Republican Primary

  • Thread starter Thread starter rlg94086
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Both Santorum and Romney made gaffs in the last few days. I don’t think either candidate was hurt that much by them. Each have their base of voters. IMHO, neither have been able to reach very far beyond their base.
Nothing compared to Santorum, for they were not gaffs but what he believes.

Jim
 
I haven’t followed it that closely, but it seems to me that Santorum’s beliefs are pretty much just Catholic beliefs.
WHat he expressed on Sunday’s National programs about JFK’s speech and mis-stating Obama’s words and calling him a snob, are not Catholic beliefs.

Jim
 
WHat he expressed on Sunday’s National programs about JFK’s speech and mis-stating Obama’s words and calling him a snob, are not Catholic beliefs.

Jim
As though the Church will ever have a stance on someone’s snobbishness, or someone’s words in a quote. Try harder.
 
The Catholic vote went rather handily for Romney in Michigan.

Why do you think Catholics abadonned Santorum?
Four words. *“It’s The Economy, Silly.” * (Catholics care about the economy, too, don’t they?) Whoever stops talking about the economy will lose the election and guarantee four more years for Obama. That’s more and more likely each passing day.
 
As though the Church will ever have a stance on someone’s snobbishness, or someone’s words in a quote. Try harder.
The Church believes in the seperation of Church and state and opposes bearing false witness against others.

Hope this helps. 😉

Jim
 
Nothing compared to Santorum, for they were not gaffs but what he believes.

Jim
I’m not necessarily either a Santorum or Romney supporter, but at least the former HAS beliefs and convictions! (I know, so did Hitler and Stalin, as well as Obama.) I’m just not sure what beliefs Romney has exactly, and that is why, I think, instead of having broad appeal among conservatives, moderates, and liberals, he’ll wind up having less appeal across the political spectrum.
 
The Church believes in the seperation of Church and state and opposes bearing false witness against others.

Hope this helps. 😉

Jim
Separation of Church and State is supported by the Church,and solidly endorsed by Santorum. Obama’s the one who doesn’t know what the statement means, nor do his anti-anything-religious-or-God-related supporters.

You basically said without mentioning political issues the Church opposes sin. Profound. When Mary, the Mother of Jesus runs for President, PM me. Until then, we can discuss political issues and the Church’s stance, and how the only candidate who is a miserable failure in this regard is the one who conned himself into office in 2008.
 
As though the Church will ever have a stance on someone’s snobbishness, or someone’s words in a quote. Try harder.
Santorum called Obama a snob for his statements in support of a college education for everyone. The Church has no official position on the matter, of course, but U.S. Catholics have been very supportive of higher education for their children and don’t think of it as being snobs. It was a dumb think for Santorum to say.
 
I’m not necessarily either a Santorum or Romney supporter, but at least the former HAS beliefs and convictions! (I know, so did Hitler and Stalin, as well as Obama.) I’m just not sure what beliefs Romney has exactly, and that is why, I think, instead of having broad appeal among conservatives, moderates, and liberals, he’ll wind up having less appeal across the political spectrum.
Romney believes that he’d like to be President.
 
Separation of Church and State is supported by the Church,and solidly endorsed by Santorum. .
Santorum said that when he read JFK’s statement in his 1960 Speech, about the seperation of church and state, it made him want to throw-up.

Santurom claimed Obama said that he wanted every American to go to college as being a snob. Problem is, Santorum was shown that Obama didn’t say this, but that he desired that American students have the opportunity to go on to higher education, whether it be college, technical training or trade school, (I’m paraphrasing here).

So, Santorum either lied about what Obama said, or was mislead himself, which is problematic for a man who wants to be president, but he responded by making a personal attack against the man calling him a snob.

Go watch This Week with George Stephanopoulas, and see Santorums perfomance.

It’s not in line with Catholic teaching and every Catholic should’ve cringed hearing him.

Jim
 
Santorum called Obama a snob for his statements in support of a college education for everyone. The Church has no official position on the matter, of course, but U.S. Catholics have been very supportive of higher education for their children and don’t think of it as being snobs. It was a dumb think for Santorum to say.
Dumb is your opinion, and a fine one to have. Not something the Church has or will ever speak definitively on though, so not relevant to his point.
 
Santorum said that when he read JFK’s statement in his 1960 Speech, about the seperation of church and state, it made him want to throw-up.

Santurom claimed Obama said that he wanted every American to go to college as being a snob. Problem is, Santorum was shown that Obama didn’t say this, but that he desired that American students have the opportunity to go on to higher education, whether it be college, technical training or trade school, (I’m paraphrasing here).

So, Santorum either lied about what Obama said, or was mislead himself, which is problematic for a man who wants to be president, but he responded by making a personal attack against the man calling him a snob.

Go watch This Week with George Stephanopoulas, and see Santorums perfomance.

It’s not in line with Catholic teaching and every Catholic should’ve cringed hearing him.

Jim
I’ll watch later to be fair to the discussion. Obama said some ridiculous things campainging as well, and still had Catholics lining up to elect him. Country is doing really well, too…

Regardless though, he is still so much more in line with Catholic teaching than Obama that if that is the deciding factor, he’d be a no-brainer.
 
Dumb is your opinion, and a fine one to have. Not something the Church has or will ever speak definitively on though, so not relevant to his point.
I don’t understand you first sentence at all. But if I understand you second sentence correctly, I disagree with it. The church has spoken out on education by the very fact that they started Catholic school and universities. Or did I totally misread what you are saying?
 
Santorum called Obama a snob for his statements in support of a college education for everyone. The Church has no official position on the matter, of course, but U.S. Catholics have been very supportive of higher education for their children and don’t think of it as being snobs. It was a dumb think for Santorum to say.
Why was it a dumb thing to say. Having a college education is highly overrated.
 
Why was it a dumb thing to say. Having a college education is highly overrated.
From a practical perspective of getting a decent job, having a college education is probably NOT highly overrated, unless you’re a Bill Gates or a Walter Cronkite. From an educational perspective, it probably IS highly overrated, and I say this as a professor. However, it depends largely on the quality of the faculty and the motivation of the student.
 
From a practical perspective of getting a decent job, having a college education is probably NOT highly overrated, unless you’re a Bill Gates or a Walter Cronkite. From an educational perspective, it probably IS highly overrated, and I say this as a professor. However, it depends largely on the quality of the faculty and the motivation of the student.
I agree with your statement. Unless Santorum wanted the populace to be discussing his views on education, it was a dumb thing to say. I don’t consider home schooling to be the best way to educate one’s child though.
 
Why was it a dumb thing to say. Having a college education is highly overrated.
Depends on what one studies. The current unemployment rate among the college educated is 5%.

A Bachelors in Art History or Philosophy maybe not so useful.

Overall, higher education, whether through a four year college, a vocational school, or aprenticeship is invaluable. I know that my kid is going to pursue higher education come hell or high water, unless she turns out to be dumb as a bag of hammers. 🙂
 
Depends on what one studies. The current unemployment rate among the college educated is 5%.

A Bachelors in Art History or Philosophy maybe not so useful.

Overall, higher education, whether through a four year college, a vocational school, or aprenticeship is invaluable. I know that my kid is going to pursue higher education come hell or high water, unless she turns out to be dumb as a bag of hammers. 🙂
I agree. Except to say that while a liberal arts degree might not immediately translate into a specific career (maybe teaching), if one is motivated, ambitious and doesn’t easily get discouraged, the degree can give one a solid foundation of communication skills that can be applied to a variety of careers.

Ishii
 
Depends on what one studies. The current unemployment rate among the college educated is 5%.
Another meaningless statistic trotted out as truth. Yes, but what kind of employment is it?

Many people with degrees today have to settle for the jobs that people without degrees used to have (parking attendants, waiting tables, etc). After all, most employers would rather have someone with a degree than not when taking a chance on a hire. The degreeless are now more likely to be unemployed. That’s not a glowing endorsement of college education. But you won’t here this reported in the news. All you hear is that 5% stat, which really is a lie. Kind of like how there is no inflation because we no longer count food and energy prices.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top