“Some.” Even a blind sow gets an acorn. Some of her philosophy mirrors subsidiarity, but sh is completely devoid of solidarity.
I am in no position to judge your catholicity, but social Darwinism vis-a-vis Ayn Rand is as incompatible with Church teaching as Marxism.I am a social darwinist as well. I guess by your judgement, I am a bad Catholic.
The only time there has been relative peace in the Holy Land has been when a brutal repressive government has ruled the entire area.
Correct. He is a proud Republican! …er…well, no, he actually has nothing good to say about the Republican Party…but, he is running as a Republican.Dr. Paul is not third party.
Asa registered member of the California Libertarian Party, I’d be quite happy to vote for him:tiphat:
Sure. I would expect Libertarians to vote for him in the Republican Primary.
Romney called the ‘centrist,’’ ‘moderate’’ now who was seen along with Mike Huckabee in 2008 as the conservative alternative to John McCain, yet holds the same positions now.Romneys the moderate, someone should let them know.
They are three of eleven that endorsed Hillary five years ago, now they endorse Dr. Paul.
Would you have said the same if Santorum was out of the race and they endorse Romney?
Who at the time was so pro choice he vowed to fight for a woman’s right to kill her child.
No. They aren’t. Romney is more conservative than McCain. On immigration, I wish they held the same view, but Romney is far right.
Go to YouTube and type in liberal Mitts greatest hits, if that man is conservative and he gets the nomination, then the Republican party is a lot further gone than I thought they were.
I do consider stances now versus stances he took previously. Why wouldn’t I? Is everyone who changes stances a liar?
Reagon used to be pro choice before becoming pro life. Romney’s record on pro life issues was far better in office than Reagon’s was before he became president, yet Reagon is held up as a conservative icon. A group of pro life activists from Massachusetts have written a letter saying Romney is sufficiently pro life.
Changing a stance, fine, but the mans been all over the map. If that doesn’t scream pandering politician saying whatever it takes to get elected.
Ron Paul doesn’t consider Reagan a conservative icon, so I’m guessing his supporters don’t either.
Thank you for your opinion and/or campaign rhetoric. :tiphat:
Ok, now go watch that video at YouTube and explain all of his other “conservative” positions. What will he say behind closed doors? You’ve got one issue, abortion, I’ll accept his sincerety for that until you start showing how liberal you are every where else.
Well, you are supporting Ron Paul, aren’t you?
People can change their positions on issues with new insight and experience.
It is clear that the earth experiences natural cycles in temperature. However, science shows that human activity probably does play a role in stimulating the current fluctuations.The greatest hoax I think that has been around for many, many years if not hundreds of years has been this hoax on ...] global warming.”
It might turn out to be one of the biggest hoaxes of all history, this whole global warming terrorism that they’ve been using, but we’ll have to just wait and see, but it cannot be helpful.He is the only way out of the twilight zone, folks like Romney got me here.Well, you are supporting Ron Paul, aren’t you?