J
JKirkLVNV
Guest
I haven’t read them all. I lost interest and couldn’t get through the fifth one. Rowlings writes well enough, but she’s no Tolkien and he pretty much ruined all other fantasy for me.Catholic Exchange
- Harry Potter is a global long-term project to change the culture. In this generation of youths, inhibitions against magic and the occult are being destroyed. Thus, forces re-enter society which Christianity had overcome. **This sounds like a conspiracy theory. **
- Hogwarts, the school of magic and witchcraft, is a closed world of violence and horror, of cursing and bewitching, of racist ideology, of blood sacrifice, disgust, and obsession. There is an atmosphere of continuous threat, which the young reader cannot escape. This may go some way toward describing what happens at Hogwarts in part, but it certainly doesn’t paint an accurate picture of Rowling’s world. Also, the kid could close the book.
- While Harry Potter appears in the beginning to fight against evil, in fact the similarities between him and Voldemort, the arch-evil adversary in the tale, become more and more obvious. In volume five, Harry is being obsessed by Voldemort, which leads to symptoms of personality disintegration. So we’ll see if Harry conquers.
- The human world becomes degraded; the world of witches and sorcerers becomes glorified. Muggles don’t come off very well, do they?
- There is no positive transcendent dimension. The supernatural is entirely demonic. Divine symbols are perverted. Not at all true. Goodness prevails.
- Harry Potter is no modern fairy tale. In fairy tales, sorcerers and witches are unambiguous figures of evil and the hero escapes their power through the exercise of virtue. In the Harry Potter universe there is no character that endeavors consistently to achieve good. For seemingly good ends evil means are being used. Not at all true. There are plenty of characters that come down on the side of light and goodness. Also, I’m guessing she hasn’t much use for Gandalf the Wizard in Tokien’s Lord of the Rings (and he was a devout Catholic).
- A (young!) reader’s power of discernment of good and evil is blocked out through emotional manipulation and intellectual confusion. I’ve not met a single child of whom this is true, either in the school where I teach, or among my Catholic nieces and nephews, who are mad about the books.
- It is an assault upon this generation of youth, seducing it playfully into a world of witchcraft and sorcery, filling the imagination of the young with images of a world in which evil reigns, from which there is no escape, on the contrary, it is portrayed as highly desirable. This would mean that they cannot understand the difference between fiction and non-fiction. Not usually an issue after third grade.
- Those who value plurality of opinion should resist the nearly overwhelming power of this peer pressure, which is being accomplished through a gigantic corporate and multimedia blitz — one which displays elements of totalitarian brainwashing.
Again, shades of a conspiracy theory. I suppose it could be true, but I’m always suspicious of them. For one thing, a conspiracy usually involves more than one person, which basically means you have a committee, and we all know how well those work out.- Since through the Potter books faith in a loving God is systematically undermined, even destroyed in many young people, through false “values” and mockery of Judeo-Christian truth, the introduction of these books in schools is intolerant. Parents should refuse permission for their children to take part in Potter indoctrination for reasons of faith and conscience.
It’s true that thus far the Triune God hasn’t shown up, but He doesn’t show up in LOTR or The Chronicles of Narnia, either, at least not overtly. But there are lots of hints at transcendent goodness in all of the books, because they have heroes and heroes, by definition, transcend. I doubt very seriously that faith in God is undermined, and I fail to see either a mockery of Judeo-Christian truth. The author sounds to me like my granny (whom I love very much, may she rest in everlasting peach and may the Light of Heaven shine upon her), who believed that all the blame for the ills of modern society could be laid squarely at the feet of the Beatles.
Cardinal Ratzinger’s response seems pretty pro forma to me. It’s not a denunciation from the Chair of Peter, as someone else has said.