T
tomarin
Guest
Sorry, I don’t know the answer to that.
Of course Trump is worse on the environment than other presidents. His administration has weakened fuel efficiency standards for cars and trucks and has tried to strip California of the authority to set it’s own standards. More than 20 states have filed suit against the Trump administration over this roll back of tougher efficiency standards. And the Trump administration is set to soon open the National Arctic Wildlife Refuge in Alaska to oil drilling. And they’ve reduced the size of a number of national monuments. The list goes on…PaulinVA:![]()
Usually you do make meaningful posts. But here you are going off the rails making emotional accusations. Trump is no worse on the environment than previous presidents.@qui_est_ce , I’ve read your two posts above and don’t really want to get into a “OH, Yeah, well…” argument with you. I was attempting to have a meaningful discussion.
Believe me, there’s plenty to criticize Trump with, but what you posted is not.
Retracting the ridiculous Obama standards is a step towards rationality, not a step back.Of course Trump is worse on the environment than other presidents. His administration has weakened fuel efficiency standards for cars and trucks and has tried to strip California of the authority to set it’s own standards.
What’s wrong with a fuel efficiency goal of 55 mpg? It was a goal to be reached by 2025. Are you saying that the US isn’t innovative enough to build cars with that kind of fuel efficiency within the next 25 years?Thorolfr:![]()
Retracting the ridiculous Obama standards is a step towards rationality, not a step back.Of course Trump is worse on the environment than other presidents. His administration has weakened fuel efficiency standards for cars and trucks and has tried to strip California of the authority to set it’s own standards.
Obama’s goal of 55 mpg was a joke.
AND fuel standards are still increasing, just not as fast. They are not getting worse/lower.
If pollution is a problem where you are, possibly your choice of places to live isn’t ideal.His administration has weakened fuel efficiency standards for cars and trucks
The FBI conducts investigations. It’s in their name.Would that be similar to banana Democrats don’t care whether the Obama administration weaponized the CIA and the FBI along with the DNC to purchase foreign national intervention in an election where they spied on the opposing parties candidates?
Once again, investigations. Investigations. You know, to find all the Trump associates who have been convicted or pled guilty in the past 3 years.Where the banana Democrats don’t care about where laws were broken, evidence manipulated and forged to obtain illegal fisa warrants against American citizens in order to spy on a candidate and then an elected president?
Unlike the President’s own people who have leaked information? Sure seems like an awful lot of people have an awful lot of damaging information.Where government agents of the FBI and CIA illegally leaked material to the press in order to damage a sitting president?
You do know it was Trump asking for the test, right?Oh yeah, I forgot how much Dems love their drugs. Asking to be tested is considered a mortal sin for those guys.
Please provide the link to the failed test results. We all apparently know it but, uhm, I don’t.By the way, any update as to when Biden is releasing his cognitive test results? I mean, we all know he failed, so he might as well just get it over with hahaha.
Translated: “Let 'em eat cake.”If pollution is a problem where you are, possibly your choice of places to live isn’t ideal.
Nice deflection.Everything is class warfare with you Democrats.
I’m a California native and don’t really want to move. But I just saw this in the New York Times last week:If pollution is a problem where you are, possibly your choice of places to live isn’t ideal.
I think that’s good news for the environment and it looks like Mr. Trump is losing this fight.California on Monday finalized a legal settlement with five of the world’s largest automakers that binds them to comply with its stringent state-level fuel efficiency standards that would cut down on climate-warming tailpipe emissions.
Monday’s agreement adds legal teeth to a deal that California and four of the companies outlined in principle last summer, and it comes as a rejection of President Trump’s new, looser federal rules on fuel economy, which would allow more pollution into the atmosphere.
Mr. Trump was blindsided last summer when the companies — Ford, Honda, BMW and Volkswagen — announced that they had reached a secret deal with California to comply with that state’s standards, even as the Trump administration was working to roll back Obama-era rules on fuel economy. A fifth company, Volvo, said in March that it intended to join the agreement and is part of the legal settlement that was finalized on Monday.
If Biden has dementia, an amphetamine wouldn’t improve his cognitive abilities during a debate. If taken late in the day, an amphetamine might keep someone awake all night which is no doubt why some students take them when they’re cramming for an exam. And doctors prescribe amphetamines to patients with narcolepsy and with ADHD. But unless Biden has one of those medical conditions or has to cram for the debate, I don’t know how an amphetamine would help him.PaulinVA:![]()
Joe will be high, probably on amphetamine of some sort. No doubt about it.Crazy. Just bonkers.
What drugs would he test for? Adderall?
While what I have to say may be difficult for some to hear, I am saying it because I’m not just pro-life, I’m pro-eternal life and I want all of us to end up in heaven someday together."