F
Fran65
Guest
Why do you think this? Given the well documented success of many psychiatric drugs for most of those with mental illness, which suggests a biological basis, I’m not sure why you think ‘genuine’ mental illness is ‘rare’. Other disorders of the organs and tissues are not rare, for example, heart disease, asthma, eczma, headaches, back pain etc , so why would disorders of the nervous system be rare? God made us body and soul, we live in a fallen world, our bodies will fail. often mental illness looks willful or chosen, I’m thinking of Anorexia Nervosa, for example, but the reality is that there is no choice once the person loses touch with reality.I think the case of genuine, biological mental disorder is more rare than most make it out to be. .
I have a reluctance to use this type of formula. People with mental illness are us, and we all need help. Referring to them as ‘these people’ creates an impression of ‘other’ where actually, these people are just people, like everyone else.…These people need help …
I agree, except I would say that this is the case for some, not all people with these types of difficulties.I’m not saying the tendency to repress or to rescind is beneficial holistically. I am saying that it is beneficial from their point-of-view because there is some other thing that they think they most avoid.
Its clear that we do agree on some things and differ in our opinion on others. And that’s okay. Like you I’ve worked with people with mental health difficulties and have worked in psychiatric units too. People differ very, very, markedly and far more than diagnostic criteria suggest.
You might be interested in book called ‘The Myth of Neurosis’, which makes a similar argument to yours. R.D. Laing also has some similarities, as does Thomas Szasz.
God Bless
Karen