Raymond Arroyo?

  • Thread starter Thread starter godisgood77
  • Start date Start date
He and Laura Ingraham had a chuckle at the amount of water witness George Kent consumed.

He shows his politics when he’s on Laura. I’m sure he has audience that watch him on Fox because he’s on EWTN.

Could you imagine Mother Angelica laughing at someone for drinking water?
 
Last edited:
I wasn’t even thinking about any secular news station when I made that post. Another poster had to step in with what she felt was a “gotch ya”. All I did was make a comparison of other secular news sources.

I like EWTN and I do trust their news. I like the National Catholic Register, and the Catholic New Agency. The National Catholic Reporter is a different story.
 
Yes, I can imagine Mother Anglica laughing at someone drinking water. I can imagine her laughing at herself for doing it, too. I can imagine her making a cute comment with an insight into human nature.

I did not see the Laura/Raymond clip, so I have no opinion on it.
 
Do you trust Monsignor Dario Vigano, former head of the Vatican’s communications department to give you unvarnished truth in Vatican News?
(name removed by moderator). Look up Monsignor Dario Vigano.

See what he did to fool his readers.

Notice he was not relieved of his duties, until after public exposure of this.

Notice also that he was promptly given another position of authority elsewhere within the Vatican.

This is another example of “drama” within the Vatican communications realm.

There are others and if I took time, I could post them.
But these are two overt examples (the Monsignor Dario Vigano scandal, and
the denial of prostration to an idol took place
at a “service” at the Vatican recently.

Draw your own conclusions on this.


This along with a bishop excoriating a reporter at the Pan-Amazonian Synod that asked about child sacrifice among some of the indigenous the Amazon.

He immediately shot back that is false and there is no child sacrifice going on here!

When it was publicly pointed out the next day that
not only was there child sacrifice going on (discussed here),
but it was even acknowledged by his own bishops group’s website
back in South America.

Instead of coming out and saying he was wrong, the bishops web page site back in South America got scrubbed and he was silent.)
 
Last edited:
Interesting that Boston Catholic TV is able to run their station successfully without appeals to overt politicization.
 
They are Catholic TV dot org, right? I do appreciate their politics free programming
 
(name removed by moderator) . . .
I would think that someone who was using multiple sources . . .
That’s right.

But it is also part of my point.

That you HAVE to go to other multiple sources at times.

Vatican news people are not always trustworthy news sources.

There has also been plenty of “drama” within the Vatican Communications realm.
 
Last edited:
Then use NCR and Catholic News Agency.

No need to go to Remnant, lifesite , and Churchmillitant
 
Feanor2 . . .
Then use NCR and Catholic News Agency.

No need to go to Remnant, lifesite , and Churchmillitant
Why do you think
you get to tell me
what websites
I need or don’t need to use?
 
Last edited:
It isn’t a good look either way. This is just my opinion, the show on Fox he frequents is highly partisan on issues, like Immigration, and the show is often incongruent with Catholic teaching on Immigration, for example.
 
Is EWTN hard right? Or is it that they are just orthodox in their views and lean more traditional.
For . . . some on the Left . . . anyone who doesn’t support them is called “alt-right”. This is the state of politics in America today. Following this logic, if you don’t support abortion, you are alt-right. If you don’t vote democrat, you are alt-right. If you are a traditional catholic, you are alt-right.
A century ago and in a different context, this phenomenon was called “the dictatorship of the proletariat”.
 
Last edited:
It isn’t a good look either way. This is just my opinion, the show on Fox he frequents is highly partisan on issues, like Immigration, and the show is often incongruent with Catholic teaching on Immigration, for example.
Yes, but most Catholic media figures represent Catholicism very poorly, so this is hardly new.
 
For the lunatic left, anyone who doesn’t support them is called “alt-right”. This is the state of politics in America today. Following this logic, if you don’t support abortion, you are alt-right. If you don’t vote democrat, you are alt-right. If you are a traditional catholic, you are alt-right.
A century ago and in a different context, this phenomenon was called “the dictatorship of the proletariat”.
If I’ve ever read a post of “I never talk to actual liberal, I just regurgitate what right wing media tells me about liberals”, this one might take the prize.
 
“I never talk to actual liberal, I just regurgitate what right wing media tells me about liberals”, this one might take the prize.
Talking to my liberal father in law as well as several co-workers, I can assure you this post is accurate. Everything that does not conform is hard right or alt-right.
 
Last edited:
Talking to my liberal father in law as well as several co-workers, I can assure you this post is accurate. Everything that does not conform is hard right or alt-right.
It’s probably just that your father in law doesn’t like you and your co-workers are egging you on.
 
You would know… wouldn’t you.
Is a question mark missing here? I know my father-in-law liked to mess with me on politics. It was fun until Trump got elected. He thought Trump was disgusting. It stopped being fun for him after that. I never minded.
After all, they don’t support the narrative.
Nah, I don’t really take what the personal experiences that conservatives claim to have had very seriously on this site. Maybe you’re telling the truth. But most of the time, I find that conservatives exaggerate or out and out throw falsehoods out there to support their narrative. Furthermore, in my world full of actual liberals (and I’m not one of them), I don’t hear people talk like this.
 
But most of the time, I find that conservatives exaggerate or out and out throw falsehoods out there to support their narrative.
And you think people will believe you after the demonstrated disbelief on your part?
 
Back
Top