Scientists Find Soft Tissue in T-Rex Bone

  • Thread starter Thread starter stumbler
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
catholic2:
I think there does not exist a God that does not want us to know what he wants…why am I saying it in the negative…

If there is a God he wants us to know Him and what He wants from us. In Yahweh and His Son Jesus, He makes it abundantly clear, especially in Scripture. Take a look at the old testament prophecies and how they were fulfilled. The law of probability for such fulfillment is beyond chance to the nth degree! In other words, it is God written. See how the Old Testament dovetails into the New. The prohecy of Daniel’s 70 weeks over 2,600 years ago, for example predict to the very day, hour and minute and yes, second of Christ’s entry into Jerusalem (I figured this one out myself … Be glad to show the math to you if you want…a C2 original!) And while there were many prophecies that pointed to the 1st coming, there are more that point to the 2nd. In this manner God puts his fingerprint on scripture.
Before you go any farther into Protestant exegesis, I suggest you visit and study this site:
salvationhistory.com/library/scripture/churchandbible/magisterial/principlesinterp.cfm
 
40.png
catholic2:
No Assumptions on this one, only that what scripture says is true.
NO assumptions?
40.png
catholic2:
The prohecy of Daniel’s 70 weeks over 2,600 years ago, for example predict to the very day, hour and minute and yes, second of Christ’s entry into Jerusalem (I figured this one out myself … .
Which chapter and verse in which Gospel tells you “hour and minute and yes, second of Christ’s entry into Jerusalem?”
40.png
catholic2:
This is exactly what prophecy means!
That is why I asked you to read about Catholic exegesis.
 
The calculation to the exact time of Jesus’ triumphal entry into Jerusalem (when he sits astride the donkey) starts at Daniel 9:25-26. the math is my own.)

I’m going out of this building. laters.
 
40.png
catholic2:
The calculation to the exact time of Jesus’ triumphal entry into Jerusalem (when he sits astride the donkey) starts at Daniel 9:25-26. the math is my own.)

I’m going out of this building. laters.
And what source do you have that tells you the exact time to the second of Christ’s entrance into Jerusalem – other than these calculations?

The following is the footnote from the New American Bible for Catholics:

[2] Seventy years: the prophet Jeremiah (Jeremiah 25:11; 29:10) prophesied a Babylonian captivity of seventy years, a round number signifying the complete passing away of the existing generation. Jeremiah’s prophecy was fulfilled in the capture of Babylon by Cyrus and the subsequent return of the Jews to Palestine. However, the author of Daniel, living during the persecution of Antiochus, sees the conditions of the exile still existing; therefore, in his meditation he extends Jeremiah’s number to seventy weeks of years (Daniel 9:24), i.e., seven times seventy years, to characterize the Jewish victory over the Seleucids as the ultimate fulfillment of the prophecy.

Note how this conforms to Catholic exegesis – the prophecy is relevant to the conditions of the time.
 
Luke 19:41(DR)

41*And when he drew near, seeing the city, he wept over it, saying:**http://www.scriptours.com/images/spacer.gif
*42If thou also hadst known, and that in this thy day, the things that are to thy peace: but now they are hidden from thy eyes.

What was hidden from the children of Israel was that had they known that Daniel’s prediction applied to Jesus, they would have made the connection that He was the long-awaited Messiah. My calculation shows how this would have been possible. The calculation always existed but it was hidden from their eyes. I can show this calculation, but it will take bringing out a lot of pertinent things, which will take time and this forum is not the proper place for it.

If anyone is genuinely interested, and realize the implications if my calculation is correct, then perhaps a new thread in apologetics or scripture can be opened and I will participate in it.

Perhaps the greatest implication is for present day Judeans because of the connection between the old testament and the new, and that Messiah’s second coming is not for them the first.

This discussion on Dinosaurs has been very interesting and educational. The Young Earth reigns( along with T.Rex! ) (imho)😃
 
Hi:
did you know how a T rex steak will taste like??
like JURASSIC PORK
 
40.png
catholic2:
Luke 19:41(DR)

41*And when he drew near, seeing the city, he wept over it, saying:*http://www.scriptours.com/images/spacer.gif
42If thou also hadst known, and that in this thy day, the things that are to thy peace: but now they are hidden from thy eyes.


What was hidden from the children of Israel was that had they known that Daniel’s prediction applied to Jesus, they would have made the connection that He was the long-awaited Messiah. My calculation shows how this would have been possible. The calculation always existed but it was hidden from their eyes. I can show this calculation, but it will take bringing out a lot of pertinent things, which will take time and this forum is not the proper place for it.

If anyone is genuinely interested, and realize the implications if my calculation is correct, then perhaps a new thread in apologetics or scripture can be opened and I will participate in it.

Perhaps the greatest implication is for present day Judeans because of the connection between the old testament and the new, and that Messiah’s second coming is not for them the first.

This discussion on Dinosaurs has been very interesting and educational. The Young Earth reigns( along with T.Rex! ) (imho)
And what source do you have that tells you the exact time to the second of Christ’s entrance into Jerusalem – other than these calculations?
 
vern humphrey:
And what source do you have that tells you the exact time to the second of Christ’s entrance into Jerusalem – other than these calculations?
scripture (and I wish you’d read my post in this regard!)
 
vern humphrey:
And where in scripture do you find the exact time to the second of Christ’s entrance into Jerusalem?

Don’t beat around the bush, just give me chapter and verse. http://forums.catholic-questions.org/images/icons/icon12.gif
I suppose you can’t really fathom what I have in mind so I won’t fault you. I’ve already given you two scriptures that have to do with the math, both in Luke and in Daniel. In both passages you have to determine the numerical values as well as date(s). Several other passages are also intricately involved with dates and numerical values. You will have a hard time making sense of the whole thing without a thorough explanation of the process, and the process involves going step by step. But intricate as it is, once in place it is easy to see how it all adds up. Again, this forum is not the place for this.

Is anyone interested in going through this? Please post or start a new thread.
 
40.png
catholic2:
I suppose you can’t really fathom what I have in mind so I won’t fault you. I’ve already given you two scriptures that have to do with the math, both in Luke and in Daniel. In both passages you have to determine the numerical values as well as date(s). Several other passages are also intricately involved with dates and numerical values. You will have a hard time making sense of the whole thing without a thorough explanation of the process, and the process involves going step by step. .
So you say. But you don’t give any Gospel passage that gives the minute and second that Jesus entered Jerusalem – so all your “math” is for naught.

Now I suppose you’ve heard of Pythagoras?http://forums.catholic-questions.org/images/icons/icon12.gif
 
40.png
catholic2:
My assumption is based on logic. If there were more air breathing flora/fauna in the past than now, there should have been less c14 in the atmosphere. And there were more f/f in the past than today that’s easy to prove.
Yet if you’re talking pre-flood, there would have been a lot more water vapor in the atmosphere, possibly blocking cosmic rays from generating C-14 at the same rate that occurs today. Note that it’s quite easy to hypothesize.
 
40.png
chemcatholic:
Yet if you’re talking pre-flood, there would have been a lot more water vapor in the atmosphere, possibly blocking cosmic rays from generating C-14 at the same rate that occurs today. Note that it’s quite easy to hypothesize.
I suppose that water canopy, still being intact in pre-flood could have that effect on C14. So the lush vegetation and teeming fauna coupled with more atmospheric water vapor could significantly reduce the C14 factor at that time relative to present levels. Sounds good to me, thanks. But is it possible to prove a reduced level of C14?
(I’m puzzled - did you really want to give me an argument for a young earth?)
 
40.png
catholic2:
I suppose that water canopy, still being intact in pre-flood could have that effect on C14. So the lush vegetation and teeming fauna coupled with more atmospheric water vapor could significantly reduce the C14 factor at that time relative to present levels. Sounds good to me, thanks. But is it possible to prove a reduced level of C14?
(I’m puzzled - did you really want to give me an argument for a young earth?)
ldolphin.org/sewell/c14dating.html
Site says that C14 shows a young earth and touches on the discussion above.
 
So, for those who don’t see science and faith as contradictory, here’s a question on human evolution. I’ve been thinking of the Old Testament story, the way God chose a tribe and made them separate (think of all the laws in Leviticus, for instance, that seem designed to keep the Israelites as a distinct people), to form them into the nation Israel. Could God have worked in a similar fashion in creating humans? At some point in our biological past, there had to be a break separating humans from all the other animals, including our biological ancestors and cousins. Could it have worked similar to the separation and formation of Israel? God picks out Adam and Eve, the first humans, whose humanity is passed on through their descendents (almost like a gene)?

As to when this would have happened, around 40,000 years ago there was something called the “Great Leap Forward” - all of a sudden we find things like musical instruments, cave paintings, etc. Seriously, all of a sudden, just like that. Interesting, no?
 
Philip P:
So, for those who don’t see science and faith as contradictory, here’s a question on human evolution. I’ve been thinking of the Old Testament story, the way God chose a tribe and made them separate (think of all the laws in Leviticus, for instance, that seem designed to keep the Israelites as a distinct people), to form them into the nation Israel. Could God have worked in a similar fashion in creating humans? At some point in our biological past, there had to be a break separating humans from all the other animals, including our biological ancestors and cousins. Could it have worked similar to the separation and formation of Israel? God picks out Adam and Eve, the first humans, whose humanity is passed on through their descendents (almost like a gene)?

As to when this would have happened, around 40,000 years ago there was something called the “Great Leap Forward” - all of a sudden we find things like musical instruments, cave paintings, etc. Seriously, all of a sudden, just like that. Interesting, no?
Why not? After all, it is the soul that makes us human, not the body.

Now, could a being with a human-like mind exist without a soul? Certainly – Chimpanzees, for example, do not have immortal souls, but the more we learn about them, the more they seem to have minds like (but inferior to) ours.

Similarly, could a being exist that had an immortal soul, but not a mind like ours? Of course – there are plenty of people born with severe mental retardation, and no one denies they are as human as we are, with immortal souls.

So God could have ensouled an Adam who was a hominid (not a modern human), or He could have withheld the immortal soul from some very advanced creatures until modern Humans were fully developed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top