Scientists Find Soft Tissue in T-Rex Bone

  • Thread starter Thread starter stumbler
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Orogeny:
That is not scriptural. What do you base this claim on?

It is interesting that the ark came to rest on a mountain, not a plain.

Peace

Tim
Click to expand...
scripture: Genesis 10:25. :To Eber two sons were born; the name of the first was Peleg, for in his time the world was divided; and the name of his brother was Joktan.

Noah might have been surprised too. There were great geographical forces now involved with the flood scenario. Mountain building was one of them.
 
40.png
Orogeny:
Have at it. Good luck finding any in your state (Hawaii).

Peace

Tim
Click to expand...
Ha! They have lots in Alaska, though, your BIGGER than Texas state.
 
40.png
Orogeny:
Yeah, but there were no plants to eat, remember? He had to eat the animals right away.

Peace

Tim
Click to expand...
You’re not going to give up are you!

Well Genesis 6:21. “Moreover, you are to provide yourself with all the food that is to be eaten, and store it away, that it may serve as provisions for you and for them.” So you see, he had lots of left over food, canned, bottled and dried and some were vacuum sealed, no doubt.:rolleyes:
 
Genesis 1:9
Then God said, “Let the water under the sky be gathered into a single basin, so that the dry land may appear.” and so it happened; the water under the sky was gathered into its basin, and the dry land appeared. God called the dry land “the earth,” aand the basin of the water he called “the sea.” God saw how good it was.
Click to expand...
So it looked like therre was a single sea, and a single land mass. Since there are now separated continents, this single land mass must have split. “Science” only recently concurs with this scenario.
 
40.png
Orogeny:
Veal, anyone?

They better be real quick to reproduce and mature to reproduce again, because 7 pairs won’t last long when there is nothing else to eat.

Peace

Tim
Click to expand...
Hey I got a good answer, why didn’t I think about this before. You have 7 pairs, right? Let’s say cattle. You only need one bull to service the herd for reproduction, so you can eat the other six. Now please don’t say “that’s a lot of bull” because it is a lot of bull! You only have eight people to feed, so that is bull in sufficient supply! Ok, so you run out of bull, then you go get six bull Elk and go through them, then you go through six bull Moose, six roosters, six Billy goats, six stag deer, you are talking about mucho meat! By the time they go through all that meat, they will want more vegetables! Bet you the corn would have ready to harvest by that time.
 
40.png
catholic2:
Hey I got a good answer, why didn’t I think about this before. You have 7 pairs, right? Let’s say cattle. You only need one bull to service the herd for reproduction, so you can eat the other six. Now please don’t say “that’s a lot of bull” because it is a lot of bull! You only have eight people to feed, so that is bull in sufficient supply! Ok, so you run out of bull, then you go get six bull Elk and go through them, then you go through six bull Moose, six roosters, six Billy goats, six stag deer, you are talking about mucho meat! By the time they go through all that meat, they will want more vegetables! Bet you the corn would have ready to harvest by that time.
Click to expand...
😃 😃

Peace

Tim
 
It is sad but I knew it.
The people who put thier trust in althiestic and thiestic evolution, lacking a sense of God’s power, divine revelation and respect for scripture, move on to disputing the global flood of Noah as a global retribution.
*Next will come the parting of the red sea as a accident
*The pagues on Egypt as purely accidental natural phenomenen
*Disputing the Virgin Birth of Our Lord
*Denial of the ressurection.
*A denial of all miracles both modern and ancient
It is old heresy that keeps reaing its ugly head when we doubt in divine revelation and put our trust in mans word rather than God’s. 😦
God Bless and Mary protect you all
 
CreosMary

I agree with you. That’s why I stand on the Word of God. God has done mighty things for us to see, which includes the great world-wide flood. He has revealed these things to us through His written word and He honors those who hears His words in child-like acceptance, but His word is hidden from those who are arrogant in their earthly wisdom and learning.

Romans 1:25 comes to mind:
“They exchanged the truth of God for a lie and revered and worshiped the creature rather than the creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.”

Many are taken in by “science” which by it’s own definition is a philosophy of doubting. Science is supposed to try to disprove whatever hypothesis is put forth, and this is exactly what it attempts. After going through the process an hypothesis may be upgraded to a theory, yet that theory itself may also challenged. This is the scientific method. Yet people get trapped in taking these theories as ultimate fact, many times against scripture. Then this scripture applies to them:

Romans 1:20-23
“Ever since the creation of the world, his invisible attributes of eternal power and divinity have been able to be understood and perceived in what he has made. As a result, they have no excuse; for although they knew God they did not accord him glory as God or give Him thanks. Instead, they became vain in their reasoning, and their senseless minds were darkened. While claiming to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for the likeness of an image of mortal man or of birds or of four-legged animals or of snakes.”

Notice for example how quickly some will accept a localized flood instead of a global one?

May the Lord bless and keep all of us and His will manifest in our lives.
 
40.png
catholic2:
Notice for example how quickly some will accept a localized flood instead of a global one?
Click to expand...
Based on facts, yes I do accept a localized flood.

When I inquired as to what your academic history is I am asking if you attended a university and what your major was or currently is.
 
40.png
Mac6yver:
Based on facts, yes I do accept a localized flood.
Mac6yverWhere did you go to school C2?
Click to expand...
This was your original question. Then I asked for your definition of “school”. I just have a BA and some graduate work, in Sociology.
Didn’t those scripture quotes I gave above affect you at all?:confused:
Click to expand...
 
40.png
catholic2:
Mac6yverWhere did you go to school C2?
This was your original question. Then I asked for your definition of “school”. I just have a BA and some graduate work, in Sociology.
Why don’t you accept a Global flood as described in Genesis 7 and 8? Didn’t those scripture quotes I gave above affect you at all?:confused:
Click to expand...
C2, you are dealing with someone who does not take the Bible for face value. I think you should know that. So no, your scripture quotes will have little effect on my position.
 
40.png
Mac6yver:
C2, you are dealing with someone who does not take the Bible for face value. I think you should know that. So no, your scripture quotes will have little effect on my position.
Click to expand...
I just now checked you Bio. An agnostic is not necessarily against God, but merely skeptical. You should study the issue to see if your skepticism is warranted. I am sure you have to some extent, but until you come to some conclusion, you remain an agnostic. If you have reached a conclusion, then perhaps you do not fit the definition.
 
There are two kinds of agnostics, the first being those who question whether God exist or not. The second being those who question who or what God is, and what God wants, if anything. I fit into the second group. I personally do not believe any religion on Earth that exists today or ever has existed knows what God wants from us.
 
40.png
Mac6yver:
There are two kinds of agnostics, the first being those who question whether God exist or not. The second being those who question who or what God is, and what God wants, if anything. I fit into the second group. I personally do not believe any religion on Earth that exists today or ever has existed knows what God wants from us.
Click to expand...
And then there’s the dyslexic agnostic, who lies awake at night wondering if there really is a Dog.http://forums.catholic-questions.org/images/icons/icon12.gif
 
40.png
Mac6yver:
There are two kinds of agnostics, the first being those who question whether God exist or not. The second being those who question who or what God is, and what God wants, if anything. I fit into the second group. I personally do not believe any religion on Earth that exists today or ever has existed knows what God wants from us.
Click to expand...
I think there does not exist a God that does not want us to know what he wants…why am I saying it in the negative…

If there is a God he wants us to know Him and what He wants from us. In Yahweh and His Son Jesus, He makes it abundantly clear, especially in Scripture. Take a look at the old testament prophecies and how they were fulfilled. The law of probability for such fulfillment is beyond chance to the nth degree! In other words, it is God written. See how the Old Testament dovetails into the New. The prohecy of Daniel’s 70 weeks over 2,600 years ago, for example predict to the very day, hour and minute and yes, second of Christ’s entry into Jerusalem (I figured this one out myself … Be glad to show the math to you if you want…a C2 original!) And while there were many prophecies that pointed to the 1st coming, there are more that point to the 2nd. In this manner God puts his fingerprint on scripture.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top