You should vote for a candidate that can win. Even if Romney decreases abortions by “just” 1 (it will be vastly more than that, based on the Mexico City Policy alone), that should be enough to get your vote. Every life, every life, is precious.
What do you want a pinch on the harm or a limb hacked off…if you think both are the same…well…do I need to explain?
Even though I think he’s more likely to kill more innocents in the Middle East?
The comparison is like chopping off an arm or chopping off a leg. Which would you rather have done to you?What do you want a pinch on the harm or a limb hacked off…if you think both are the same…well…do I need to explain?
Oh please now you sound like Al Gore…let me tell you something…what makes you think you are gonna have the right to buy a handgun after Obama’s 2nd term…and let’s say you get a Class III license and buy an M60 machine gun…you still think you can take on the US?I’m getting a handgun for my 21st birthday.
So, Roll Tide if there’s a one party system. “I want to kill me some redcoats… or Communists… or w/e” :knight1:
.
Seriously… I highly doubt that the millions of Republican voters in this country are going to let that happen. The conservatives have way more guns in this country than liberals. The army is made up of far more conservatives than liberals. I think a one party system is less likely than America having a democratic system with more than 2 parties in government… which is a reality in the majority of democracies across the world.
It isn’t at all fishy logic. Chemotherapy is extremely unpleasant, but people do it because dying of cancer is worse. I don’t think you would call that logic fishy.
Why do you think he will? What, exactly, do you expect him to do, and what is your evidence for it?
But in that case one is clearly better than the other. I’m not convinced of that in this case.
Invade Iran. He has said many times that Obama (drone warfare king) is not aggressive enough towards the Middle East and that Iran cannot be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons.
Yeah, because Obama is a regular Mother Teresa in that respect.
Voting for people who can’t possibly win just because one agrees with them more is nothing but personal vanity.Well if you vote for Virgil Goode and Obama wins a second term you won’t have a 2-party system to kick around anymore, just a pro-Obama one-party system.
Oh please stop with the nonsense. Romney is nothing like Obama.
Romney is just as much of a socialist as Obama. Romney just pays lip service to free markets. I’m not going to vote on rhetoric.
He’s the king of drone warfare. However, when talking exclusively about invading Iran, I think both would do it, I just think that Romney would be more willing to do it based on his rhetoric.
It’s that kind of logic THAT ENSURES THAT PEOPLE CAN’T WIN. I’m so sick of the argument that voting for the person that you like is throwing away your vote. Voting for bad people is wrong.
In this regard, since we have so little influence anyway (less than 1/1000000 of the total vote), as long as we follow our well-formed conscience I think we should be fine.
Perhaps researching would help. Those things done in the previous administration to oppose abortion are exceedingly well documented in numerous threads on CAF. Those things done in this administration to promote abortion and homosexual “marriage” are equally well documented. Never did Romney actively persecute the Church. The worst he ever did was say the abortion mandate in the Mass. statute (the portion in which his veto was overridden by Democrats in the legislature) really was the law, which it was. Obama has said he would want his daughter to kill his own grandchild if she wanted to, and opposed providing medical care to infants born alive from botched abortions.
I’m not going to tell you when my birthday is, but it’s less than 6 months after Obama is re-elected. I live in Alabama. You’re saying I won’t be able to buy a handgun?Oh please now you sound like Al Gore…let me tell you something…what makes you think you are gonna have the right to buy a handgun after Obama’s 2nd term…and let’s say you get a Class III license and buy an M60 machine gun…you still think you can take on the US?
May I remind you to Ruby Ridge and Waco…they had guns and they thought they could take on the government like you.
Wake up dude!
Looking at this post… do you see how people like me could logically ask the question:
Close to wrong on everything, but not quite.
I’ll grant you that Romney probably is much better when it comes to abortion. However, I cannot just ignore that he is more likely to initiate an invasion which would kill more than one hundred thousand and displace more than one million (like what happened in Iraq).
Government is not a business. Is Massachusetts in good shape? How did the healthcare bill work out for them?
So then Romney opposed the healthcare bill in his state and tried to defeat it and talks about how it’s failing Massachusetts now, right?
That’s no difference. They both support the Fed. The Fed chairman is only one part of the whole institution.
The only difference is the party that started it, then. Sounds like he’s just in favor of whatever Republicans do.
washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/romney-in-2008-stimulus-not-spending-cuts-is-the-way-to-boost-the-economy/2012/08/15/0dae4c7a-e6e5-11e1-8f62-58260e3940a0_blog.html
Neither is cutting military spending. Obama is keeping it flat, Romney is going to raise it. Military spending is FAR, FAR too high in this country.
I’ve heard that line before. Believe me, I’m from California. If he has no specifics then nothing will get done. Did he do anything in Massachusetts?
1 issue that he’s better at, and war he’s probably worse at to compensate. Everything else is the same.
