Preschoolers lying on top of drag queen

  • Thread starter Thread starter puppson
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I play with kids. Catch, usually, with a football.
Initiating intimate embraces, tickling, touching anywhere but upper back and arms (and that only very briefly and only when the child initiates the “hug”) are absolutely prohibited. Air hugs and very brief side hugs are the rule, and only when the child initiates.

Lying on the floor while they crawl on you? I guess that’s so obviously wrong they don’t need to spell it out.
 
Last edited:
I did just that.It seems it’s a push from the transgender community to be all inclusive regender identity.One que n was quoted as saying it’s a grooming process for the next generation.
So it is indoctrination and not just the light hearted comedic performance of yesteryear it seems🤨
 
Initiating embraces, tickling, etc.? Absolutely prohibited.
And it’s kind of sad, in my opinion, that these kinds of things are now considered to be off limits for adults because of the risk that it might be misconstrued as something sexual. But that’s the way our world is now because of all the cases of sexual abuse that have come to light. No one can risk it now even if it’s completely innocent because of the terrible things done by a few bad people.
 
Last edited:
I’m not going to be made out as judgmental for pointing out obvious child endangerment. I’m a mandated reporter and recertified yearly. This behaviour by this man violates all standards of acceptable child contact whether the standards are public or private (e.g.Catholic) and whatever those standards are titled.
 
Last edited:
Not even a relevant argument in regard to this behaviour.
Do you even understand what “inappropriate physical contact” means?
 
Last edited:
I’m not going to be made out as judgmental for pointing out obvious child endangerment. I’m a mandated reporter and recertified yearly.
So, are you going to report what happened in this library as child endangerment? There were a lot of other witnesses who could corroborate your account if it’s true.
 
Last edited:
It all happened in public with people all around and pictures were even taken of it. It seems rather harmless to me. It would be different if someone were to open the door to a classroom and find a teacher doing this alone with a student.
Wow, you are actually defending this. Were you also a big fan of child “drag queens” doing strip teases in gay bars for money? Are you a big supporter of drag queens taking naked pictures with children? All laughs amirite?

It’s inappropriate because drag queens are explicitly sexual. It is a sexualization of the body, exaggerating what are considered sexual female behaviors and clothing as a fetish, not for laughs. If it were not a sexualization the dude would call himself a cross dresser, not a drag queen.

A father playing with his kids is not equivalent to a man in lingerie playing with other people’s kids. Kids sitting on a woman’s lap reading stories is not the same as kids sitting on a stripper’s lap in glitter, heels, and bikini reading stories. A father laying in bed with his kids reading them bedtime stories is not the same as some random man laying in bed with someone else’s kid reading him stories. The fact that you cannot see or refuse to acknowledge these distinctions is disturbing.

What is the point of having kids sit and listen to a man wearing a low cut dress, heels, a wig, and makeup? How is that educational? It’s only educational if you want to normalize deviant sexual behavior to children. It doesn’t matter that other adults were present taking pictures. They are complicit in sexualizing the lie own children whether they realize it or not. Since you seem to be fond of what-ifs, would you be equally welcoming of this exact same scenario but with a stripper or a porn star in sexually suggestive clothing? Or do you just have a soft spot for drag queens?
 
Last edited:
Straw man. That would obviously be futile here, and you know it. But I am exposing this wickedness, as are others on social media.

The point is, I know what “inappropriate physical contact” means, I’ve been trained to recognize it. You obviously don’t know what it means. I suggest you educate yourself. There are free online resources.
 
Last edited:
What is the point of having kids sit and listen to a man wearing a low cut dress, heels, a wig, and makeup? How is that educational? It’s only educational if you want to normalize deviant sexual behavior to children. It doesn’t matter that other adults were present taking pictures. They are complicit in sexualizing the lie own children whether they realize it or not.
These drag queen story hours seem to be fairly popular and they’re happening in libraries all over the country. The people who run these libraries don’t seem to find anything objectionable about them, nor it seems do many patrons of these libraries. I’ve never been to one, but from what I’ve read and pictures I’ve seen, they seem pretty tame and not sexual.

But since I’m not an expert on drag queens or story hours or public libraries and this topic is only of passing interest to me and not something I’m at all passionate about, I think I’ll bow out.
 
Last edited:
Bow out if you like, but please be real about it. You can’t win here, defending obvious evil.
And–it has nothing to do with this man’s sexual orientation, which is unknown to me. It has to do with the type of physical contact, plain and simple. The guidelines, public or private, are near universal in my experience.That this library staff chooses to distort or ignore them is on their souls. They are collaborators.
 
Don’t send your kids to the public libraries or the public schools. Problem solved.
 
True. These events should also be banned in public places. Our taxes are supporting them. That, is flat out wrong.
 
All I want to understand is why a drag queen story hour in the first place.? What’s the objective here?
I suspect it’s to normalize transvestite behavior as acceptable with kiddies.
Just playing dress-up.
 
Our taxes support a myriad of things that are wrong. We need to stop electing people who have no concept of the proper role of government.
 
Of course it is. And what better target than young children? They don’t think like sexually mature people. They are innocent and defenseless. I find the whole thing monstrously predatory. They have no advocate. It’s unutterably sad.
 
That’s certainly true. These libraries, like the education lobbies and school boards, are preying on children with government backing.
 
Last edited:
As Christ said do not scandalize the little children ,this is diabolical indoctrination
 
One can only wonder what the next step will be, since so many see this as harmless fun? It will certainly embolden those behind it even more. “Look! Most people are fine with our transvestite violating the physical sanctity of children!”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top