Roy Moore's Accuser Count is now up to 9

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoshuaIsLord
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe get off you high and might throne long enough to look at this situation with a clearer eye.If in fact RM IS guilty of some or all allegations,these occurred well over forty years ago.There is no indications he has sought out young women since thT time.Ever here of conversion. So glad you won’t be my judge when I leave this world.Apparently you have led a prisine life and have appointed yourself judge and jury!
 
I spoke about my friend who was raped by a 34 year old 35 years ago.

If that was the only 14 year old he raped, would he be a good candidate for congress if he claims to be prolife?
 
Hillary on the other hand is evil. So is Bill and Weinstein, and Franken.

How many posts do you have condemning them?
 
TMC said:
He does not follow a “constitutional originality view”. His view is that the only people who are entitled to freedom of religion are those that share his religious beliefs. That is not what the founders believed.
Click to expand...
That is your opinion…have you asked him?
I would suggest most of his voters think otherwise.
 
Nah,I haven’t commented on Al Franken much or even Bill for that matter but Hillary yeah thank God she isn’t our president
 
Last edited:
Jeanne_S said:
Maybe get off you high and might throne long enough to look at this situation with a clearer eye.If in fact RM IS guilty of some or all allegations,these occurred well over forty years ago.There is no indications he has sought out young women since thT time.Ever here of conversion. So glad you won’t be my judge when I leave this world.Apparently you have led a prisine life and have appointed yourself judge and jury!
Click to expand...
So, it’s ok to vote for a child molester because it happened a long time ago. Never mind the psychological effects on the victims that affects them for their entire lives. The excuses some will post here as justification for their support of Moore is truly verbal gymnastics worthy of an Olympic event.
 
Then why did even the President make a big deal by backing his opponent in the primary, given that both candidates are considered prolfe?

Of course now that Trump fears another negative vote in the Senate…
 
IMO voters should ask themselves is the candidate worthy of holding an office whereby he has a vote on rules of conduct for the whole country, among other things.
 
Jig_Saw:

.
So, it’s ok to vote for a child molester because it happened a long time ago. Never mind the psychological effects on the victims that affects them for their entire lives.
Click to expand...
.
I don’t think ANYBODY HERE thinks that Jig_Saw.

But SOME people here think that we need more evidence than some 40-year old “he-said, she saids”.

ESPECIALLY when other things come out.

Other things like the forged Roy Moore signature and date now being admitted.

And the media circus associated with the yearbook accusations BEFORE some forgery against Moore was admitted.

That (at least part of this yearbook) against Moore, was a forgery hurt the credibility of the claims as a whole.

It didn’t help the liberals about “forgetting” to mention about Judge Moore, convicting a relative of one of the accusers. It looks like an orchestrated political effort. I’m not saying that it is. I’m just saying it looks bad.

It also hurts the liberals attacking Moore, when they act like they are concerned about child abuse, but have no issues and even SUPPORT (in some cases) abortion against girls and killing their babies.

People look at that and conclude these are more “crocodile tears” from liberals.

I’m not saying these things. But I am observing what the people as a whole are saying and NOT saying.

It’s clear that Judge Moore, back in his days as a Democrat has drawn accusations against him that are at least worthy of considering, especially if there was some real evidence that get beyond he-said, she-saids.

But NOBODY here thinks child molestation is OK (unless you include pro-aborts supporting abortion for girls, and ignoring the NEED for DNA investigations on ALL minor girls who have been victimized by men impregnating them. Where is the call from “liberalville” for such investigations?)

And WHEN people see such calls from liberals, and liberals putting forth pro-life candidates, these types of complaints will be taken more seriously by some of the more conservatively minded voters.

Again. I take it seriously now.

But many others don’t because liberals keep trying to use these types of things to fool voters into voting for MORE liberals… . . And that method of manipulation doesn’t seem to be working any more. And liberals don’t know what to do about it.

Which is WHY Judge Moore will probably win his election, despite the accusations (of what may or may not have occurred) concerning Judge Moore’s susepct days when Moore was a Democrat.
 
Last edited:
Cathoholic said:
But SOME people here think that we need more evidence than some 40-year old “he-said, she saids”.
Click to expand...
Well, it’s really “he said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she side”, so let’s call it what it is.
Cathoholic said:
ESPECIALLY when other things come out.

Other things like the forged Roy Moore signature and date now being admitted.
Click to expand...
Except it has not been proven that it is forged, has it?
Cathoholic said:
That (at least part of this yearbook) against Moore, was a forgery hurt the credibility of the claims as a whole.
Click to expand...
Really, the yearbook claim hurts the credibility claims of the 8 other accusers. Pray tell, how exactly?
Cathoholic said:
It didn’t help the liberals about “forgetting” to mention about Judge Moore, convicting a relative of one of the accusers. It looks like an orchestrated political effort. I’m not saying that it is. I’m just saying it looks bad.
Click to expand...
There are 9 accusers. Backed up by others that said that the accusers told them about Moore before the accusations came out. And then Moore’s excuses “I always asked for their mother’s permission to date” and “I don’t know them” - the latter is clearly a lie. But let’s focus on one accuser.
Cathoholic said:
It also hurts the liberals attacking Moore, when they act like they are concerned about child abuse, but have no issues and even SUPPORT (in some cases) abortion against girls and killing their babies.
Click to expand...
Yep, how dare anyone be against child abuse if they don’t share your view on abortion.
Cathoholic said:
It’s clear that Judge Moore, back in his days as a Democrat has drawn accusations against him that are at least worthy of considering, especially if there was some real evidence that get beyond he-said, she-saids.
Click to expand...
There is the evidence of him lying and you are choosing to ignore that.
Cathoholic said:
But NOBODY here thinks child molestation is OK (unless you include pro-aborts supporting abortion for girls, and ignoring the NEED for DNA investigations on ALL minor girls who have been victimized by men impregnating them. Where is the call from “liberalville” for such investigations?)
Click to expand...
Wow, you can’t really stick to a single topic. I had to read that three times to get the gist of what you were getting at. So, it’s good that you don’t think child molestation is ok, but you just want to ignore the accusations against Moore because you like his stance on abortion.
Cathoholic said:
And WHEN people see such calls from liberals, and liberals putting forth pro-life candidates, these types of complaints will be taken more seriously by some of the more conservatively minded voters.
Click to expand...
Again, because someone can’t be against child sexual abuse unless they happen to agree with your stance on abortion.
 
Cathoholic said:
Again. I take it seriously now.
Click to expand...
Sure doesn’t seem like it.
Cathoholic said:
But many others don’t because liberals keep trying to use these types of things to fool voters into voting for MORE liberals… . . And that method of manipulation doesn’t seem to be working any more. And liberals don’t know what to do about it.
Click to expand...
I think many liberals accept that a lot of pro-family talk is just lip service by Republicans to give an excuse for those that claim to be religious to vote Republican.
Cathoholic said:
Which is WHY Judge Moore will probably win his election, despite the accusations (of what may or may not have occurred) concerning Judge Moore’s susepct days when Moore was a Democrat.
Click to expand...
I’m pretty sure being a Democrat isn’t what made him a pedophile.
 
Jig_Saw:

.
how dare anyone be against child abuse if they don’t share your view on abortion.
Click to expand...
.
Abortion IS a form of child abuse Jig_Saw.

It is abusive against the innocent child you are killing.

And it IS ALSO abusive against the girls . . . who society is “giving” abortions to.

Certainly you would agree with that right Jig_Saw?
 
Last edited:
Jig_Saw:

.
you just want to ignore the accusations against Moore
Click to expand...
.

This is not true.

To the readers of the thread look at what I have wrote.

I wrote that the accusations against Moore were "“worthy of considering”.
. . . that are at least worthy of considering . . .
Click to expand...
Jig_Saw is just going to have to let himself (her?) be “triggered” that I also observe the defense against Moore’s accusations are likewise worthy of considering.

And Jig_Saw will just have to keep inventing mythical points I allegedly made and continue to attack this invented straw man of his.
 
Last edited:
Jig_Saw:

.
Well, it’s really “he said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she side”, so let’s call it what it is.
Click to expand...
.

Yeah. Like the 59 million “he said and she saids” that are much MORE than allegations against Doug Jones ideas.

http://www.christianliferesources.com/article/u-s-abortion-statistics-by-year-1973-current-1042

.
"To be clear, I fully support a woman’s freedom to choose to what happens to her own body. . . .-- Doug Jones
Click to expand...

Doug Jones speaks on abortion issue, wants 'to be clear' on where he stands

Jones faces Republican Roy Moore in the Dec. 12 Senate election.
www.al.com www.al.com
 
Last edited:
The word “forged” is not accurate. She made a note following his yearbook entry.

It isn’t he said she said. It’s nine women with similar stories, who don’t know each other. Each of these women told people over the years.

Abortion is horrible. So is the sexual abuse of a child. Who are we to say that these women don’t matter?

For what? So this guy will magically be the vote to end abortion?

Forget the damage.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top