S.F. Catholic Church priest bans girls as altar servers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maxirad
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
What positions in the Church/parish are they being shut out?
The OP is about altar servers.
Do you agree with the Catholic Church’s position that only men can be Priests?
As I said to another poster earlier, first, please explain how my response to this question has any bearing on the discussion issue.
Bolding mine. Are you a psychologist? Have you examined him?
You don’t have to be a squirrel to recognize a nut. 😃
 
The good news, however, is that 'call to action was noted as greying about 15 years ago, and about the only thing that has changed is that they are dying, and the younger generation is not joining up with them. Time will eventually solve the matter.
True, the good news is that the organization with the name Call to Action (Call to Fraction, as my son calls it) is greying. I’m struck by that fact every time I see a picture of their conferences.

Time will not solve the matter, however, because the bad news is that Call to Action is just one of the better known dissident groups which undoubtedly have a problem with all male alter servers. A few of the other dissident groups are Dignity, the Association for the Rights of Catholics in the Church, RAPPORT, Plax Christi, Catholics for Choice, various “social justice” organizations, groups against clerical celibacy, and groups such as Roman Catholic Women priests, the Women’s Ordination Conference and the Women-Church Convergence. Not to mention the organizations of dissident sisters, many of whom favor abortion, priestesses, homosexuality, contraception, Socialism, etc. Also, termites in the clerical ranks can’t be left out of the picture.

Satan doesn’t sleep, as the Holy Father has reminded us more I think than any previous Pope in my lifetime.
 
There are an ample number of people who by their statements show more than you seem willing to admit. I did not direct the comment to you, and if you take umbrage with it, then I have to ask why you presume to paint all people with one brush - because I don’t.

I was born in the 40’s, and I am well aware not only of the positive values of the Church pre-Vatican 2, but also aware of problems that existed then. I am also aware of problems that exist now. I have come across enough people who have expressed that pre Vatican 2 was the height of the Church and that it has descended since then to know that their grasp of pre Vatican 2 is through rose colored glasses.
I have read testimonies of those who having experienced both pre V2 and after (I happen to be one of them, too) who found beauty in the liturgy and a reverence not present in some parishes today. That some are now imbalanced with a stronger slant toward the horizontal is fact. Our individual experience of worship is a personal thing and an integral part of our relationship to God. It is not romanticism - it is purely a communication between God and the soul alone.
 
How many will go on to be professed religious in orders which wear an identifiable habit?
Considering the dwindling numbers of female religious, I would guess the number is not far above zero.

The point is obvious, the Church itself makes it clear that altar serving has always been seen as a mean to encourage vocations to the Priesthood–not to female religious orders. There will never be a female who becomes a Priest.
 
This thread makes me so sad. WWJD? If there was a girl who said to Jesus, “You are my savior and I would be humbled to serve for you at mass”, do you really think Jesus would turn her away simply because she was a female?
Well He did only select men to be His apostles so it’s quite possible. I wouldn’t call it ‘turning away’ Perhaps He would have suggested another ministry. I know of a parish that has a ministry called Guild of Our Lady for girls and they lead the prayers after Mass.
 
I have read testimonies of those who having experienced both pre V2 and after (I happen to be one of them, too) who found beauty in the liturgy and a reverence not present in some parishes today. That some are now imbalanced with a stronger slant toward the horizontal is fact. Our individual experience of worship is a personal thing and an integral part of our relationship to God. It is not romanticism - it is purely a communication between God and the soul alone.
Well said. Our communication with God is not romanticism.

As an aside, I’ll mention that we have a parish up in my neck of the woods called “Our Lady Star of the Sea.” It, too, has only boy altar servers. The priest there offers a very reverent OF, as well as an EF once a month (I’ve attended both). It also has about 1250 registered families; a very large and vibrant parish. Granted, it’s in a conservative area, which San Francisco isn’t, but it’s Fr. Illo’s hope that the changes will bring more parishioners, since Our Lady Star of the Sea in San Fran was dying when he arrived. I mean, it had altar girls, but it was still dying. When the general Catholic population realizes that a very reverent OF, beautiful devotions, as well as the EF, are offered there, the numbers of parishioners may well increase. Father Illo also hopes to start devotion of the Blessed Sacrament. If I recall correctly, he said that this is not offered anywhere yet in the diocese. He said, too, that there’s a large empty convent on the parish grounds, and that he hopes to have an order of nuns one day there. He has big plans, and I wish him well.
 
It has been noted that there are dwindling numbers of women religious and this of course is a tragedy. The numbers have dwindled just as every single vocation has dwindled in the years since the Sexual Revolution gave us free love and the Pill. (Including and especially Matrimony).

The answers to that are clear: hard-identity Catholicism and a resurgence of the traditional roles of the sexes. While the aggregate number of women religious may be dwindling, the number of orthodox and faithful religious is blossoming. There are nuns in habits and sisters, also in habits, going about the work of the Lord in joyful and eager ways. The reason the old guard doesn’t get any vocations is because they have diluted identity and orthodoxy to the point of irrelevancy. Feminists who want to be just like men are a dime a dozen, and extremely boring, and do not present a draw to religious life. On the other hand, women who enjoy being women, and embrace the complementarity that God gave them, those are the kind of women who can draw faithful Catholics who desire to serve the Church in the consecrated life.

I think that just viewing this as an “altar girl ban” is unproductive. This pastor should be asking ways for girls and women to serve their parish and the Lord productively, as women should. I don’t doubt that he is doing so, but of course that aspect of formation will never get the MSM to sit up and take notice like an “unjust ban” would do. Just as Archbishop +Cordileone is not only fighting against homosexual “marriage”, he is also fighting in favor of traditional marriage, and catechizing the faithful about what marriage really means, and how it can be fruitful for one man and one woman, and how to welcome children into that relationship.

I assure you that all this can be done, but one of the necessary steps is taking back what rightfully belongs to males, reclaiming our territory, and reasserting the complementarity between the sexes. We have to tirelessly teach that we can be different but equal in dignity. We can be respectful but complementary. The Holy Father asked the Church for a “deeper theology of women”. I honestly think that has already been acheived, in the image of the Blessed Virgin Mary. How much deeper can we get than the Mother of God, who gave her humble fiat and embraced her role as a woman, and didn’t burn her bra in protest when she was not ordained a bishop. All women can look to the Theotokos, and likewise to all kinds of female saints through the ages, and find good role models.

This is the kind of service and humility that needs to be encouraged. It is counter-cultural - the world will tell you not to stop until men are under your thumb. At the same time the world will tell you that fertility and pregnancy are diseases to be treated and cured, and that good women contracept so that men can take advantage of them as objects. It’s wildly contradictory messages we get from society today. But some women persevere in holiness and achieve Heaven in spite of the pressure to compromise their biology and compromise their essential dignity. And that’s what we are all striving for, man and woman alike: dignity and respect, and above all, holiness.
 
The reason the old guard doesn’t get any vocations is because they have diluted identity and orthodoxy to the point of irrelevancy. Feminists who want to be just like men are a dime a dozen, and extremely boring, and do not present a draw to religious life. On the other hand, women who enjoy being women, and embrace the complementarity that God gave them, those are the kind of women who can draw faithful Catholics who desire to serve the Church in the consecrated life.
Well said.

This also shows the utter absurdity of changing doctrine and weaken pastoral discipline to “get with the times”.
 
Every once in a while it is necessary to bring a bit of reality to conversations. So let’s talk real world numbers, and see if it provides a little prospective.

Let’s go back to 1965; for the simple reason that anyone ordained in 1965 would not have started theology until 1961; would not have started college until 1957; and would not have started high school until 1953.

In other words, well before the chaos of post Vatican 2 (the “spirit” of Vatican 2) had taken hold; and clearly not at a time of girls serving at the altar.

In 1965, there were 17,637 parishes, and for the sake of the example, we will assume the same number back to 1953. Statistics may move some if there were fewer parishes, but not significantly. Statistics from CARA.

So how many ordinations were there in 1965?
  1. Also from CARA.
What does that mean? That means that the number of men ordained that year represent 1 boy making it all the way to ordination, out of about 18 parishes.

That is, for all the parishes (18) and all the boys in each parish who served as an altar boy for one or more years, only one boy doing so from that group would be ordained.

When boys would be trained for the position was up to the individual parish; in mine, you had to be a 6th grade student.

Just for giggles, let’s assume that in the 6th grade bracket in those parishes, there was an average of 7 boys being trained; I suspect an average closer to 10; that would be more likely; but with an average of 7, that would mean that out of 125 boys, one would be ordained.

Which is another way of saying that eight tenths of one percent of the boys serving would be ordained.

I really do not think that girls serving is going to move that percentage in any significant amount.

And before someone comes back and tells me how some conservative parish had X number of ordinations, all that would be said is that there is a culture within the parish that is different from what might be termed a liberal parish, and all of that has an impact on whether or not a boy somewhere along the line might consider a vocation to the priesthood.

There are a multitude of issues which can impact a boy in terms of any future vocation, and has been stated elsewhere, allegedly 20% of those ordained did not serve as altar boys. Can serving at the altar have an impact? Absolutely. But it is simply one piece in many pieces, and the presumption is that it is the greatest impact - with no evidence being offered other than that they were altar boys.

I really don’t think it makes all that much difference whether there are altar girls or not. My own observations are that family life has far more impact than serving; as well as a host of other issues.

Over the last 24 years, my parish has had three men ordained to the priesthood, 1 more who started seminary and did not complete; 2 permanent deacons, and one who started but did not complete; and one woman who joined an order of sisters which is growing, and which wears an identifiable habit. We have the OF only, but have had 24 hour Perpetual Adoration for most of that time. And all served Mass (including the sister), and all were somewhat delayed ordinations. And for all that time, both boys and girls serve.

We all have our opinions; some might even have more than one opinion on the matter. But factually, when prior to Vatican 2 one boy in something between every 15 to 18 parishes might be ordained, out of all the boys in his class age who served, it is more than a bit hard for me to believe that having girls also serve Mass really has anything to do with the number of vocations 14 or more years later.
 
I really do not think that girls serving is going to move that percentage in any significant amount.
And thankfully you are not in charge of a parish or Church discipline, and the Church has spoken clearly and decisively: There is a solid link between boys serving and vocations, and the esteemed practice of boys serving is to be retained.

Here’s some more information: when girls serve, boys are pushed out. They allow girls to take up the slack, or they view the ministry as effeminatized and refuse to do a girly thing like that. It’s a fact that when my parish went back to boys-only, the number of boys increased and exceeded the number of boys + girls.

So even if there is no link at all between serving and vocations, prohibiting girls has a positive effect on the number of boys serving, and for me, that is a good thing. More men need to get involved in their parish. Many start as altar boys. If an altar boy does not grow up to be a priest then perhaps he will grow up to be a Knight of Columbus, or an Opus Dei member, or a strong husband. Perhaps he will be the next Matthew Kelly or Jeff Cavins. It’s clear that boys should not be denied opportunities to serve, especially to serve at the altar.
 
I really don’t think it makes all that much difference whether there are altar girls or not. My own observations are that family life has far more impact than serving; as well as a host of other issues.
“In August 2010 some fifty thousand altar servers descended upon Rome for the International Pilgrimage of Altar Servers with Pope Benedict XVI. It was the tenth such gathering of “ministrants” who serve the Novus Ordo Missae, and it marked the first time that altar girls outnumbered altar boys at the event… For nearly twenty years — since the promulgation of Acta Apostolicae Sedis, a Vatican interpretation of canon 230.2 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law — girls have poured into church sanctuaries like a wall of water rushing downstream from a broken dam. Just as quickly, boys have moved out of the way…“Of course, it’s not fair to lay blame for the priest shortage on the alb-covered shoulders of altar girls, who, by and large, do an excellent job serving…So, then, why should there be any issue with altar girls?.. [Because] Traditionally, priests have come from the ranks of the altar-server corps, and the introduction of female servers would soon discourage and drive away boys called to the priesthood.
newoxfordreview.org/article.jsp?did=1111-skuba

otjm, your opinion as to whether female alter servers, or the homosexual travesty in our seminaries which screened out straight men, or Richard McBrien et al., or family life, was the major cause of the loss of vocations is interesting. But it’s no more valid than my opinion–which, I’d wager, is also the Vatican’s: a combination of the first two causes. I believe that it was the first two because the drop in vocations mirrored the drop in masculinity.
 
That’s a shame. Getting girls more involved in the church and the mass has been a great motivator for the girls in my parish to keep going to mass after confirmation. My daughter’s group continued to attend church all through high school and the ones who didn’t go away for college continued to attend mass. It was like they thought of themselves as stakeholders in the church. Serving can also be an awesome conduit into the sisterhood. Sisterhood is all about service. It’s a shame this priest is denying his young female parishioners this great faith building opportunity. But I’m sure that he has his reasons for only wanting boys to serve him.
 
I agree. Unless girls being alter servers have somehow impacted the number of boys into the priesthood, I do not think that denying these young female volunteers the right to serve is right whatsoever.
People think that serving is a primary route to the priesthood. While serving is certainly a faith building experience, it’s not the great deliverer of new priests people think. What percentage of servers eventually join the priesthood? 30%? 20%? 10%? I would suspect it’s less than 5%. That’s a pathetic return on investment. And the chance that excluding girls will make families upset is very real. Johnny can serve but his sister Janie can’t? Setting up just another reason for families to go lukewarm on the church. Recruitment into the priesthood must start with the families, not just the boys. Imagine the effect of a mom who encourages her son to go into the priesthood because it’s a noble job, worthy of love, gratitude and respect. Then imagine the mom who advises her son to stay away from the priesthood because it does not pay well, will prohibit him from starting a family and will require him to work wherever the order or diocese sends him. Regardless of the boy’s inclination toward the priesthood, regardless of his altar service experience, if you can’t sell the priesthood to his parents, it’s doubtful you’ll get the kid.
 
You’ve been doing so for a number of posts and you’ve just done it again.

I **never **said this. You’ve inserted the word “only” which changes my statement entirely.

Your conclusion is based on faulty assumptions.

Yes, it was fairly easy of you to connect some dots, unfortunately, the dots weren’t of **my **making, but of yours.
-“Ummm, perhaps you haven’t noticed, but all priests, and all those in the Church in any position of power—temporal or spiritual—are male. I know, sometimes it’s hard to spot, so don’t feel bad if you didn’t catch it…” which is your response to “I can’t see that women are shut out of positions in the Church. In my diocese, women do a lot of work…such as: conduct RCIA classes, choir directors, teach in the school, parish coordinators, among other things. Exactly what are they shut out of, other than serving at the altar when the priest doesn’t allow it?”

-“I never said that. In fact, I never spoke about the women you mentioned at all” which is your response to my comment- “So these women have no power within the Church?” with the women in the question being those mentioned in the above. Apparently you seem to have forgotten that you did speak about those women.

-"Let’s see, just off the top of my head: the power to celebrate Mass, perform the sacraments, have a say in the interpretation of doctrine, pick Popes… " which is your response to the question- “How do you define “position of power,” exactly?”

Yeah, pretty clear I’m not putting words into your mouth about you holding that clergy are the ones in power in the Church and that women don’t have any.

Well you can understand how I could come to the conclusion that you think women don’t have any power in the Church and that the only ones with power are the clergy given that you’ve claimed as much in your comments I quoted above. Maybe you were too busy name calling a Cardinal (Do I need to cite where you called Cardinal Burke a nut and claim he has psychological issues or do you remember writing that?) because you don’t like his views to remember what you’ve actually wrote in the rest of this thread.🤷
 
Regardless of the boy’s inclination toward the priesthood, regardless of his altar service experience, if you can’t sell the priesthood to his parents, it’s doubtful you’ll get the kid.
Utter nonsense. The Spirit moves with or without your permission.
 
People think that serving is a primary route to the priesthood. While serving is certainly a faith building experience, it’s not the great deliverer of new priests people think. What percentage of servers eventually join the priesthood? 30%? 20%? 10%? I would suspect it’s less than 5%. That’s a pathetic return on investment. And the chance that excluding girls will make families upset is very real. Johnny can serve but his sister Janie can’t? Setting up just another reason for families to go lukewarm on the church. Recruitment into the priesthood must start with the families, not just the boys. Imagine the effect of a mom who encourages her son to go into the priesthood because it’s a noble job, worthy of love, gratitude and respect. Then imagine the mom who advises her son to stay away from the priesthood because it does not pay well, will prohibit him from starting a family and will require him to work wherever the order or diocese sends him. Regardless of the boy’s inclination toward the priesthood, regardless of his altar service experience, if you can’t sell the priesthood to his parents, it’s doubtful you’ll get the kid.
I mostly agree with your underlying premise regarding correlation, but in terms of the “parents” question, more than half of our diocese’s priestly ordinands the last few years have been what were once called “late vocations” – they entered seminary after jobs in the business world. In such cases I don’t think the parental role is the same, at least in terms of “selling them.”
 
I mostly agree with your underlying premise regarding correlation, but in terms of the “parents” question, more than half of our diocese’s priestly ordinands the last few years have been what were once called “late vocations” – they entered seminary after jobs in the business world. In such cases I don’t think the parental role is the same, at least in terms of “selling them.”
Point taken. I was just responding to the idea that we need to bolster the boy server to priest route at the expense of girls and without consideration of family influence. Late vocations and conversions are certainly routes as well.
 
Point taken. I was just responding to the idea that we need to bolster the boy server to priest route at the expense of girls and without consideration of family influence. Late vocations and conversions are certainly routes as well.
Strawman: who has said we shouldn’t consider family influences?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top