodox Church had decided to follow her request, I doubt any Western nation would be delighted.
I understand that this message has been interpreted to mean “Russia” as in the Socialist government that would spread it’s errors. But after following many threads and reflecting and praying a lot about it I am lead to believe that this message of Our Blessed Mother Mary at Fatima may have an even deeper meaning especially for us Catholics.Of course it wasn’t about the Orthodox Church.
But the “errors” of the communist - atheist regime are history now; Vladimir Putin governs the country together with the Orthodox Church.
The timing of the apparitions is even more amazing when you consider that the Russian Revolution which brought Communism to power started in March 1917 and the apparitions started just after in May 1917, and the Russian Revolution culminated in October 1917 while the apparitions stopped in October 1917.One of the things that struck me was the timing of the apparitions. They took place in 1917.
Vatican I: 1869-1870
Vatican II : 1962-1965
I thought it was almost uncanny that the apparitions at Fatima took place almost right in the middle of these two Councils.
Kind of makes you wonder what else was being addressed through the apparitions that we are clueless about but others have the wisdom and knowledge to see and understand.The timing of the apparitions is even more amazing when you consider that the Russian Revolution which brought Communism to power started in March 1917 and the apparitions started just after in May 1917, and the Russian Revolution culminated in October 1917 while the apparitions stopped in October 1917.
When I first realized that my jaw dropped.
The Consecration happened already…(As Sr. Lucia has affirmed).These are encouraging signs that Pope Francis may be the one to fulfil Our Lady of Fatimas requests regarding the consecration of Russia.
If Russia was consecrated in a manner pleasing to Our Lady in the exact way that she asked why:The Consecration happened already…(As Sr. Lucia has affirmed).
catholic.com/quickquestions/why-hasnt-the-pope-consecrated-russia-to-the-immaculate-heart
The information there is coming from misinformation.Russia has not been consecrated. Sister Lucy on other occasions after 1984’s consecration of the world (i.e. not specifically Russia) that in fact the consecration had not fulfilled Our Lady’s command.