Republican Primaries

[Monte_RCMS]

Thanks for the laugh! It’s difficult to be optimistic when I think of the future my daughters and granddaughter have in store for them, thanks to the radical left. Rob

[uhhh … i was serious]

 

[jomoco]

[uhhh … i was serious]

Obama is carrying on every aspect of the bush admin’s neocon agenda, fighting neverending wars on credit, caving to the WTO’s new world order agenda, signing into law new poisonous “free trade” agreements with panama columbia and south korea, letting Wall street continue robbing us blind, letting the homeless population grow while we bulldoze homes in America like they were palestinian enclaves.

Obama has morphed into an exact replica of george junior, obediently ennacting the neocon wetdream into reality here in America, so what’s the basis of your beef with him other than his color shading?

Look what george started, and tell me that obama hasn’t carried out the same agenda quite faithfully in almost every detail, including healthcare handouts to big corps to profit from as mandates?

The dems and reps are two sides of the same toxic neocon coin.

jomoco

 

[RACJ]

[uhhh … i was serious]

I KNOW that you are serious! Communists are the same the world over. Now, I never heard of the Zimbabwe “model”, but since they are Communist re-distributors, the results are as they always are: Seize wealth and property, and bring misery and poverty for all but the top 2% “ruling class”. Only a sick person would want to do that to America. Rob

 

[RACJ]

Obama is carrying on every aspect of the bush admin’s neocon agenda, fighting neverending wars on credit, caving to the WTO’s new world order agenda, signing into law new poisonous “free trade” agreements with panama columbia and south korea, letting Wall street continue robbing us blind, letting the homeless population grow while we bulldoze homes in America like they were palestinian enclaves.

Obama has morphed into an exact replica of george junior, obediently ennacting the neocon wetdream into reality here in America, so what’s the basis of your beef with him other than his color shading?

Look what george started, and tell me that obama hasn’t carried out the same agenda quite faithfully in almost every detail, including healthcare handouts to big corps to profit from as mandates?

The dems and reps are two sides of the same toxic neocon coin.

jomoco

I was sickened by Bush's big spending, esp. the TARP slush fund, and BHO has become Bush on super steroids. I had PLENTY of problems with GWB, esp. his belief that the taxpayer treasure was his to dispense as he saw fit, trying to throw money at all the world's ills. I don't like radical leftists of all skin pigmentations, and I'm sure that all others on my side feel the same way. For those Democrats hung up on race, why not vote for Herman Cain this time? He's a REAL American who loves his country!! :) Rob:)

 

[Scott_Lafrance]

I would disagree with this list, to the extent that this one should be #1:

1. Move “tax day” to the first Monday of November. That is the day that all tax forms and tax checks are due to the IRS. Also, consequently, the day before voting day.

AND, end the process of withholding of taxes. They would be payable in ONE LUMP SUM ON TAX DAY. Instead of people getting taxes deducted all throughout the year and then saying they got money back when they filed their return.

You just rephrased what I was trying to say in #2.

 

[Monte_RCMS]

Sen. Marco Rubio has your answer…
youtube.com/watch?v=zAsgFcFj0ls

Unemployment is back up to 9.2% today, btw.

More from Marco Rubio:

lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=625705

“We Don’t Need New Taxes, We Need New Taxpayers”

Real Clear Politics, by Marco Rubio

Original Article

realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/07/07/sen_rubio_we_dont_need_new_taxes_we_need_new_taxpayers.html

Posted 7/8/2011

"Our total debt is about to reach the size of our entire economy. That’s kind of the framework in which we’re operating in when we discuss this. Now, I actually think we’re closer to some sort of agreement on this, Sen. Ayotte, than a lot of people realize. "I’ve heard the term thrown around in the last couple days, a ‘balanced approach’ to dealing with it, and I think there’s agreement that there has to be a balanced approach. I certainly have always said that you cannot simply cut your way out of this problem.

Comments:
I really like this young man. He gets it. He sure has a bright future in our party.

Post Reply
Reply 1 -
He is the Republicans future if we can get past the present.

It’s now that counts–and so far the present isn’t looking so bright.

Reply 2 -
I voted for Rubio. Compare this man to our other Senator … Nelson that is … Put them both on a teeter totter and Nelson would create a sinkhole.

Reply 3 -
Can’t wait for November 2012.

Hope we can last that long.

Reply 4 -
The best campaign slogan I’ve heard yet. Gets to the heart of the Economic Problem.

29 replies ]

 

[valentino]

When Obama was a youth, he was “tutored” for many years by a man named Frank Marshall Davis, who was, in fact, a Communist ideologue.

You need to look up a variety of references to the relationship between Obama and Frank Marshall Davis. It’s very important.

thanks.No i didn/t know that.

 

[SalesianSDB]

Economically, I’d say Obama is more Keynesian than Marxist

 

[Raskolnikov]

Economically, I’d say Obama is more Keynesian than Marxist

Exactly.

 

[Monte_RCMS]

Economically, I’d say Obama is more Keynesian than Marxist

Suggestion: do the research on the relationship between Obama and Frank Marshall Davis. There has been a LOT written about it.

Your curiosity should be really kicking into high gear!

Here … here is one place to start browsing and reading.

usasurvival.org/comamerica.html

usasurvival.org/agenda10-21.html

Scroll down a little … and then visit the other pages …

And then, based on your reading do some Google searches on your own.

 

[valentino]

Obama is carrying on every aspect of the bush admin’s neocon agenda, fighting neverending wars on credit, caving to the WTO’s new world order agenda, signing into law new poisonous “free trade” agreements with panama columbia and south korea, letting Wall street continue robbing us blind, letting the homeless population grow while we bulldoze homes in America like they were palestinian enclaves.

Obama has morphed into an exact replica of george junior, obediently ennacting the neocon wetdream into reality here in America, so what’s the basis of your beef with him other than his color shading?

Look what george started, and tell me that obama hasn’t carried out the same agenda quite faithfully in almost every detail, including healthcare handouts to big corps to profit from as mandates?

The dems and reps are two sides of the same toxic neocon coin.

jomoco

I don’t believe the current rep.party particularly the legistlature Is so willing to cave now.their still going to bend(this system is in such a mess).I do believe they realize to some extent how bad their rep.party ancestors were in letting this nation go down the path of socialism.And also helping it along.Its hard to deny when the facts are hitting you in the face.

 

[Scott_Lafrance]

Economically, I’d say Obama is more Keynesian than Marxist

Keynesianism is just a detour on the road to Marxism.

 

[Raskolnikov]

Keynesianism is just a detour on the road to Marxism.

Not even remotely true. Kenyesianism rejects all the basic reses of Marxism and acceptws almost all the premises of classical economic theory. In fact, Keynes concieved of his ideas as an opposition to Marxism, during the Great Depression, as a way to fit the Great Depression into a modified classical framework rather than having to accept the Marxist exaplanations that were gaining ground because they had predicted a catastrophic collapse like the one that happened.

Keynes was an anti-Marxist, who’d ideas are respected in the economics discipline and some have even been incorporated into the fundamental framework of modern economics, while Marx’s economic theory is condidered to be utterly discredited. They are worlds apart. Keynes actually once said something to the effect of, ‘it is a tragedy that the only religion the youth today have to grow up with is communism.’

 

[Big_Ro]

Not even remotely true. Kenyesianism rejects all the basic [reses of Marxism and acceptws almost all the premises of classical economic theory. In fact, Keynes concieved of his ideas as an opposition to Marxism, during the Great Depression, as a way to fit the Great Depression into a modified classical framework rather than having to accept the Marxist exaplanations that were gaining ground because they had predicted a catastrophic collapse like the one that happened.

Keynes was an anti-Marxist, who’d ideas are respected in the economics discipline and some have even been incorporated into the fundamental framework of modern economics, while Marx’s economic theory is condidered to be utterly discredited. They are worlds apart. Keynes actually once said something to the effect of, ‘it is a tragedy that the only religion the youth today have to grow up with is communism.’

This is absolutely correct. Those that constantly try and ply their brainwashing techniques that cast anyone or any thought outside the ever more narrow conservative/Republican economic philosophyas being “socialist” or “communist” or Marxist fail against those more self possesed and knowledgable. The last thirty years of economic history have demonstrated utterly the complete failure of this riduculous theory. I was in my early twenties and studying economics in College whe I first heard the theory. I laughed so hard I cried. It’s John Batiste Says Fallacy in action. That it has become the foundation of modern economic thought is root cause of our current economic problems. Those are the facts deal with it.
[/quote]

 

[RACJ]

This is absolutely correct. Those that constantly try and ply their brainwashing techniques that cast anyone or any thought outside the ever more narrow conservative/Republican economic philosophyas being “socialist” or “communist” or Marxist fail against those more self possesed and knowledgable. The last thirty years of economic history have demonstrated utterly the complete failure of this riduculous theory. I was in my early twenties and studying economics in College whe I first heard the theory. I laughed so hard I cried. It’s John Batiste Says Fallacy in action. That it has become the foundation of modern economic thought is root cause of our current economic problems. Those are the facts deal with it.

OK, if BHO is not a Communist, why have Communists such as Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, Anita Dunn and Van Jones surrounded him during his entire life? OF COURSE, to become President, he had to pretend to be a "Keynesian". No American candidate would ever *admit* that *his* Founding Fathers are Marx and Lenin rather than Jefferson and Madison! PALIN/RUBIO '12!! :D

 

[SalesianSDB]

I just have to post this. Conservative comedic pundit, P.J. O’Rourke, talking with Bill Maher on Obama being a socialist. While Maher tries to prove P.J. wrong, I like P.J.'s response.
youtube.com/watch?v=NuRVlOJ1RIE

Obama may be a socialist, but he’s pretty bad at it.

 

[Raskolnikov]

OK, if BHO is not a Communist, why have Communists such as Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, Anita Dunn and Van Jones surrounded him during his entire life? OF COURSE, to become President, he had to pretend to be a “Keynesian”. No American candidate would ever admit that his Founding Fathers are Marx and Lenin rather than Jefferson and Madison! PALIN/RUBIO '12!!

I know at least a few of my professors have socialist sympathies. One, my academic advisor and the professor to whom I am closest, is I believe a democratic socialist. He’s a good professor and a knowledgeble historian, and I wouldn’t pretend otherwise because I disagree with his politics. I will most liekly continue to correspond with him long after I graduate .

The reason I tell you this is because I shutter to think that, should I ever run for office (never gonna happen, but hypothetically…) people like you will call me a socialist and a Marxist because I didn’t cut all contact with all my old professors and banish everyone who isn’t in close agreement with my own political views.

 

[bbarrick8383]

I know at least a few of my professors have socialist sympathies. One, my academic advisor and the professor to whom I am closest, is I believe a democratic socialist. He’s a good professor and a knowledgeble historian, and I wouldn’t pretend otherwise because I disagree with his politics. I will most liekly continue to correspond with him long after I graduate .

The reason I tell you this is because I shutter to think that, should I ever run for office (never gonna happen, but hypothetically…) people like you will call me a socialist and a Marxist because I didn’t cut all contact with all my old professors and banish everyone who isn’t in close agreement with my own political views.

Was your father/father figure as a child a communist?

 

[Raskolnikov]

Was your father/father figure as a child a communist?

I’m sure Fox news would have no trouble convincing a great many people that this socialist professor of mine is my surrogate father. The media has convinced people of crazier things.

And don’t you think it is rather presumptuous to asuume that a man’s beliefs must be a function of those of his father figure or his pastor?

 

[bbarrick8383]

I’m sure Fox news would have no trouble convincing a great many people that this socialist professor of mine is my surrogate father. The media has convinced people of crazier things.

And don’t you think it is rather presumptuous to asuume that a man’s beliefs must be a function of those of his father figure or his pastor?

I think it’s rather presumptuous to say what people would believe because of the media. The number of viewers of the news media is nowhere near the numbers of those who show up at the polls. Rather, there are many more who show up clueless than misinformed by Fox or any other news source.