J
Jedinovice
Guest
I am aware we have crossed swords on this before. I am not going to engage in further discussion with you on this topic as there is no way we will ever agree, I can see that.We’ve had this conversation before and I would suggest that the whole ‘persecution’ thing is hyperbole - hyperbole which is an ‘victimist’ insult to all those who have been persecuted, including your Christian martyrs and all those who were targets of the Stasi State you talk about (the Stasi were equal opportunity nasties, by the way, it wasn’t just Christians).
You didn’t answer the question about whether gays (who have been discriminated against for centuries) would be taken to an Employment Tribunal if they refuse to employ Christians (who haven’t).
I suspect this thread will be closed pretty quickly too! However, in a vague attempt to put back on track vaguely, the reason this case is important NOT frivolous is it a test case for how much religous expression is allowed in this country at all. The UK is socially and legally making it pretty clear “You can believe what you like in your own home but walk out the door and you leave your faith on the doorstep.” The subject may be just a ring but the precedent drives to the core of religious expression. The question being asked (by subtext) is “Can religious belief, particularly religous MORALITY be expressed in schools.” GIven recent comments from Alan Johnston - education secretary - the odds are ‘No.’
This case will help establish whether a person has the right to express their faith IN TERMS OF MORAL LIVING in education.
Only a court case which appeals to European law could establish that there is room for such expression. It’s a very important test case. There will be a lot of them.