R
RidgeSprinter
Guest
And what exactly is your point?
I am sharing my perspective. I think the NewsGuard site maybe at its founding tried to less bias and that that is why it added sites like Daily Wire and Daily Caller as trusted sites but that has changed and now Daily Wire and Daily Caller too are on the "Red list " - sites not to trust.Ah, you are sharing an article and not your own perspective. Okay. Thank you for sharing.
That did this year and for good reasons.You seem to insist that 2020 that Vermont which only has a population of 623,000 now has over 503,000 registered voters when in prior years that was not the case at all , the registered voters were around 400,000 to 410,000. Percentage of registered voters do not change dramatically .
A site can challenge its rating with evidence. A site can only get different ratings over time through its behavior. Ex: if a site begins to correct errors and continues to do so then it’s rating in correcting errors could be updated. The ratings are not static.that is why it added sites like Daily Wire and Daily Caller as trusted sites but that has changed and now
Still what is your point?The population does not change a whole lot. There are no big jumps, a few thousand…
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
How are you getting 471,619 for registered voters at 100% if 68% of registered voters in 2016 was 274.000?Registered voters in Vermont, 2016: 471,619
Yes, both sides do it but this is a Presidential election and there has never been more potential for corruption than in this election.
I took it more as a statement on Fox than a statement on the Actors. But to bring this full circle…Yes, both sides do it but this
Stacey initially considered challenging the results, but ultimately conceded. She went on to create “Fair Fight 2020” - an organization that concentrated on fighting for voter rights across 20 states. Her organization is credited with getting an estimated 800,000 people registered to vote in Georgia.I have no empirical evidence that I would have achieved a higher number of votes. However, I have sufficient and I think legally sufficient doubt about the process to say that it was not a fair election.
Divide the number by the percent in decimal form to get your answer.So 274,000 is equal to 68 percent what number is equal to 100 percent?
Already did the math and gave the answer which is 403,000 but many are disagreeing.Divide the number by the percent in decimal form to get your answer.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
Not that this has anything to do with the 2020 election.
Again, you can take it up with the state if you think they don’t know how many registered voters they have.Puer.dei quoted that the new figure/ number for this year of registered voters is 502,507 . That seems like a very high number of registered voters.
how did you figure that it is too high?Puer.dei quoted that the new figure/ number for this year of registered voters is 502,507 . That seems like a very high number of registered voters.
In 2019 an estimated 81.7% of the population was of voting age.I guess they don’t have many children in Vermont because the whole population of the state is only 629,000 and the population has been stable for many years.
As of Tuesday morning, 481,111 state residents were listed on Vermont’s voter rolls, about 92.5 percent of the state’s approximately 520,000 eligible votes. That’s roughly 16,000 more than two years ago, when registration peaked ahead of election day in 2016.
Data from the secretary of state’s office shows the uptick in registered voters has been driven largely by the state’s new automatic voter registration system, which took effect in January 2017.
The system allows voters to register automatically when they receive or update their driver’s licenses, or other forms of identification, at the Department of Motor Vehicles.
Between January 1 and October 11 of 2018, about 16,000 of the 30,400 voter registrations were completed through the new automatic system. About 7,000 of those registrations were completed using the secretary of state’s online system.
With driver’s licenses due to be renewed every four years, Secretary of State Jim Condos expects the new system will continue to bring in a spike of registrations for the next few years.
“It takes us a full cycle before we get everybody,” he said. “The goal is we’re going to get as many eligible Vermonters as possible to be registered to vote.”
Condos said that so far, voters have requested about 27,000 early voting ballots, and he thinks the number of early ballots cast in this year’s elections will surpass the number cast during the last midterm elections in 2014: roughly 34,000.
“We expect to see a huge influx of requests coming in in the next three weeks,” he said.
Vermont’s registration rate is higher than the national average, which is also climbing. National voting rights experts say Vermont “leads the way” on getting residents onto voter rolls. Only 70 percent of Americans reported being registered to vote in 2016, though the actual figure is probably about 10 points higher after figuring in people who did not answer the question.
gam197:
how did you figure that it is too high?Puer.dei quoted that the new figure/ number for this year of registered voters is 502,507 . That seems like a very high number of registered voters.
The number seems too high with 520, 000 eligible voters in the state. in 2016 when the population of the state in 2016As of Tuesday morning, 481,111 state residents were listed on Vermont’s voter rolls, about 92.5 percent of the state’s approximately 520,000 eligible votes. That’s roughly 16,000 more than two years ago, when registration peaked ahead of election day in 2016.
According to the US census bureauThe number seems too high with 520, 000 eligible voters in the state. in 2016 when the population of the state in 2016
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
I believe the state has 25 percent of the population is under age 18. There are children in the stat
I am not using registered voters, I am using the current number combined votes for Trump and Biden.How are you getting 471,619 for registered voters at 100% if 68% of registered voters in 2016 was 274.000?
gam197:
e number seems too high with 520, 000 eligible voters in the state. in 2016 when the population of the state in 2016
According to the US census bureau(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
I believe the state has 25 percent of the population is under age 18. There are children in the stat
18.3% of the population in Vermont is under 18
So now Vermont has no children or very few. children
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
No Vermont has 24 percent under age 18(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
What’s your source for this statement?No Vermont has 24 percent under age 18
If you take
520,000 (eligible voters)/ 623657 (population for 2016) = 83.38% of the population is eligible to vote
I don’t believe that 520000 eligible voters is too high.
Considering that 2016 population estimates are not current.
and current us census bureau estimates 18.3% of the population in Vermont is under 18
You are taking this 520,000 voter registration number out of a population of 629,000 million and everyone as we know does not register to vote.gam197:
I am not using registered voters, I am using the current number combined votes for Trump and Biden.How are you getting 471,619 for registered voters at 100% if 68% of registered voters in 2016 was 274.000?
Current Status
338362 / 502,607 *100 = 67%
Assuming that was not an increase in registered voters:
338362 / 471619 * 100 = 71%
Not much change in Voter Participation either way.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)