Scapegoat of recent scandal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aroosi
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
He got away. I have no evidence.
The best thing to do is to get a group of men on your side. Start with your husband, and let him find some other men in the parish that you all can trust. Spread the word about what’s going on. Don’t go to any parish authority, they cannot be trusted.

Also, your husband should’ve had a talk this man.
 
Last edited:
I keep going back to this and it kills me inside.
I pray you will at some time be able to forgive this person and find healing. Things we hold on to can rot away at us and like you said, kill us inside.
 
The part that I think about is what more I should have done. Did me believing it truly would be handled by the parish staff open the door for him to hurt other children? We moved within 6 months of the incident so I did not go to the police as I first wanted to. It was at the time a relief to just wash my hands of the situation. I do know he is still listed as a youth group leader on the parish website and this incident was many years ago (around 5-6 years). It kills me that I didn’t pursue it further and may be complicit in other families being harmed. There were several of us that same year that had filed complaints. Forgiving him is the easy part. Forgetting will never happen. Forgiving myself is what is difficult.
 
That is too bad he is still a youth group leader.

I think sometimes things happen and at the time they are happening it is difficult to think clearly what to do.
 
I have difficulty believing this. You would think if it were true the MSM would be ALL over it but narry a peep from mainstream sources.

The article linked has no sources mentioned (that I saw).

I don’t know… I am just very skeptical.
 
NC Register had the same story. The reason it wasn’t picked up in a big way was probably because neither the Vatican nor the police would confirm any details whatsoever. So really we’ll never know what (if anything) actually occurred.
 
It is important to find the root causes for the abuse, the cover-up and the seemingly complacent attitude around this scandal. I am not anti gay, I feel people with SSA are given a very rough situation to deal with.

Looking at the data about 90% of the victims are boys mostly maybe 80% teens. Now the majority of priest are heterosexual, I can’t guess at the percentage, why then is the homosexual acts predominate?

I have a theory, to me homosexual sex is akin to masturbation. It lacks for want of a better word completeness. Masturbation does not satisfy the deep needs one has to be truly loved, physically, emotionally and spiritually. I know marital love meets all those needs. I know that masturbation does not meet those needs. I have only read about homosexual sex. One article was explaining why AIDS spread so fast, sited parties on fire island where a guy could have sex with 20 or more men is a single night.
Point being that they had desires that couldn’t get satisfied.

So some of our priest are homosexual and can’t live a celibate life and the easiest targets are teens. Despite the risk they repeat and repeat.

Does that make sense to anyone else?
 
Looking at the data about 90% of the victims are boys mostly maybe 80% teens. Now the majority of priest are heterosexual, I can’t guess at the percentage, why then is the homosexual acts predominate?
Maybe there weren’t any altar girls for heterosexual priests to abuse. And if a priest had been hanging around 14 year old girls a lot, he would probably have drawn more attention to himself than a priest hanging around boys.
 
Last edited:
40.png
Theo2:
Looking at the data about 90% of the victims are boys mostly maybe 80% teens. Now the majority of priest are heterosexual, I can’t guess at the percentage, why then is the homosexual acts predominate?
Maybe there weren’t any altar girls for heterosexual priests to abuse. And if a priest had been hanging around 14 year old girls a lot, he would probably have drawn more attention to himself than a priest hanging around boys.
This is really stretching.
These people are abusing who they are abusing. There are hard statistics.
Why do you want to dance around that and exculpate that?
 
40.png
Thorolfr:
40.png
Theo2:
Looking at the data about 90% of the victims are boys mostly maybe 80% teens. Now the majority of priest are heterosexual, I can’t guess at the percentage, why then is the homosexual acts predominate?
Maybe there weren’t any altar girls for heterosexual priests to abuse. And if a priest had been hanging around 14 year old girls a lot, he would probably have drawn more attention to himself than a priest hanging around boys.
This is really stretching.
These people are abusing who they are abusing. There are hard statistics.
Why do you want to dance around that and exculpate that?
I didn’t say that boys weren’t being abused, and apparently in much higher numbers than girls. I was only answering Theo’s question as to why a lot fewer girls were abused. Well, one obvious reason is that priests would have had far fewer opportunities to abuse girls.
 
40.png
goout:
40.png
Thorolfr:
40.png
Theo2:
Looking at the data about 90% of the victims are boys mostly maybe 80% teens. Now the majority of priest are heterosexual, I can’t guess at the percentage, why then is the homosexual acts predominate?
Maybe there weren’t any altar girls for heterosexual priests to abuse. And if a priest had been hanging around 14 year old girls a lot, he would probably have drawn more attention to himself than a priest hanging around boys.
This is really stretching.
These people are abusing who they are abusing. There are hard statistics.
Why do you want to dance around that and exculpate that?
I didn’t say that boys weren’t being abused, and apparently in much higher numbers than girls. I was only answering Theo’s question as to why a lot fewer girls were abused. Well, one obvious reason is that priests would have had far fewer opportunities to abuse girls.
geez.
really?
Are gay men attracted to girls? Priests have all kinds of opportunities around women or girls.
Can we just admit what is factual? This abuse is overwhelming homosexual in flavor.
 
Last edited:
geez.
really?
Are gay men attracted to girls?
No, but there are priests who are not gay men. Or at least I assume that that is the case. And some of the priests who are not gay were involved in abusing female children and adolescents. And if they had had easy access to girls, the number of girls abused would probably have been higher.
 
Priests have all kinds of opportunities around women or girls.
They really don’t. How many priests like “Uncle Ted” could have easily invited a few nuns to go to a beach house with them and maybe share a bed together. And most of the men I know personally who were abused as children were altar boys (there weren’t any altar girls back then). One person I know was abused by a priest who was the principal of his Catholic school starting when he was 14. The principal would take him off campus with him to his house during school hours and none of the staff at the school thought anything about it. But I think that if the principal had been taking a student home with him who was a 14 year old girl, it would have drawn more scrutiny.
 
Last edited:
40.png
goout:
geez.
really?
Are gay men attracted to girls?
No, but there are priests who are not gay men. Or at least I assume that that is the case. And some of the priests who are not gay were involved in abusing female children and adolescents. And if they had had easy access to girls, the number of girls abused would probably have been higher.
Boggles my mind.
How do you imagine that priests don’t have access to women?

Why can’t you simply deal with what is?
 
Rod Dreher published a commentary by a reader about this. This writer is a gay man in a same sex civil marriage.

“It’s just not the same thing as with straight men. Well-meaning straight liberals just do not get it, and lots of gay men will not criticize anything gay men collectively do because they think it will result in both lots of anger from other gay men as well as the empowerment of ideological enemies who want to, say, ban gay marriage.”

The article can be found here.
 
40.png
goout:
Priests have all kinds of opportunities around women or girls.
They really don’t. How many priests like “Uncle Ted” could have easily invited a few nuns to go to a beach house with them and maybe share a bed together. And most of the men I know personally who were abused as children were altar boys (there weren’t any altar girls back then). One person I know was abused by a priest who was the principal of his Catholic school starting when he was 14. The principal would take him off campus with him to his house during school hours and none of the staff at the school thought anything about it. But I think that if the principal had been taking a student home with him who was a 14 year old girl, it would have drawn more scrutiny.
Let me tell you, your line of thinking is what allows things like to go on and on. Because you don’t deal with the simple realities. And if don’t address reality, you cannot solve problems.
 
So if you couldn’t access men you would be married with a woman?
 
Last edited:
Rod Dreher published a commentary by a reader about this. This writer is a gay man in a same sex civil marriage.

“It’s just not the same thing as with straight men. Well-meaning straight liberals just do not get it, and lots of gay men will not criticize anything gay men collectively do because they think it will result in both lots of anger from other gay men as well as the empowerment of ideological enemies who want to, say, ban gay marriage.”

The article can be found here.
It’s someone’s anonymous comment left in a thread at The American Conservative. Maybe that was his experience of the gay community based on the kinds of people he hung around with. But gay men and the gay community are not some sort of uniform and monolithic entity. I know plenty of gay men who never use drugs, don’t engage in anonymous sex, etc. You can’t say things like, “Look at the sexual choices gay men (collectively speaking) make…”. They don’t make choices collectivity, they make them individually. People don’t usually go around saying things like, “Look at the sexual choices straight men (collectively speaking) make…” as if all straight men are the same sexually.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top