M
manualman
Guest
The league’s argument is not primarily one of “it’s not so bad, they all do it too.” Of course not!
The league is pointing out a clear double standard and demanding equal treatment under the law. If the law is going to be written in such a way that an entire institution is accountable when individuals commit crimes (be they direct crimes or abetting crimes), then why not make the whole school district liable? Why? Because the lawmakers recognize that such a law would place a painful burden on taxpayers/voters. Lawmakers don’t want to do that. But they have no problem at placing such a burden on the people of the church.
Decrying such a double standard in no way argues that the crime is less since others are doing it too.
Penny, your analogy would work better if the TEACHER of the first grade class were caught molesting a student and that student’s folks sued the entire district into bankruptcy such that the remainder of the class gets no education. That’s justice? No, that’s the freeway to anarchy.
The league is pointing out a clear double standard and demanding equal treatment under the law. If the law is going to be written in such a way that an entire institution is accountable when individuals commit crimes (be they direct crimes or abetting crimes), then why not make the whole school district liable? Why? Because the lawmakers recognize that such a law would place a painful burden on taxpayers/voters. Lawmakers don’t want to do that. But they have no problem at placing such a burden on the people of the church.
Decrying such a double standard in no way argues that the crime is less since others are doing it too.
Penny, your analogy would work better if the TEACHER of the first grade class were caught molesting a student and that student’s folks sued the entire district into bankruptcy such that the remainder of the class gets no education. That’s justice? No, that’s the freeway to anarchy.