L
Lost_Sheep
Guest
Because in their mind’s eye they did not see that they were doing anything wrong.Why did these women think they could receive Holy Communion anyway?
It makes no sense. Didn’t they ever go to confession?
Because in their mind’s eye they did not see that they were doing anything wrong.Why did these women think they could receive Holy Communion anyway?
It makes no sense. Didn’t they ever go to confession?
Too often people confuse “rights” with “wants.”A right to communion…
That’s one I have not heard before, but I am not surprised with the onslaught of new “rights” people seem to think they deserve.
And they also confuse our govt. with God. They don’t seem to understand that God is the highest authority not government.Too often people confuse “rights” with “wants.”
THIS ^I certainly hope this holy priest doesn’t receive the Father Marcel Guarnizo treatment.
First what? Didn’t you realize the ‘Constitution’ means whatever Caesar wants it to mean?I’m no lawyer, but I imagine they would have a hard time getting legal remediation. The courts are not going to stick their noses into how a church practices it doctrine. First amendment and all…
You are correct.Did they admit to the priest that they were having sexual relations? If they have been living platonicly they wouldn’t be sinning. Is what I am saying correct?
So now there is a civil right to the eucharist?True, but this couple is looking for a reason to file a lawsuit and make money of the Church, because the priest “discriminated” against them based on their sexual orientation.
It has been said “Some peoples’ minds are like cement-all mixed up and permanently set!”1 Corinthians 11:27, anyone…?
Their statements make it clear they are extremely poorly catechized or just hard headed in their heterodoxy.
They clearly presented themselves as a couple in the news media. That in itself would scandal to those with an orthodox understanding of the Church.Did they admit to the priest that they were having sexual relations? If they have been living platonicly they wouldn’t be sinning. Is what I am saying correct?
That’s really sad to hear.A little off topic, but a priest give me a ugly look during communion. I guess because I was the only non-white person at mass![]()
Obviously!I believe the priest has this right.
Ms. Parker said she hopes that the priest might “open his eyes and fully receive the LGBT community into the church.”
http://lawrencegarcia.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/JesusFacepalm21.png“We’re all God’s children, and we have every right to receive Communion,” she says.
Indeed. On one side we celebrate everyone coming or coming back into the Church. On the other, we don’t accept the way they were taught. Where do we find the right balance?Because in their mind’s eye they did not see that they were doing anything wrong.
Yup, true story. Only go to St. Mary Magdalene Catholic Church, Humble, TX if you are white.That’s really sad to hear.
But regarding the topic, I think the priest is right to deny them communion. It is even for the protection of the 2 people. Maybe they don’t know how they are disrespecting the Body of Christ of they DO take communion, therefore the priest is making the right choice.
I have a feeling it was more than just the “couple’s” private actions that caused the priest to withdraw communion from them. I’ve been at Masses where some couples certainly knew how to attract attention to themselves, to put it gently.People seem to think they have a right to receive Holy Communion. Nope! To give Communion to a couple living in a scandalous relationship is in itself reason of grave scandal. Of course, he should have addressed the issue privately, and directed them not to approach the altar for Communion unless they acknowledged their sin and repented, returning to walk in the way of the Lord. But if they still insisted in approaching the Altar, the priest, by denying them Communion, spared them from a most grave sacrilege against the Eucharist and perhaps even from damnation. For to receive the Body and Blood of Christ unworthily is to eat and drink condemnation.