Fine. Let’s suppose I agree with you on the interpretation of that scripture.
There is no interpretation to be made. The passage speaks for itself.
**John 20:22-23
**
And with that he breathed on them and said, “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive anyone his sins, they are forgiven; if you do not forgive them, they are not forgiven.”
Jesus
CERTAINLY gave the Apostles the Power of the Holy Spirit to forgive sins in His Name. Stands on it’s own.
Now, as we both know, there is much scripture that deals with forgiveness of sins and makes zero mention of confessing to a man.
Wrong. Jesus told His Apostles to go and forgive sins.
Why did Jesus give the Power of the Holy Spirit to His Apostles to forgive sins then? Was it just a joke?
Can you produce any scripture that states we must confess to a priest.
There doesn’t need to be. He told His Apostles to go forgive sins, by the Power of the Holy Spirit and in His Name.
Who made the decision that venial sins can be forgiven directly by God and who made the decision that a mediator, by way of an ordained Catholic priest is necessary to forgive mortal sins.
There is no mediator: It is God who forgives sins through that same Power of the Holy Spirit He gave to His Apostles, done in His Name.
On the same vain, ( and I do understand why the Church differentiates between mortal and vain) but do you know what made the decision that there were two types of sins and that confessing directly to God can only receive forgiveness for one, but not the other? ( Not including the un-pardonable sin)
Show me where confessing to God ALONE is permitted for the forgiveness of sins? Venial sins are given forgiveness by the Eucharist itself and is the only other way, besides Penance.
Sins are rightly evaluated according to their gravity. The distinction between mortal and venial sin, already evident in Scripture,129 became part of the tradition of the Church. It is corroborated by human experience.
Mortal sin destroys charity in the heart of man by a grave violation of God’s law; it turns man away from God, who is his ultimate end and his beatitude, by preferring an inferior good to him.
Venial sin allows charity to subsist, even though it offends and wounds it.
Mortal sin, by attacking the vital principle within us - that is, charity - necessitates a new initiative of God’s mercy and a conversion of heart which is normally accomplished within the setting of the sacrament of reconciliation:
When the will sets itself upon something that is of its nature incompatible with the charity that orients man toward his ultimate end, then the sin is mortal by its very object . . . whether it contradicts the love of God, such as blasphemy or perjury, or the love of neighbor, such as homicide or adultery. . . . But when the sinner’s will is set upon something that of its nature involves a disorder, but is not opposed to the love of God and neighbor, such as thoughtless chatter or immoderate laughter and the like, such sins are venial.130 129 Cf.
1 Jn 5:16-17.
130 St. Thomas Aquinas,
STh I-II,88,2,
corp. art.