E
estesbob
Guest
Absolutely disgusting.So I assume President Putin will not have 3rd graders introducing him in honor of Pride Week.
breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2013/06/13/Third-Graders-Introduce-Obama-at-LGBT-Pride-Event
Absolutely disgusting.So I assume President Putin will not have 3rd graders introducing him in honor of Pride Week.
breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2013/06/13/Third-Graders-Introduce-Obama-at-LGBT-Pride-Event
Well the administration that holds leadership in our country supports the liquidation of 400,000 black children a year. so you might have a point.Because only crazy people would even state that they would desire the “liquidation” of a group of people.
Would they actually “follow through” if given the chance- hard to say.
Still to even hold that idea makes someone a bit unhinged and frightening in my book.
Would you be cool with it if the government officially declared a month to be White History Month or White Pride Month? Keep in mind that in the USA whites are quickly becoming a minority, and blacks now have a black POTUS who was elected twice. Also know that I’m of African American descent.So . . . uh Ed. . . . What about Black History Month. . . you cool with that?
Do you have a reference for this ‘forced medical procedures’ being in the bill? I follow the gay press and recall no mention of it. And please don’t play the Muslim card since other religions have had their say regarding this topic as well.While I commend the integrity of those in the Duma and the better qualities of the bill, from what the article says, it does some rather extreme and some of it downright nasty (e.g. forced medical procedures!).
I can definitely understand Russia’s fear of “Western liberalism” - it’s the same fear many Muslims have too - since such “liberalism” seems to equate to pornography, licentiousness, promotion of same-sex anything, drug-taking, breakdown of marriages…the list goes on. And again, I commend their stance against it, but we all need to be careful not to go to the opposite extreme and begin harassing people unjustly.
9 year olds and gay pride go together like… like… Get em while they’re young so they’ll imagine all this stuff as normative when they get to voting age.So I assume President Putin will not have 3rd graders introducing him in honor of Pride Week.
breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2013/06/13/Third-Graders-Introduce-Obama-at-LGBT-Pride-Event
false notion? You mean the obvious notion?Will this stop that false notion of which country needs to be consecrated to the Immaculate Heart now?
Well, first of all- there is no such thing as “white”, except that “whiteness” is an absence of minority status as legally attributed in various ways through US history.Would you be cool with it if the government officially declared a month to be White History Month or White Pride Month? Keep in mind that in the USA whites are quickly becoming a minority, and blacks now have a black POTUS who was elected twice. Also know that I’m of African American descent.
Where is your evidence that “1 in 20” people in the U.S. “desire the liquidation” of homosexuals?Because only crazy people would even state that they would desire the “liquidation” of a group of people.
Would they actually “follow through” if given the chance- hard to say.
Still to even hold that idea makes someone a bit unhinged and frightening in my book.
Hi Ed, I don’t know if it is specified in the bill, I was referring to the article about that part, where it states:Do you have a reference for this ‘forced medical procedures’ being in the bill? I follow the gay press and recall no mention of it. And please don’t play the Muslim card since other religions have had their say regarding this topic as well.
Ed
If this is true, it’s pretty horrific.Lawmakers have accused gays of decreasing Russia’s already low birth rates and said they should be barred from government jobs, undergo forced medical treatment or be exiled.
I “imagine” then Elizabeth.Where is your evidence that “1 in 20” people in the U.S. “desire the liquidation” of homosexuals?
Not your imagination, your evidence. You said you imagined it, right?
Look at your post 67. Actually read it, and stop dodging.
It is worth noting that this amendment is so vague according to experts that single fathers and moms raising children are also at risk of having their children forcefully removed from their care under false allegations.“There are children who are raised by same-sex couples and a legal amendment to our “Prohibition of non-traditional sexual relationships among minors” law is being considered so as to make it possible for social services to take these children away on the grounds of being exposed to same-sex cohabitation.”
maybe the Russian Orthodox are also planning a crackdown on the RCs and the incident that prompted this bill was a pretext.The State Duma passed another bill on Tuesday that makes offending religious feelings a crime punishable by up to three years in prison.
We had so called morals laws in the USA for decades and decades with no fascism. The unprincipled do not like them because it limits license.also from the lead article…
maybe the Russian Orthodox are also planning a crackdown on the RCs and the incident that prompted this bill was a pretext.
the giddy people applauding these morality laws never, and I mean never, consider that the cure is worse than the disease.
It’s not in the bill.Hi Ed, I don’t know if it is specified in the bill, I was referring to the article about that part, where it states:
If this is true, it’s pretty horrific.
and the principled don’t like them for even better reasons.We had so called morals laws in the USA for decades and decades with no fascism. The unprincipled do not like them because it limits license.
Why intentionally mix just and unjust laws?and the principled don’t like them for even better reasons.
e.g., among the “morals laws” were anti-miscegenation statutes, laws against Catholic parochial schools, etc. and those are the ones that are just plain ugly on their face.
Where are those in this billand the principled don’t like them for even better reasons.
e.g., among the “morals laws” were anti-miscegenation statutes, laws against Catholic parochial schools, etc. and those are the ones that are just plain ugly on their face.
Q: why assume every morals law is just?Why intentionally mix just and unjust laws?
We had so called morals laws in the USA for decades and decades with no fascism. The unprincipled do not like them because it limits license.