- Status
N
Nepperhan
Guest
N
Nepperhan
Guest
The scene happens to be very appropriate as to our discussion. I hope you can see the point.
C
Cathoholic
Guest
Nepperhan impugning my motives as to WHY I don’t have the time or interest to dive into these types of conspiracy theories . . .
But if you want to think that Nepperhan, you go ahead and think whatever you want.
(Your guys just wasted almost three “news-years” of their life chasing after silly Russian conspiracy theories. I remember Matthews saying the darndest thing. I recall him saying he expects Trump to start speaking Russian any time now. It was complete and utter non-sense.
But the left in America lapped that kind of stuff up. Night after night. For YEARS.)
I think you are ignorant of my motives.
But if you want to think that Nepperhan, you go ahead and think whatever you want.
(Your guys just wasted almost three “news-years” of their life chasing after silly Russian conspiracy theories. I remember Matthews saying the darndest thing. I recall him saying he expects Trump to start speaking Russian any time now. It was complete and utter non-sense.
But the left in America lapped that kind of stuff up. Night after night. For YEARS.)
Last edited:
N
Nepperhan
Guest
The Republican senate committee just wrote that there was a Russian effort to influence our elections and that they tried to foist negative info about Hillary to the RNC and Manafort was huddled up with them. That’s what Republicans determined.
C
Cathoholic
Guest
Nepperhan . . .
Your guys just wasted almost three “news-years” of their life chasing after silly Russian conspiracy theories
N
Nepperhan
Guest
You spin it any way you want to.
“A sprawling report released Tuesday by a Republican-controlled Senate panel that spent three years investigating Russia’s interference in the 2016 election laid out an extensive web of contacts between Trump campaign advisers and Kremlin officials and other Russians, including at least one intelligence officer and others tied to the country’s spy services.”
G.O.P.-Led Senate Panel Details Ties Between 2016 Trump Campaign and Russia (Published 2020)
A nearly 1,000-page report confirmed the special counsel’s findings at a moment when President Trump’s allies have sought to undermine that inquiry.
R
RidgeSprinter
Guest
We apologists have a term for that. Invincible Ignorance
R
RidgeSprinter
Guest
Saw it 10 years later. Loved it.
C
Cathoholic
Guest
The Russian collusion narrative was fake.
Any presidential election is going to have contacts with ALL bigger countries.
The Russian Collusion narrative was a conspiracy theory that many leftists wasted three years eating up that FAKE news, and turned out to be a hoax.
And we all know what Pope Francis says about some who like their news FAKE.
People that got their news from high accuracy sources like Breitbart, FoxNews, LifeSiteNews, and others were not fooled.
Any presidential election is going to have contacts with ALL bigger countries.
The Russian Collusion narrative was a conspiracy theory that many leftists wasted three years eating up that FAKE news, and turned out to be a hoax.
And we all know what Pope Francis says about some who like their news FAKE.
People that got their news from high accuracy sources like Breitbart, FoxNews, LifeSiteNews, and others were not fooled.
Last edited:
N
Nepperhan
Guest
Breitbart, under the aegis of Steve Bannon, had a column called “Black Crime”. That’s a violation of journalistic ethics at least and certainly bad form. You just go on ahead and call is high accuracy. It is not a reputable media outlet.
" Founded in 2005 by the conservative writer Andrew Breitbart, Breitbart News achieved greater influence and a wider audience under its executive chairman, Steve Bannon, who went on to run Donald Trump’s presidential campaign in 2016. For years, the publication used a “black crime” tag on articles and promoted anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant views."
Facebook includes Breitbart in new 'high quality' news tab
The social media site has received backlash over its choice to include a publication that has been called ‘the platform for the alt-right’
www.theguardian.com
but you go ahead and think it is highly accurate. I would say it is highly unethical.
V
Victoria33
Guest
So what?
This is off topic to start talking about these sources but abortions are performed on up to half of all unborn African American chidren. Democrats stand behind those laws and Planned Parenthood and the 2016 presidential nominee Clinton even received the Margaret Sanger award. These are the people who should be questioned on racism.
This is off topic to start talking about these sources but abortions are performed on up to half of all unborn African American chidren. Democrats stand behind those laws and Planned Parenthood and the 2016 presidential nominee Clinton even received the Margaret Sanger award. These are the people who should be questioned on racism.
C
Cathoholic
Guest
Nepperhan . . .
The same msm outlets that base THEIR stories and internal decisions based upon the color of prople’s skin which I have been posting here for years but somehow you’ve seemed to miss that.
Breitbart isn’t perfect. But they are light years better than the msm.
Many leftists are comfortably ignorant of that.
Which is WHY so many leftists happily ate-up almost three years of FAKE News regarding a phony Russian Collusion narrative.
That’s WHY the left is satisfied with burying stories about Jeffery Epstein and Bill Clinton.
That’s WHY the left is AOK with ignoring FAKE News stories they know are FAKE (to the readers: see here. They even get ignored in this thread making my point for me! But here it is again for your sake).
ABC “News” played fake Syrian War footage not telling its viewers.
It was associated with (you guessed it) criticism of President Trump (what a surprise).
Here are some of the details.
.
That’s just what I was thinking about the msm media outlets.
The same msm outlets that base THEIR stories and internal decisions based upon the color of prople’s skin which I have been posting here for years but somehow you’ve seemed to miss that.
Breitbart isn’t perfect. But they are light years better than the msm.
Many leftists are comfortably ignorant of that.
Which is WHY so many leftists happily ate-up almost three years of FAKE News regarding a phony Russian Collusion narrative.
That’s WHY the left is satisfied with burying stories about Jeffery Epstein and Bill Clinton.
That’s WHY the left is AOK with ignoring FAKE News stories they know are FAKE (to the readers: see here. They even get ignored in this thread making my point for me! But here it is again for your sake).
ABC “News” played fake Syrian War footage not telling its viewers.
It was associated with (you guessed it) criticism of President Trump (what a surprise).
Here are some of the details.
.
Last edited:
Is this as unethical as the 1619 Project. If so, that’s pretty bad, putting Breitbart in a category with the NYT.
Last edited:
S
StudentMI
Guest
I find most media outlets to be like tabloids, and the out and out tabloids to be sometimes better than the news. But that’s just me.
- Status