V
VanitasVanitatum
Guest
People who are asleep don’t have bodily autonomy either.
Last edited:
So based on your logic, it would be perfectly fine to murder those in a coma.Nope. The family make decisions on their behalf.
Sure they do.People who are asleep don’t have bodily autonomy.
If they don’t come of it, they eventually die. That’s the tough realityHume:
So based on your logic, it would be perfectly fine to murder those in a coma.Nope. The family make decisions on their behalf.
We all eventually die.If they don’t come of it, they eventually die.
Similarly, it’s often a function of money in both cases.
Not if you do it quickly enough. Or they could be drugged and they can’t do anything.Try to violate them bodily. They’ll wake up.
Sure, then you’d be charged with a crime for violating their bodily autonomy.Hume:
Not if you do it quickly enough. Or they could be drugged and they can’t do anything.Try to violate them bodily. They’ll wake up.
Nice duck.If they don’t come of it, they eventually die. That’s the tough reality
There is no reason to think they have bodily autonomy in those states unless you have evidence to the contrarySure, then you’d be charged with a crime for violating their bodily autonomy.
We? Who’s That?We just recognize that the rights of the woman completely eclipse the rights of the fetus.
No duck. That’s the truth.Hume:
Nice duck.If they don’t come of it, they eventually die. That’s the tough reality
The same rights as all human beings!What rights does a fetus have?
Except we have a problem - we have a fetus with a theoretical right to live and a mother with the theoretical right of bodily autonomy.The same rights as all human beings!
And it carefully avoids the question of if it is moral to murder those in a coma.No duck. That’s the truth.
Lets say their spouse wants to have sex with them. Would you consider it rape?Sure. Their spouse. Whoever would be their next legal kin.
No avoidance.Hume:
And it carefully avoids the question of if it is moral to murder those in a coma.No duck. That’s the truth.
Sex requires consent of both parties.Hume:
Lets say their spouse wants to have sex with them. Would you consider it rape?Sure. Their spouse. Whoever would be their next legal kin.
You said they don’t have bodily autonomy.As one partner will not have consented to the sex, sure. It’s rape.
Yeah. Since you can’t obtain consent, you can’t have sex with them. Similar to date-rape rules we have on college campuses.Hume:
They don’t have bodily autonomy though.As one partner will not have consented to the sex, sure. It’s rape.