see my past post in other threads,
you are assuming it will stop the killers. the tech isn’t here yet.
Of course gun recognition technology would reduce the likelihood of a 16 year old boy from shooting his parent’s gun.
There are thousands of threads and tens of thousands of posts. Why not give your suggestions here and now?
And THAT can be a problem too right AINg?
www.inquisitr.com
www.nbcnews.com
www.wymt.com
https://www-1.thenewstribune.com/latest-news/article218020130.html
murder is against the law, we can guess the values of the perps with this intent. Do you think a tech lock will stop them?
would it? when a kid will kill his parents, do you think a tech lock will be a real deterrent? as I said they would have worked out this detail in the planning stage.
too long and redundant for each gun thread.
Yes it would help. How would a child shoot his parents if the gun did not work because of grip recognition failure?
I agree with almost all of these, except that I think it better to have highly trained armed guards and snipers instead of arming the teachers. I already said that if you are not going to agree to gun control, you are going to have to have secure walls or fences around the school and a metal detector with a frisk and search policy to scan for weapons.
this is the problem with anti-gun propaganda, how about, he uses another tool?upant:
Yes it would help. How would a child shoot his parents if the gun did not work because of grip recognition failure?
only if it worked, as it stands now, it isn’t perfected and cost-prohibitive to the poor. if you were giving the tech away, then this would be a starting point for discussion.
again, it is a matter of cost and denying the poor a constitutional right. people control is what gun control is really about.
lawnews.tv
Should we then make sure that the poor women can have abortions of little cost so that their right to an abortion (as determined by the US Supreme Court) is not abridged. Are constitutional rights as determined by the Supreme Court sacred? Is it true that the Constitution has set up the Supreme Court as the ultimate arbiter of what is and what is not allowed?
In using the term “murder” and “perp” you’ve already included a declaration of a value judgement in your question. The more neutral term would be killing. But as we’ve already seen the value judgement applied to killings is situational and varies. Ex: killing in self defense will probably be evaluated differently by many individuals than say killing for gain.
self-defense is a God-given right, I don’t think abortion is the same.
a silly question used to pull on the heartstrings of people who don’t understand the role of guns. Give the 15-year-olds a chance by using some of the items I suggested above. making them defenseless hasn’t worked. people want these kids to vote but not defend themself, which is it? are they mature or not?
No, the lawmakers created the issue when they denied schools any defense. they created “criminal only carry zones” taking away anything that could stop the perp. Blaming the gun is just using kids to get control of the people. When I was 15, kids took their own guns to school and most boys had a knife in their pocket. what is different?
It is all about upbringing. When you let the village bring up the kids, we should not be surprised they can’t cope with real-world scenarios. The “everybody-wins” society is not reality, evil exists and you don’t make it go away by not educating kids about it. Kids should have been taught gun safety at an early age instead of being sheltered and learning about guns from TV and video games.
we are talking about the premeditated intentional killing of people, it is murder.
if this is such a good idea, why aren’t the cops using them? think about it, no cop would have to worry about his gun being taken from them and used against them. Which police department is using this grand idea? it isn’t ready for prime time.
No. It is about the American gun culture. God given inalienable rights, such as the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, take precedence over secular rights granted by a few men writing a Constitution more than 200 years ago. The American gun culture is denying school children their God given inalienable rights while favoring the man made secular Constitutional rights.
The American liberal extremist culture has no problem denying school children the right to pray to God in school. A right granted to them in the same Constitution.
No it’s not.
I say it is because as already explained above, school children are being traumatized and frightened out of their minds as they are faced with the possibility of being shot dead while eating in the school cafeteria. Further, they are denied the pursuit of happiness because the gun culture is causing them to have nightmares. And they are traumatized by seeing their classmates being gunned down at school.
Wrong.
So says you.
There have been guns in this country since the beginning and they were easier to obtain, why all of a sudden are the children the victims?
Abortion is not a right. this supreme court ruling can be overturned with another supreme court ruling. Abortion was ruled under the due process clause but it does not carry the same weight as due process. To change due process would require a constitutional amendment. abortion just needs another case.
But the court was WRONG.
