M
mgrfin
Guest
That seems like today’s contradiction.In Chapter III of Pastor Aeternus, Vatican I reiterates infallible dogmas that the Magisterium must be followed even when it doesn’t act infallibly."?
peace
That seems like today’s contradiction.In Chapter III of Pastor Aeternus, Vatican I reiterates infallible dogmas that the Magisterium must be followed even when it doesn’t act infallibly."?
If I know my conscience is in error I can’t follow it.mgrfin, you have a degree in theology, right? It seems to me your idea of following one’s conscience is distorted.
If your conscience is in error do you have the divine right to follow it?
Apparently, a cricket knows more than you.So, if my conscience is telling me I need to murder my friend, I should follow it?
No, that sets the Catholic people in a tizzy.
Ah yes, Jimmy Cricket, the infallible judge of truth…
Believe it or not, there are people who do not accept Peter.lets go back to the basics. ccc 153 When Peter confessed that Jesus if the Christ, the son of the living God, Jesus declared to him that this revelation did not come from flesh and blood, but from my father in heaven. Faith is a gift of GOD A SUPERNATURAL VIRTUE INFUSED BY HIM. Before this faith can be exercised man must have the grace of GOD to MOVE and ASSIST him. he must have the INTERIOR helps of the HOLY SPIRIT who moves the heart and converts it to GOD. WHO opens the MIND and makes it EASY for ALL to accept and BELIEVE THE TRUTH. that is why Jesus left the Church to Peter, We can argue all year until that grace comes to a person they will never understand. Thats all i can say
Oh, “Chill out, Joseph” - for a moment there I thought you were talking to me. Fortunately my name is not Joseph. And, I never supported Senator McCarthy.. Chill out, Joseph.
No I don’t level sarcasm cloaked in loving words at my family.Do you do that with yours?He can go hug a tree if he must joke sarcastically about hugging.
Do you catharina --talk to your family that way. A pot should not be looking around – finding ways to call another black.
These obvious sect-cult people imagine they know everything; then as a group they attack. How much prudence, justice, fortitude and temporance guide such lives?Oh, “Chill out, Joseph” - for a moment there I thought you were talking to me. Fortunately my name is not Joseph. And, I never supported Senator McCarthy.
peace
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walking_Home
Do you catharina --talk to your family that way. A pot should not be looking around – finding ways to call another black.
No I don’t level sarcasm cloaked in loving words at my family.Do you do that with yours?He can go hug a tree if he must joke sarcastically about hugging.
Quote=catharina
Why the sarcasm? You talk to your family that way? It’s getting really disgusting.
Quote=catharina
EXCUSE ME? ~ Does someone need a hug? ~ That’s serious and not disingenuous? Go find a mirror. Gaze and reflect.
This so hits the nail on the head. Check out post 965.Your McCarthy-like tendencies are appalling. You see Feeneyites, Sedevacantists, and “Lefebrvrites” (whatever that is) all around you, when only a couple people have implied, let alone stated that they hold to such views. I’ve seen you do this countless times, even to me. Chill out, Joseph.
You were NOT involved in this exchange so I guess you fit your own description of a pot wandering around looking to call a kettle whatever. (Some analogy: walking pots?) Thankfully, as usual, your opinions mean nothing to me.
As I said prior —Pots should not be going around looking to call another black.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walking_Home View Post
As I said prior —Pots should not be going around looking to call another black.
You were NOT involved in this exchange so I guess you fit your own description of a pot wandering around looking to call a kettle whatever. (Some analogy: walking pots?) Thankfully, as usual, your opinions mean nothing to me.
Forum Administrators seem to be out to close all threads that are off-topic.
You jumped in and accused DustinsDad of sarcasm in his response to mgrfin. Then you go further and tell him to go find a mirror. But I guess as far as Pots go --that is ok.
=mgrfin;3369165].
You are really impressed with my theology credentials. I am humbled by your admiration.
I can’t argue with you on that one. Degrees received via Internet are very impressive. Especially Theology Internet Degrees.peace
No one I know is impressed with a Theo degree from on-line.I can’t argue with you on that one. Degrees received via Internet are very impressive. Especially Theology Internet Degrees.
Forum Administrators seem to be out to close all threads that are off-topic.
This thread seems to be going that direction. You can always tell - people start attacking one another.
Maybe this thread should be closed too, since it is going nowhere.
Just 32 posts left to go before 1,000 - the magic number.
peace
Or perhaps he led it off-topic intentionally just to get it shut down. Pretty sad. I hope people don’t choose between sede-ism and RC-ism based on how their representatives act on these threads.
You know mgrfin — what is becoming quite clear – when you paint yourself into a corner from which you can’t get out—you start calling on the moderator to close the thread down.
Painted into a corner? I’m in no corner. If I were, people would be going for the jugular. Instead, like you, they are making weak, irrelevant, inconsequential, insignificant arguments.
You know mgrfin — what is becoming quite clear – when you paint yourself into a corner from which you can’t get out—you start calling on the moderator to close the thread down.
Isn’t that where you got yours?=mgrfin;3369839]No one I know is impressed with a Theo degree from on-line.
NoAre there any degrees available on-line from Rome?
Geez. Give me time. I can only type so fast!You refuse to answer?
ummm…let me think…no.Are you a priest or religious?
Painted into a corner? I’m in no corner. If I were, people would be going for the jugular. Instead, like you, they are making weak, irrelevant, inconsequential, insignificant arguments.
You know nothing about me! I have never backed down from a theological fight. But, this thread is not about the discussion posited. You, however, fight by personal attack, as is apparent from this post of yours, and others of yours in the past.
peace
Well pitch out a couple more rabbit holes…maybe a nice arguement debating 2+2=4, or whether Catholics are required to believe in the existance of God, etc. You know, those real tricky ones.…Just 32 posts left to go before 1,000 - the magic number…