E
everblooming
Guest
Dear Brother JR,Amy,
I appreciate your feelings. And I ask you to remember that the numbers of abusers are not as large as the media makes it sound. In fact, the number of abusers among Catholic clergy is very small compared to ther segments of society. Why do I post it this way?
One abuse is one too many. I don’t care if it’s by a priest or a next of kin, which is more often the case. That being said, we have to speak about the incredibly large number of religious men and women, priests and deacons, finally bishops, who are good people and are living faithful lives and making great things happen in the Church. All you have to do is turn on EWTN, if you like that station, to see the many great men and women whose lives are deicated to the Church and who are in the priesthood and religious life. Unless we keep this image alive, we can easily fall into the pessimism of the Protestant Reformers of the 1500s. Their weakness was not their concern with errors and abuse in the Church. Their weakness was their inability to see the goodness in the Church and the good people in the Church. As they focussed more and more into the problems, they lost touch with the Church. We can see the result today. They eventually lost touch with the faith and created their own version of the church, with all kinds of errors from which they have been unable to extracate themselves. Instead of a united Christian people, we have multiple Christian communities. But this happens when we do not remember the good.
As I keep saying, we cannot cover the sun with a dime, meaning we cannot cover the truth nor should we try. That being said, the truth is bigger than the abuses. The abuses are part of the truth. There is also goondess and holiness that dominates within the Church. We have to keep that in mind or we become very sour faced saints.
I agree with your pastor about ownership. Ownership implies caring for our Church. That we should all do. It implies making sacrifices and taking some responsibility for our Church. We should all do that too. But you know what, taking ownership means treating the Church as I would my own biological family. I woiuld not present an unbalanced picture of my biological family or tolerate another to do so either.
Finally, as I have told others. If you, the laity, feel badly about this situation, can you imagine what those of us who are priests and religious feel. For me it’s very hard to feel that everyone is going to think that I’m a pervert if I give a kid a hug. It’s very hard when everyone tells us that we can’t be in the parking lot alone with a kid. I’m not talking babies. I’m talkikng high school kids. The situation is such that we are not allowed to be in the parking lot with the teens, even if there is a group of them. There must always be two brothers or a brother and a lay person.
When I go out to do my ministry at the pregnancy centers, I can’t speak to a teenager who is pregnant without another adult in the room. Sometimes these kids do not want to talk in front of an audience. But I’m not allowed to speak to them without another adult, even if the door has a glass. The list of restrictions gets longer by the minute. We can’t even do vocation work with anyone under 18 unless their parent is present.
Many of us religious men and priests feel punished for the sins of the few. In the end, it’s religious men and priests who everyone looks at with disdain. Women religious and deacons don’t get such a bad rap. But we’re being clobbered with bad press and restrictions, while 99% of us are as shocked and helpless as the next guy.
I for one have decided to let it go. Meaning that I can’t change what the media says or what the laity thinks and I’m not leaving religious life because someone else messed up. I’ll have to live with the hard times. Maybe I can offer them up for the life of the unborn, which is my primary ministry.
We have to stick together and pray together. I wish I had a magic wand to make it all go away.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, OSF![]()
I wonder if you are a white man and if this is the first time you have lived somewhere where you have experienced discrimination first-hand? It is a different way of interacting with the world. This is why, for example, therapists need to be careful not to overdiagnose paranoid symptoms with African-American people. It’s not paranoia when people really are staring at you like you might commit a crime. It’s not paranoia when people are really out to get you.
May I make a suggestion with the hugging. I worked in a residential setting w/ elementary school aged kids. We were their primary caregivers. We saw the kids daily, unlike most of the parents who either never visited or barely ever visited. When I was new the staff gained up on me and said that I was being inappropriate hugging the kids and that “someday someone will make an accusation and none of us will back you up because we told you not to hug them”. I came up w/ a compromise, a “side hug”. Other affectionate staff would give side hugs too. With a side hug, you stand side-by-side and you hug. BTW, I worked there over 5 years and not a single kid ever made an accusation against me. But if it ever happens, it would be stressful, but I would survive. I believe that Truth usually prevails eventually.
As for me, I will always have an attachment with the Catholic Church. I received Baptism, Holy Communion and Confirmation; I was raised Catholic and it has had an impact on who I am today. I read and reread Catholic material. I pray all the time. I will pray for you too. Amy