Neither your quote, nor the link provided, sound like they represent the act. Section 1021 of the act, paraphrased, stated the following: only those whom planned, authorized, or aided, terrorist attacks of SEP 11th, 2001, or harbored those responsible for those attacks, and those whom were a part, or substantially supported Al-Qaeda, and / or The Taliban, and / or associated forces, that currently engage in hostile attacks against The U.S. and / or its coalition partners – inclusive of any person whom, belligerantly, acted to support, aid, such enemy hostilities – may be detained, (Let’s say, as a prisoner of war.), without trial, until, the end of hostilities authorized by The Authorization for Military Force. Such detention must be done in accord, with Public Law 107 – 40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note. It is not a matter of what “will”, must, be done, but what “may”, possibly, be done to include others as well in such circumstances, as a person already in trial, and the transfer of such person(s), to different legal auhtorities, courts or tribunals, in addition to another country, for custody. To be clear, I emphasize – nothing in this section, shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of The United States, or any other persons captured or arrested in The United States. The Secretary of Defense must brief Congress, and detain such “covered persons”, as described in section 1021, pursuant to … . See section 1022. Neither a U.S. citizen, nor a resident alien of The U.S., may be detained under section 1022 on the basis of conduct in The U.S., emphatically, except to the extent granted by The U.S. Constitution.
To answer your question: no – I’m not concerned about it, but were I to have limited myself to the link, which you provided, then on the basis of what is stated in the article, I would say, the following: whatever concern a person may possess about the matter, would be due to the bastardization of Pro-Life into a single issue, and shamefully so.