Pope's Latin mass plans spark concern

  • Thread starter Thread starter bones_IV
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
For starters, try St. Stanislaus Kostka, Brooklyn, NY; Sts Simon & Jude, Brooklyn, NY; St. Anne’s, North Little Rock, AR, the Cathedral of St. Andrew, Little Rock, AR, Our Lady of Grace, Brooklyn, NY.
Add to that Our Lady of Peace in Santa Clara, CA. I attended there before moving. They also have perpetual adoration and every hour begins with a public praying of the rosary…(perpetual…that’s 24 hours a day 😉 ).

At my new parish, St. Thomas Aquinas, we pray a decade of the rosary in the church as a community before our faith formation classes in the evening - that’s 1-1/2 hours of faith formation from pre-schooler to adult, all at the same time (in different locations of course). It’s great! What a way to spend a Sunday at Church as a family.

There is real renewal going on in parishes across the country. Yes, we’ve had abuses of Vatican II, but as a community we are pulling things back to the true spirit.

God bless,

Robert
 
Any priest can call on his parishioners to dress more formally at Mass. I’ve noticed that dress varies by parish, and it seems to be the black parishes where the folks attend Mass better dressed. I personally always wear a jacket and tie, though not usually a suit, to Mass. My wife always wears a hat to Mass as she has done for decades. She thinks those hankies on the head that the schismatic women wear are ridiculous. Surely they can afford a decent hat that does justice to their clothing and shows respect at the same time. Just our opinions.
I like my “hankies”, chapel caps, mantillas, scarves or what ever you decide to name them. Mine come in black, white, brown and a real nice gold one for special occasions. I don’t go to Mass to be seen but to worship.

Hats can sometimes obscure other people’s view of what they want to see. My “hankie” never blocks someones view.
 
Excerpted: (This article originally appeared in the July 2005 issue of Catholic World Report.)**
**
The universal Church has enjoyed spectacular growth in the number of seminarians since 1978. When John Paul II became Pope, there were 63,882 diocesan and religious seminarians studying philosophy and theology. Twenty-four consecutive years of growth brought the number to 112,643. The number fell back slightly to 112,373 in 2003, the last year for which full statistics are available. But that figure is still a 76 percent increase over the number for 1978.

In the midst of this worldwide vocation boom, however, the Church in the United States has suffered a vocation collapse. According to the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate, the total number of American diocesan and religious seminarians in college and theology seminary programs decreased from 9,021 in 1978 to 4,790 in 2003–a decline of nearly 47 percent. This has led to an increasing number of U.S. parishes being headed by foreign priests.
Rich,

I don’t think a press release from the totally unbiased CWR helps.

How many seminarians are currently in your diocesan seminary?

In my diocese:
517,679 Catholics
151 parishes
2 ordinations last year
3 parishes are in the hands of permanent deacons
4 parishes are in the care of professed women religious
3 parishes are in the care of laity
28 seminarians

The American Seminary for the SSPX has 30 young men in their first year alone. They have no room to accept more.

The seminary for the FSSP is begging for funds for their seminary because they cant house all of the applicants.
 
Add to that Our Lady of Peace in Santa Clara, CA. I attended there before moving. They also have perpetual adoration and every hour begins with a public praying of the rosary…(perpetual…that’s 24 hours a day 😉 ).

At my new parish, St. Thomas Aquinas, we pray a decade of the rosary in the church as a community before our faith formation classes in the evening - that’s 1-1/2 hours of faith formation from pre-schooler to adult, all at the same time (in different locations of course). It’s great! What a way to spend a Sunday at Church as a family.

There is real renewal going on in parishes across the country. Yes, we’ve had abuses of Vatican II, but as a community we are pulling things back to the true spirit.

God bless,

Robert
We pray the rosary afterwards at Our Lady of Las Vegas, as well as the Divine Mercy Chaplet. Of course, modernists that we are, we include the Mysteries of Light.:rolleyes:
 
Rich,

I don’t think a press release from the totally unbiased CWR helps.

How many seminarians are currently in your diocesan seminary?

In my diocese:
517,679 Catholics
151 parishes
2 ordinations last year
3 parishes are in the hands of permanent deacons
4 parishes are in the care of professed women religious
3 parishes are in the care of laity
28 seminarians

The American Seminary for the SSPX has 30 young men in their first year alone. They have no room to accept more.

The seminary for the FSSP is begging for funds for their seminary because they cant house all of the applicants.
But that cover’s the whole country. Proportionately, that’s nothing!
 
We pray the rosary afterwards at Our Lady of Las Vegas, as well as the Divine Mercy Chaplet. Of course, modernists that we are, we include the Mysteries of Light.:rolleyes:
As long as you don’t say “your eyes of mercy” instead of “thine eyes of mercy”…that would be heretical! :rolleyes: 😃
 
Let’s get that altar back like it should be so the priest has his back to the worshippers, put the communion rail back where it belongs, say the Mass in Latin and ring the sanctus bell to wake up the sleepers so they will pay attention, like we used to do when I was a boy; also, this thing of having real estate salespersons, dental assistants. day care providers, mail carriers, and grocery store check-out clerks, and other laity acting as eucharistic ministers has to go. Only ordained clergy should be allowed to do this. And, let’s get those confessionals back. I want to see Catholics lined up for confession on Saturday nights - not these group “reconciliations.”
Wow - I thought I was the only one who felt this way.
We have let the libs take over our church and thats how we got the Priest scandal.

We want our church back!
 
The problem I have is the claims that the Latin Mass will encourage disrespect for Protestants, Jews, etc. That is about the same thing, in my opinion, that the Passion of the Christ will spark anti-Semitism, which did not occur. Same level of thinking, IMO.
 
Wow - I thought I was the only one who felt this way.
We have let the libs take over our church and thats how we got the Priest scandal.

We want our church back!
Funny, quite a few priests that have been guilty of paedophilia (you refered to the scandal) and other sexual misconduct were formed by the pre-VII seminaries, bishops, etc. And as someone who is not a liberal, I can say I’ve never heard a liberal Catholic advocate for the molestation of children. I’ve heard them utter lots of other rubbish, but not that.
 
The problem I have is the claims that the Latin Mass will encourage disrespect for Protestants, Jews, etc. That is about the same thing, in my opinion, that the Passion of the Christ will spark anti-Semitism, which did not occur. Same level of thinking, IMO.
I would have to concur. If that’s the allegation, it’s on the silly side.
 
Funny, quite a few priests that have been guilty of paedophilia (you refered to the scandal) and other sexual misconduct were formed by the pre-VII seminaries, bishops, etc. And as someone who is not a liberal, I can say I’ve never heard a liberal Catholic advocate for the molestation of children. I’ve heard them utter lots of other rubbish, but not that.
Small point. The overwhelming majority of priests involved in the sex scandals were guilty of ephebophilia vice paedophilia. Though still completely wrong, there is a difference.****
 
Small point. The overwhelming majority of priests involved in the sex scandals were guilty of ephebophilia vice paedophilia. Though still completely wrong, there is a difference.
“Ephebophilia.” What does that mean? And thank you for the clarification.
 
“Ephebophilia.” What does that mean? And thank you for the clarification.
It’s the the sexual attraction of an older person to a newly pubescent person of the same sex .

Paedophilia involves young children.
 
It’s the the sexual attraction of an older person to a newly pubescent person of the same sex .

Paedophilia involves young children.
I didn’t realize they’d broken it down. Thanks again!
 
I didn’t realize they’d broken it down. Thanks again!
Yes a bit horrible that such distinctions would have to be made but it does paint a bit of a different picture on the scandal. Doesn’t make it any less repulsive but the “how’s” and “why’s” are perhaps different than most may believe.

This article presents some interesting insight.

Sorry for the hijack.
 
Rich,

I don’t think a press release from the totally unbiased CWR helps.
Why not? These are number, not opinions.
The American Seminary for the SSPX has 30 young men in their first year alone. They have no room to accept more.

The seminary for the FSSP is begging for funds for their seminary because they cant house all of the applicants.
The numbers of applicants to both seminaries in the U.S. are drops in the bucket in proportion to the number of seminarians worldwide and to the number of Catholics worldwide.
 
I like my “hankies”, chapel caps, mantillas, scarves or what ever you decide to name them.
Fine.
My “hankie” never blocks someones view.
If you have such a fine collection of headcoverings, Kathleen, why would you ever rely on a hankie?

In my Polish parish in Brooklyn, the young women tended to wear hats, the older ladies babushkas. 🙂
 
I find it interesting that liberals will do anything under the sun to accomodate Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and Protestants–ooo but make a policy decision to accomodate the SSPX–it’s outrage to them. Ugh.
The topic here is the use of the Tridentine Mass and the Novus Ordo Mass. You bring up liberal accomodation of others, but not accomodation of the Schismatics.

Where are the liberals trying to accommodate Muslim, Buddhist, or Hindu forms of the Mass? I don’t see it, even in “liberal” parishes.
 
We have let the libs take over our church and thats how we got the Priest scandal.
JPII took over the Church and as a consequence we got the priest scandal? I see no connection. Not even the most liberal bishops applauded the incidents of molestation.
 
The topic here is the use of the Tridentine Mass and the Novus Ordo Mass. You bring up liberal accomodation of others, but not accomodation of the Schismatics.

Where are the liberals trying to accommodate Muslim, Buddhist, or Hindu forms of the Mass? I don’t see it, even in “liberal” parishes.
Your first point, if I understand it was that “liberal” accomodation to non-christian groups is not consistant with their non-accomidation of Schimatics is not a valid point for this thread. I strongly disgree. It is central to understanding the issues that divide the church today.

Your second point was basically “show me the money”. That is demonstrate where liberals embrace moslems and other non-christian groups yet desire traditionalists to fall offf the facre of the Earth. (Please, I said this with intentional hyperbole to draw the contrast between the two attitudes.)

Case in point, SSPX. This group is often referred to as schismatic. Yet they are not technically schismatic. Some of the their leaders are in schism, but the priests in the society have an irregular relationship to Rome. Yet, many continue call SSPX “schismatic”. Their voices are so loud that it successfully keeps Bishop Fellay and other leaders from engaging in serious discussions about regularizing their relationship. Those who yell “schism” the loudest seem to be the ones who want the schism to be real. remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/archive-2005-1130-hoyos-30days.htm

As for groups that have engaged in an, look no further than the decline of the Jesuit and Franciscan orders. There was great controversy at the inclusion of Muslim, Zoastroists, and so on, clerics at Masses at the Catherdral at Assisi, Italy. The same Assisi as in St. Francis. This ocurred on January 24, 2002. sspx.org/discussions/rome_sspx_campos_continued.htm
(I do not agree with much of the editorializing in this story, but it does present some interting facts. Their spin, however, must be taken into account. You may not like what they say, but they did not invent it.)

(This is a subscripbtion link to a more “hard news” version of the same event.) cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=17273

Those in charge of administerring Fatima have been accused of similar abuses by conservatives, but I do not recall the details. and I do not have time to do a search.

I will say that liberals are not the only ones who are selective about whom they attack and who they embrace.

The problem is, if a person can’t pass the 2865 Test, they really cannot call themself Catholic, liberal, conservative, traditional or dissenter. Unfortunately, it is many of the “liberals” who are unable to pass this all-important test yet they deny the needs of those traditional groups who can pass this test blindfolded.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top