Richard Dawkins to Atheist Rally: 'Show Contempt' for Faith, the Eucharist

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catholic_Press
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Can not a homosexual man who is chaste and continent aspire to the same example as a heterosexual man? I believe such a man can. There’s nothing that makes a heterosexual man superior in that regard.

As it is now, a heterosexual man can be a lustful sinner, confess, be absolved, and aspire to the priesthood. No less should be the homosexual man’s lot if he so desires. I don’t want a heterosexual priest who can’t keep his eyes off women nor a homosexual doing the same towards another man.

Opposite sex attracted and same sex attracted men can both be good priests. I judge the individual without making a blanket condemnation.
I am afraid that the evidence doesn’t support your claim, Rich. The data gathered regarding the clerical sexual abuse scandal is quantitatively clear that same sex attraction predominated in the vast majority of confirmed cases of molestation. These are unassailable facts.

Admitting homosexuals into the priesthood has proven to be a grave misjudgement for the Roman Catholic Church. Homosexuality and the priesthood has been shown to be a toxic combination. This is an unequivocal truth which is supported not only by objective data, but by the sheer scale and scope of the pain and anguish experienced by the victims, the Roman Catholic Church…and by all who love Her.
 
I am afraid that the evidence doesn’t support your claim, Rich. The data gathered regarding the clerical sexual abuse scandal is quantitatively clear that same sex attraction predominated in the vast majority of confirmed cases of molestation. These are unassailable facts.

Admitting homosexuals into the priesthood has proven to be a grave misjudgement for the Roman Catholic Church. Homosexuality and the priesthood has been shown to be a toxic combination. This is an unequivocal truth which is supported not only by objective data, but by the sheer scale and scope of the pain and anguish experienced by the victims, the Roman Catholic Church…and by all who love Her.
What of the homosexual priests who haven’t acted that way? Painting them with the same brush, unfortunately.
 
“Richard Dawkins to Atheist Rally: ‘Show Contempt’ for Faith, the Eucharist”

As far as the spiritual battle goes,
Catholics could always rally back by
showing support for the Faith, by
holding Rosary processions
as well as Eucharistic processions.

:knight2: :highprayer: :byzsoc: :knight1:

“Finally, brethren, be strengthened in the Lord, and in the might of his power. Put you on the armour of God, that you may be able to stand against the deceits of the devil. For our wrestling is not against flesh and blood; but against principalities and power, against the rulers of the world of this darkness, against the spirits of wickedness in the high places. Therefore take unto you the armour of God, that you may be able to resist in the evil day, and to stand in all things perfect.”

~~ Ephesians 6:10-13

:angel1:

St. Michael the Archangel,
defend us in battle.
Be our defense against the wickedness and snares of the Devil.
May God rebuke him, we humbly pray,
and do thou,
O Prince of the heavenly hosts,
by the power of God,
thrust into hell Satan,
and all the evil spirits,
who prowl about the world
seeking the ruin of souls.
Amen.

:amen:
 
Too bad that he made that statement himself.

The people on his discussion forum on Facebook are really quite civil and seem to be somewhat open minded!
 
Can not a homosexual man who is chaste and continent aspire to the same example as a heterosexual man? I believe such a man can. There’s nothing that makes a heterosexual man superior in that regard.

As it is now, a heterosexual man can be a lustful sinner, confess, be absolved, and aspire to the priesthood. No less should be the homosexual man’s lot if he so desires. I don’t want a heterosexual priest who can’t keep his eyes off women nor a homosexual doing the same towards another man.

Opposite sex attracted and same sex attracted men can both be good priests. I judge the individual without making a blanket condemnation.
I think you have a good point. The issue that has caused so much injury and scandal is the abuse of children; not the type of sex attraction. It seems to me that in the public square clerical abuse of children, whether boys or girls, is viewed as atrocious. Sex between consenting adults, however, has not been viewed so negatively by the public. Priests leave the priesthood all the time to marry women. I have never noted public outrage over that.
 
Why would any devout Catholic care what Richard Dawkins says?
Because what he says may be important. If he knew to a dead certainty that there was a terrorist atomic bomb set to be detonated in Times Square, NYC, don’t you think that Catholics might just possibly be interested in that? 🤷
 
First time to watch a video of this Richard Dawkins, find him nauseating to say the least.

Watched him at the end signing books, I’m assuming he’s laughing all the way to the bank, serves him well then to hold rallies to spout his unbelief message.

I have an atheist friend, who doesn’t spout his unbelief, in the end he can’t prove the non-existence of God.

One of his comical quotes is** " I’m an atheist thank God "** 🤷

Praying for Richard Dawkins might be the better option, and leave him to God…
 
I have an atheist friend, who doesn’t spout his unbelief, in the end he can’t prove the non-existence of God.
He doesn’t have to any more than we are obliged to prove the existence of God. 🤷
 
First time to watch a video of this Richard Dawkins, find him nauseating to say the least.

Watched him at the end signing books, I’m assuming he’s laughing all the way to the bank, serves him well then to hold rallies to spout his unbelief message.

I have an atheist friend, who doesn’t spout his unbelief, in the end he can’t prove the non-existence of God.

One of his comical quotes is** " I’m an atheist thank God "** 🤷

Praying for Richard Dawkins might be the better option, and leave him to God…
Even Richard Dawkins admits that he is rather a sort of partial agnostic, claiming that there is no way to know for certain whether or not God actually exists. He chooses to believe that God doesn’t, but cannot prove it one way or the other.
 
Even Richard Dawkins admits that he is rather a sort of partial agnostic, claiming that there is no way to know for certain whether or not God actually exists. He chooses to believe that God doesn’t, but cannot prove it one way or the other.
Sounds like a classic agnostic to me.
 
Richard Dawkins put the words “modal logic” in scare-quotes when he was describing philosophers’ more recent concatenations of the Ontological Argument for the existence of God… What an unlettered bore.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top