L
latinmasslover
Guest
To those of you who dislike the new rite but still attend because, technically (assuming the 4 conditions are met) it’s valid: how do you get through it without losing your peace?
It’s not easy. I usually start joking with the Lord about my feeling of alienation by silently praying: O Lord, I thank Thee that I am not like other men . . …To those of you who dislike the new rite but still attend because, technically (assuming the 4 conditions are met) it’s valid: how do you get through it without losing your peace?
Short answer, prayers of Reparation.To those of you who dislike the new rite but still attend because, technically (assuming the 4 conditions are met) it’s valid: how do you get through it without losing your peace?
“technically it’s valid?”To those of you who dislike the new rite but still attend because, technically (assuming the 4 conditions are met) it’s valid: how do you get through it without losing your peace?
I’m sorry, but I cannot remain silent.It is extremely difficult to attend the NO and not sin in the process due to the revulsion engendered by the plethora of liturgical abuse.
However, I attempt to “offer it up” and find some peace in doing so.
And yes, there are a few parishes celebrating the NO that do so in the manner intended with little liturgical abuse. One may only hope that this number may grow in the future.
Mass is valid if there is the proper form, matter, and intent. If one of these is missing then you have an invalid Mass (which technically would be no Mass at all),“technically it’s valid?”
It’s valid, period. It’s the Ordinary Form of the Mass in the Catholic Church.
In the future you may wish to actually read what someone writes before responding so rudely.You feel “revulsion” towards the Mass? Perceived abuses or not you need to talk to someone about that!
At no point did Spera in Deo say that he feels revulsion towards the Mass. He said that he feels revulsion towards a Mass full of Liturgical abuses. Big difference here.It is extremely difficult to attend the NO and not sin in the process due to the revulsion engendered by the plethora of liturgical abuse.
And yes, there are a few parishes celebrating the NO that do so in the manner intended with little liturgical abuse. One may only hope that this number may grow in the future.

Oh, come on. That seems like blaming the victim.You feel “revulsion” towards the Mass? Perceived abuses or not you need to talk to someone about that!
Indeed. And it all started before the First Sunday of Advent in 1969. It took me till 1983 to find my reverent OF parish - the only abuses I have ever seen were at diocesan events - to the point where I refused to sing at diocesan events - you want to bring out liturgical dancers wafting bowls of incense and waving 10’ high banners with ribbon streamers, fine. I cannot in good conscience participate.The OF is not the problem. The problem is with the priests and “liturgists” who think that the OF gives them license to do whatever they want.
I’m surprised – I figured Calgary (and Alberta in general) would be more conservative than either the Left Coast or us Eastern bustards who freeze in the dark.But the fact remains: unless someone can point me in a good direction, the vast majority of OF Masses in Calgary are poorly celebrated, there are too many “children’s” Masses, and standing at the Consecration seems to be a universal practice. In a few churches I’ve attended, there are drums, Protestant “praise and worship” music, and the use of unapproved liturgical and lectionary texts. It’s really painful, especially because I know what a reverently-celebrated OF Mass looks like. Moreover, it appears (I may be wrong) that Canadians don’t seem to care as much as the Americans.
Well, as I said, I could be wrong. Other than you and me (and I’m not even a Canadian, yet), I haven’t really seen many Canadians screaming bloody hell on these forums over liturgical abuses.I’m surprised – I figured Calgary (and Alberta in general) would be more conservative than either the Left Coast or us Eastern bustards who freeze in the dark.
Here in Toronto, Holy Family (King & Dufferin) and St Vincent de Paul (Roncesvalles near Queen) are run by the Oratorians of St Philip Neri; the Shrine of the Little Flower in Scarborough is FSSP. Holy Cross Parish (Cosburn & Donlands), which always had a reverent, by-the-book English liturgy, now has Latin weekday Masses (FSSP; same priests as the Shrine).
These are pretty much the only ones I’ve been to regularly.
The other ones I’ve been to once or twice:
St Edith Stein, Thorncliffe Park (Carmelites of Mary Immaculate). Share space with Thorncliffe Park United Church, so you can imagine the architecture.
- St Michael’s Cathedral, Church & Shuter. The Archdiocesan church. Choir provided by St Michael’s Choir School. Went to Midnight Mass there. Beautiful and reverent, but I don’t consider “City of God” to be a Christmas hymn.
- St Basil’s, Bay south of Bloor (Basilian Fathers). Beautiful church, straightforward Mass.
- St Patrick’s Parish, Queen & McCaul. Redemptorists. Another beautiful church. Didn’t stay for Mass, I just happened to be walking by and decided to visit. I do remember a lot of people praying in the church, and one fellow in the main aisle, hands clasped, advancing on his knees toward the altar.
Our Lady of Lourdes, Sherbourne south of Bloor. Jesuits. Some of the Fathers were at St Pius X church and Gonzaga high school back when I was there. Only there once, nothing sticks out in my mind.
St Peter’s, Bathurst subway station. Paulist Fathers. Not the most traditional, IMHO – stripped-down architecture, plain table altar, guitar player in the sanctuary, priest giving the homily from the centre aisle, can’t follow the Mass in the missalettes, etc.
It’s hard for me to tell for the Masses I went to over a year or so ago. As I have stated many times before, I grew up thinking of the OF as “the” Mass. I knew nothing about “abuses” or the GIRM – all I knew was what was either in the Living with Christ missalette or the Catholic Book of Worship, and whether the priest “changed the words”. I do remember some things I saw which prompted me to think, “Can he do that?”, others which got me thinking “Is he making this up as he goes along?” Only after coming here have I found that there actually is a set form for the Mass that is not supposed to be deviated from.
Parish to parish, I guess it’s hit-or-miss as to the particular reverence/fidelity of the Mass, depending on each pastor, except where the parish is administered by an order, in which that order’s philosophy would shine through, I imagine.
As for Canadians caring less than Americans – what brings you to that conclusion? (Not that I’m disagreeing, I just want to know your views.)