E
estesbob
Guest
And what point was that?:thumbsup:Well said, straight and to the point.
And what point was that?:thumbsup:Well said, straight and to the point.
I agree with what you’re saying, Ed, but I don’t think the way to fight fire (i.e. “repressive intolerance towards those who do not embrace homosexuality and the homosexual life-style”) is with fire (i.e. “forced medical procedures” - for what, I wonder?). Rather, the way to fight fire is with the truth of the Gospel and with good philosophy and, frankly, standing up to be counted.Unless enacted into law, it’s not horrific since the Russians are watching the United and seeing the President of the most powerful country on earth, other politicians, heads of major US corporations, 5 year olds in schools, Gay Pride Month with 9 year old girls, and other politicians and lawmakers passing gay so-called marriage laws. And Western Europe?
I think Russian politicians are responding to a global infiltration of all institutions that demands and forces others not to just respect gay/LGBT people who will stop campaigning and live like everybody else after they get a “marriage” license, but no. They are watching a tidal wave of events driven by gay activists to force others to accept gay behavior as normative, at every institution, regardless of age, and parents cannot opt out their kids and raise them the way they want, and they are the ones horrified.
They missed the protests in France?
bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-22833798
Ed
The Russians are disabling the gay propaganda machine in their country. You can’t get arrested for being gay but I still don’t know, except from an opinion poll, where you got this idea that the government would force medical procedures on gay people.I agree with what you’re saying, Ed, but I don’t think the way to fight fire (i.e. “repressive intolerance towards those who do not embrace homosexuality and the homosexual life-style”) is with fire (i.e. “forced medical procedures” - for what, I wonder?). Rather, the way to fight fire is with the truth of the Gospel and with good philosophy and, frankly, standing up to be counted.
Hey Ed, again I don’t disagree with what you’re saying, just sounding a note of caution against extremity one way or the other.The Russians are disabling the gay propaganda machine in their country. You can’t get arrested for being gay but I still don’t know, except from an opinion poll, where you got this idea that the government would force medical procedures on gay people.
Good philosophy? It’s sorely missing in the US at all levels, The only philosophy being taught is gay marriage is OK. The Russians have put a full stop to the the propaganda in their country because they are watching its effects in the United States, Canada and Western Europe. They have every reason to be alarmed. There is no fight fire with fire. The Russians are using the propaganda containment approach. There are gay people in Russia but they are seeing the accelerated force and pressure being put on governments right now. This was an appropriate response.
Yes, the truth of the Gospel for gay and straight is to avoid all sexual immorality and I submit gay marriage is a form of immorality. This I follow with - NOBODY NEEDS ANYBODY’S PERMISSION TO LIVE HOW THEY WANT. I don’t need 24/7 gay propaganda in my face.
Ed
Apparently, it is Russian politicians - not an opinion poll - who are suggesting “forced medical treatment” for homosexuals. This doesn’t surprise me. While I agree with their strong stance against homosexual propaganda, I honestly don’t think the policies will be carried out democratically or justly, knowing Russia’s recent history (i.e. the last hundred years+). Perhaps if these policies were being brought forward by governments in Australia, the UK, Netherlands, Germany or other countries, I’d be a little more at ease.Lawmakers have accused gays of decreasing Russia’s already low birth rates and said they should be barred from government jobs, undergo forced medical treatment or be exiled.
Yes, the “article states” and you repeat but nowhere in any reading of the bill is there a reference to “forced medical procedures.” We have kooky politicians in the US, too. But just because some politico says something when commenting on proposed legislation, doesn’t mean that a) it will ever make it into the legislation or b) that it’s true.The article states:
Apparently, it is Russian politicians - not an opinion poll - who are suggesting “forced medical treatment” for homosexuals. This doesn’t surprise me. While I agree with their strong stance against homosexual propaganda, I honestly don’t think the policies will be carried out democratically or justly, knowing Russia’s recent history (i.e. the last hundred years+).
Wait… You support banning the free expression of speech and the right to assemble if it isn’t in keeping with your beliefs??? I’m pretty sure I just read a comment from you on another thread talking about how you were sad that our American system is “broken”. Isn’t the first amendment the most important of our national beliefs?I fully support banning homosexual propaganda and “gay pride” rallies/parades. However, I do wish that the Russian Orthodox who are being violent towards the would stop. All people are created in the image of God and that includes members of the “LGBT” community. They need to be shown compassion. Perhaps if more Christians would show compassion to them then more of them would see the light of Christ and convert to the Catholic Church.
Limited free speech rights for Christians are already on their way.May be am a horrible Catholic Christian gut I believe in freedom of speech and freedom of Assembly. We applaud to see these rights limited to LGBT lobby but would be shocked and angry if the US legislature limited these rights for Catholics.
Of course, Corki. But then it could be true and coming from Russian politicians, it wouldn’t surprise me. Putin’s no saint.Yes, the “article states” and you repeat but nowhere in any reading of the bill is there a reference to “forced medical procedures.” We have kooky politicians in the US, too. But just because some politico says something when commenting on proposed legislation, doesn’t mean that a) it will ever make it into the legislation or b) that it’s true.